gehringer_2

you look at how much vote totals have increased recently though and it is a different electorate. I buy the argument that making voting easier has increased the electorate - and I don't think that has played well for the dems. I don't think the Dems, who have for many decades been the party of the more engaged voter, have figured out how to reach the lower information, lower interest voter that has joined the electorate. This is why I think the Dems best hope is that Trump voter buyer's remorse simply shrinks the electorate in the next cycle as those people stay home realizing they were incompetent voters. If Dunning-Kruger holds the Dems will have a tougher go.

Obama did get a lot of votes in 08 - but on the other hand remember that Bush and the GOP had not only just blown the economy to smithereens with lax oversight (one case where you could say a president's admin was directly responsible for an economic outcome), but were also conducting wars that had become unpopular, plus his opposing candidate couldn't even decide if he was or wasn't in the race - so Obama had some very strong winds at his back. It *should* have been impossible for the GOP to win in 2008. And 2012 he got fewer votes - it was very competitive despite Obama's advantage of incumbency.

Maybe just the 'Costner effect'. A lot of his projects seem to be polarizing.

Michigan is a school that will be happy as a clam once the NCAA revenue settlement is in place. They really haven't had much reason to get themselves in trouble - not that that usually stops anyone who does.

exactly!

The thing I remember about it was that that that I had no sense of surprise that Americans boys in uni's would end up shooting other American kids with signs. We understood our society considered our lives to be disposable in that period no matter which 'side' we were on.

I haven't seen the DiNiro film but Paul Newman and Albert Salmi did a fine B&W production of BTDS way back in 1956 that I saw rebroadcast once - maybe late 60' or so. I've never seen it rebroadcast since. Don't know in particular about this one but a lot of stage dramas done as live TV specials back in the day were kinescoped (prior to video tape) and many have been lost.

If Keith has fixed himself, that's probably means the axe for Malloy, because to keep a productive Torkelson, Keith and Torres in the lineup together most nights means one of them will have DH tied down most nights. Malloy can play OF, but with Vierling back there will be even less reason to want him to.

Badly tired of fighting with the faculty is likely spot on

Field of Dreams is the odd duck though. It isn't really a sports movie. It's 'about' baseball's place in culture, but it's not directly about a baseball player or players or a team or playing baseball. The movie's protagonist is not a baseball player. Baseball is the framework for the movie's ruminations about a lot of other things to hang on. 'The Natural' was a beautiful film, well made in many ways but in the end I didn't thinnk the movie sold its plot premises as believable. Maybe they worked better in the book - which I didn't read. Or maybe Redford was just miscast. He certainly had the physical part - over which such a big deal was made at the time, but he's not the actor to make you believe in a character with the flaws of Roy Hobbes.

You don't think DeSantis is a lunatic? And he'll probably be angling to replace Trump in the near future and thus on the warpath against all his usual suspects again to get himself in the news. And in Fla the Gov has the direct control to meddle that you are insulated from at Mich. The last UM pres to leave by choice before retirement was Bolinger, who never really wanted to be there anyway. It's not been a job people left by choice in the past and he had just signed a pretty rich deal. OTOH, times change and FLA probably did have to throw a really big pot of money at someone to get them to come given the situation with DeSantis.

IIRC I saw Ausar use that same behind the back dribble in a game this season but I don't remember if it resulted in a finish like that or not.

That's almost too cute to be believable of the Chinese, but it would be perfect if true.

Reese's pitches must be the hardest on the staff to pick up because he seems to get way more swings on balls that finish way out of the zone than even most good pitchers.

The proposed protest policy his office had put out last year was pretty draconian piece of work. In my view it was poorly considered and had no place in any decent institution and the push back across the University was hard. Maybe that was a point where the mismatch between the man and the institution became too obviously big to bridge. And that didn't even have anything to do with DEI.

Still, under normal circumstances you'd think a move to Florida would be a desperation move - who with a resume as solid as Ono would want go be under DeSantis' thumb in a situation as politicized a FLA? Or maybe Ono is just way more conservative at heart than he has ever let on in his previous gigs(?). I suppose he was comfortable at Cinci - which is not a school you'd consider part of the liberal elitist clique. The piece we would never hear about that could be also be in play is if he had struck out with some big donors recently. If you don't keep the $$ raining in that job that's a subtext issue that's below the public radar but could be a killer. But as you note - if that were the case the contract extension would probably not have been forthcoming.

Weirdly enough (and what wasn't about Rodman...) 91-92 season in Det he made 32 of 101 three's - but never was close to that before or after.

there are probably a couple of thousand Voodoo dolls of Ono with lots of pins stuck in them all over faculty offices in A^2. It's probably no fun working at a school once most of the faculty decides they don't like you. I haven't see any kind of rumbling that the Regents have had any issue with him - I suppose won't hear about that for while - if there were anything if might only filter out slowly.

We used to call that a Mickey Mouse outfield.

appears that way. (Yay!)

got a point there.

True, but there is still a big difference between hitting between 201/266/330 (Tork when they pulled the plug last season) and 107/286/107 (Jung now). I agree they want to give him more run, but I don't think they will/can for very long unless he can get a little further from a 2 digit BA. Hard to see what you even gain from the ABs if you are getting the bat on the ball that seldom. As it stands, I think he goes when Vierling is back, but Malloy is doing a good job of cratering also, so he could certainly still win the race down I-75.

In a perfect world it would be nice to give jace Jung 100 AB audition space, but that's going to be hard to do if he can't show at least a little more.

Tork and Sweeney with a 3-6-3

Dingler with another barrel.