pfife

"just the facts" such as a prediction of what will happen between now and 2024

So if all individuals in a country are burdened with a chant that occurred within said country by a small proportion of it's population, does that mean Archie is also burdened with every chant that's been said in this country by a small proportion of it's population? Just wondering if this is yet another Trumper double standard. Ok I lied, I'm not wondering at all.

Yep. Republicans tried to overthrow the government and Archie defends and celebrates them. Shows a particularly selective love of America seemingly based on the characteristics of the people hating America. If only we could determine what characteristic....... hmmmmmmmmmm

Republicans tried to destroy America on Jan 6 and you celebrate them.

gee I wonder why anyone would call republicans racist. Really hard to figure it out.

Ron DeSantis is a republican and doesn't condemn literal nazis. Nice try hoss.

All you need to do is listen to cspan for an hour in the mornings to know where Republicans are on immigration. They'll call in and tell you.

Like this dem who can't condemn nazis

I didn't test positive until my second rapid test. I did have symptoms when I took the first test that showed up negative, next one day later showed positive.

lol rediculous

LOL @ the dude who calls immigrants "invaders" and also argues that it wasn't an insurrection. Get a clue bro.

these days most qualified means creative writing skills to make it look like the founding fathers agreed with you. And also making it look like what the founding fathers thought is important.

but reagan identity politic'd that too, so what are we even talking about here?

It's because logic doesn't matter, it's about attacking the libs, that's it. That's all it's ever about.

I think you just literally argued that they lost on BBB b/c they tried BBB instead of celebrating not BBB instead of trying BBB. SMH

I think you could make the argument that an experience as a black woman qualifies them even more for what the court needs.

I don't think anything was required. He definitely could have chosen a different path to the nomination. Reagan quote literally says the opposite of what you said about Reagan appointing Sandra Day Oconnor - he literally said he was selecting the most qualified woman. DId you look for what Reagan said at the time before you posted this? A few months later, at a news conference in Los Angeles, he made it official, saying: “I am announcing today that one of the first Supreme Court vacancies in my administration will be filled by the most qualified woman I can possibly find. … It is time for a woman to sit among the highest jurists.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/01/26/biden-reagan-supreme-court/

I'd take immigrants over MAGAs everyday of the week

the promise, as I understand it, was a huge reason he won SC in the primaries and that's when he started his roll. He was floundering before that. To call that a negative when it may have saved the whole damn thing seems not correct.

Yep

jet fuel can't destroy bridges

LOL @ CSPAN playing quotes from Trump regarding saving Amy Corney Barnett for the RBG seat and also Trumpers not liking the selection made based on demographics

ultra liberal CNN lmao