gehringer_2

That was just stupid I'll be, it looks like he made it.

boys not in rhythm tonight. McKinstry wasn't rushed, if anything he crossed himself up by not just making the harder throw.

Tork hasn't even squared up a foul ball tonight.

So far we have good Tyler tonight.

Tiger hitters look dead on their feet. Three weak ground balls in the 6th.

aaaaand, tied it is.

well with Brebbia out there and Holton warming up I'd say it's likely as good as tied.

great AB by Dingler, then Colt wiffs on a middle middle FB and K's on the change. 😡

Of course the other side is working for the win, since when is that an excuse for you to essentially work with them when you are supposed to be on the other side?

sure looks like it.

Hinch taking a nap? Not sure why SGL is still out there.

that's about enough of this Sawyer....

yes. IIRC

Maybe his business starting getting too good.

I love the way SLG walks back up the mound after he misses with a pitch looking like he nothing but contempt for that baseball.

I don't either. Piston games maybe....

and SGL played it almost perfectly. He could have held the ball just a little longer and Tork doesn't have to make a throw, but pretty close to played exactly right.

Just your ordinary slo-pitch bat around in the 1st kind of game.....

the guy I couldn't place was Yonder Alonso, I had to piece together who he was from where he said he played and that he said he went to the AS game in Miami - which pinned it to 2017. They ID's everyone in the room but him. Very talkative guy.

I don't know how much more of Eric Hosmer and Manny Machado talking about cleats I can take......

sounds good to me.

OK so this not a political statement per se at all, just one about human perception in general - there are two immutable laws at work - the law of large numbers, and the law of decreasing returns. The first means you can make a lot of noise about 'waste' using numbers that seem big, but are still tiny potatoes in the total scheme, and the 2nd means that there is always a point where the cost of more thorough budget controls exceeds the dollars that control will save, ergo the 0% $ loss organization is a mirage - it's not even the target you can/should realistically aim for.

well, now it it's raining on my driveway.

Maybe Inge 2009

More DOGE budget savings evaporating. DOGE's work puts me in mind of dry ice, looks solid, but come back a little later and ...nothing.