gehringer_2

and the funny part is that Trump would be on board for gun bans and confiscation in a NY minute as part of any plan his lizard brain could cook up to stay in power.

you know what - If the 2A fans want to push that analogy, my answer is I'd be happy as a clam if we had just as many rules and safety regs on guns, ammo, and gun owners as we have on cars, motor fuel, drivers, and drivers' licenses.

They lose to much? (!)

Sure that is the argument, and it is specious. Transportation is necessary to economic, and thus physical survival. Handguns are not. There is no analogy But nice try to move the goalposts.

The human species initially developed skills at co-operation that have allowed it to become the dominant life-form on the planet. But this ability to cooperate began around only the smallest groupings. Cooperation was based on trust, which initially was primarily a matter shared genetics - literally, if you smelled like I did, I worked with you. The history of civilization has pretty much been one long struggle for mankind to learn to enlarge the circles of cooperation needed to accomplish ever greater quality of life for itself, vs the constant tendency to withdraw back into the clan or tribe or sect. The objective value of truth ultimately doesn't matter when it comes to tribal members from outside the tribe, and tribal members will never seek truth objectively as long as they are bound to the tribe. The only, but hard answer, is that when we create a society whose members begin to identify with the larger society around them. When they begin to accept the value of every other person, to see their destiny as tied to every other soul on the planet, then will they start to seek truth objectively instead of through their tribal filter.

I guess the brain trust has crunched the numbers and decided they prefer the match-ups if they lose this game. Hard to explain Hinch today otherwise.

what are the odds either Duren or Thompson have improved their shooting any this year? I'll guess 50/50 for Ausar at least.

a little luck there - IIRC two sack were cancelled by penalities.

Tork was having a great month up to about the 20th - 890 OPS, then he went cold. Probably among the guys that started pressing.

It's the 1st time it happens - you just have to assume you are dying.

he practically took out the whole secondary.

Local guy - went to Mackenzie HS. He and my uncle ran in the same crowd of ne'er-do-wells back in the day.

yeah - last years Vierling was big add. Unfortunately when he did get in the line-up this season he didn't do much - maybe he was never right.

Agree Rob, I don't begrudge the guy anything. He's had a tougher go than I imagine most of us ever had to face and if that drives him to get as far as he can in the business, good for him. We could as easily ding a guy who is local, Mike Tirico, for not deigning to take the job that would have been his for the asking if he had asked.

and Keith is almost no loss, his production had already tailed off badly in the 2nd half before the injury. Colt made some progress this season, his overall offensive numbers slightly better than last year - but I expected more progress than we've seen. Showing he could still play 3rd is a big positive for the future, and he's only 23 -- so we can still hope for more improvement - but as of right now he's not a big loss.

I don't think he's ever going to get close to that, but if could at least get under 25% he'd probably raise his value.

something...something..switch hitter.... something.....

the thing with Riley is that he doesn't have to hit the way he does now - he certainly didn't last season. And this is kind of where I wonder where the Tiger coaches are. Earlier in the season everyone was talking about how Riley had shifted to the most extremely inclined swing in the majors. Now there is reason outliers are outliers, it's because you almost never find optimum performance at the extremes unless there is something extremely unusual about the player that makes him a physical outlier. Riley runs a little funny but there is really nothing that would lead you believe that he would be likely to be successful in a batting style that NO-ONE else succeeds with. I mean probabilities aren't rocket science. You better be able to prove your choice of an outlier style gets demonstrable results or your coaches should be on your case to get back to what normally works.

The relevant organizational question is whether this year's approach change has been without or without the blessing of his coaches. The Tiger org certainly understands that HR alone a productive player do not make. I guess maybe early on it looked like he could swing for the fences and be better overall, but the reality caught up with him - most likely in the form of pitchers adjusting to a guy they know is going for broke. Riley has to learn what Tork had to learn - you have to be the best hitter you are, even if that's not the hitter you'd like to be.

Riley has sold out to hit HRs and has succeeded in hitting more of them, but at the cost of a reduction in every measure of his overall offensive value. Dumb.

I think you can view it two ways 1- injuries are not a GM's fault - the starting pitching looked solid going into the season. There was no sense throwing away the future at the deadline - there was no possibility of adding enough to repair it all. 2- Thinking the pitchers that made up last years BP could repeat what they did was wishful thinking. He went into the season with a BP for which implosion was a high probability. Then he bungled the deadline by adding a lot of quantity but insufficient quality.

And they carry Salmonella.

Should be a great season for GR. 🥱

Time of possession was always an issue - maybe a better or just deeper defensive team that could have subbed more and they get over the top. But the Lions FO had no idea how to build a winning football team. They were all about flash - and especially flash at RB. Barry was the end of a long line of over reliance/over investment at RB. But beyond that they had little clue to team building.