pfife

And just for the record, that was after you tried to equate a bunch of unapproved but contracted doses as "enough to vaccinate people" which would be that lie stuff I mentioned, which was also mentioned in your article that you posted, which also would be that "read past 2 paragraphs" thing I mentioned. Then when you then expect me to give you my time, and expect me to treat your posts as if this crap doesn't happen, no sale chief. Your posts get as much of my time and attention as I want to give you.

speaking of not reading posts, perhaps you should adhere to the standard you impose on others. I guess we can add "double standard" to the list of features. Standards for others but not yourself. Typical of trumpers as often pointed out in this forum.

LOL. Imagine thinking the media has a liberal bias. Takes a health level of divorce from reality to think that.

Then you shouldn't repeatedly post articles that don't support what you're saying that end up wasting my time. Like you did yesterday when you posted one that said clearly said enough for 200m ppl and then argued it said 300m ppl.

False, I regularly admit that I don't even bother reading posts that are a waste of my time - that contain such features as lies about Whitmer, crappy hypotheticals instead of actual reality, articles offered as support that actually belie the point if you read past 2 paragraphs, and basic mathematical miscalculations. These are all things you do quite often and repeatedly. You seem to be under some weird self-absorbed, conceited impression that I owe your posts more time that I feel like spending on them. I owe you absolutely nothing chief.

And also nice literally saying multiple times that a policy change didn't cause it, then literally blaming a Biden policy change for it. troll much?

Lol except it didn't. Nice making it up as you go

You argue white people can't get the vaccine so your grasp of simple facts is not trustworthy.

But not the lies. Imagine saying white ppl can't get vaccinated. Then imagine choosing to log into this website, drop really dated insults that are so bad they're self burns, and also defending a lie that white people can't get vaxxed.

Lol at your boomer nickname for me. Couldn't come up with a reference under 60 years old chief? Oh and why not address what I say instead of what I don't say as I've never said that It's hilarious how scared of my posts you are

White people can get vaxed. He obviously lied and you choose to defend it.

All tax breaks are not subject to filibuster because they're budget items and this are applicable for reconciliation. Pretty convenient for the GOP huh? Screw the filibuster

In all of that did you admit you were wrong? I'm really lacking motivation to read all of that when I outright know you messed up the most rudimentary math

Chief: Your article said this Pfizer-BioNTech: 100 million doses (two-dose regimen) Moderna: 100 million doses (two-dose regimen) Johnson & Johnson: 100 million doses (one-dose regimen) Then you said this: Wrong. Literally what you posted would be 200 million people. Biden has vaccinated over 200 million people. unreal chief. You should at least have the basic math right before you flex.

check your math

literally didn't buy enough actual approved doses to vaccinate more than biden has, and actually turned down enoguh to do so - and you're arguing the exact oppposite would have happened if he was president in you fake world. SMH. Its simple numbers chief, even your numbers. Use them right.

if the gop wants the filibuster so bad they can just reinstall it when they're in the majority. It only takes 51 votes.

you're confusing "democracy" with "what I want"

Per usual... you didn't read your article far enough. It says this: An important point to remember, though, is that these contract numbers don’t necessarily represent deliverable vaccines. The contracts represent early promises. There were still important hurdles to be cleared before these possible vaccine candidates could be a reality

Lol at counting ones not approved. Just more not reality

I don't pay attention to your hypotheticals. You say something like "people would be more vaccinated if trump was president" and I start throwing real life facts at it in order to demonstrate out honest ridiculous it is. The details of your hypothetical are irrelevant to me. I don't even read them. You didn't post how many doses he had before he turned down the 100m. The article I posted said they had secured 100m Moderna before that. So he had enough for 50m to get vaccinated. Unless you want to find something more, like an actual number, that's pretty much the top limit you got if you wanna use actual facts and what happened to inform your fake world takes about how many trump woulda vaccinated. After that it becomes just you fictionalizing which is super boring

again no one silenced them. they are still more than able to bump their gums in front of cameras.

I miss conservatives here that weren't complete hacks. It's been a long time since we had even one. Oblong can you go back to being conservative? paging shabba like if we had at least one that thought "wow my argument is really bad" before hitting send that would be super awesome.

My understanding from a few months back was the exact opposite: AT&T basically birthed and raised OAN: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-oneamerica-att/

Also it's quite obvious the democrats DON'T support ending the fillibuster. They clearly and obviously don't have the votes to do it, which obviously means they don't support ending it. So not only are you a troll hack, you're a straight up liar too. That's not even addressing your implicit notion that a legislative device that allows a minority to stop anything is "democracy" which is obviously false on its face. Furthermore, ending it via the legislature voting on it would actually be democracy hoss. It would be democracy you don't like which you like to cancel. Because you're a hypocrite and like to cancel things you don't like, and cry about things getting cancelled you do like.