chasfh

Trump misspelled “except for”.

Yeah, but see, it's all the same kind of crime Trump indulges in, so, Kushner's a good fella.

ha ha ha ha no

Interesting, I went to a Friday night football game in Georgia about a month ago, and they did pledge of allegiance in addition to national anthem. That was new to me, although not at all surprising.

I assume that would be a point of negotiation during trade talks.

I have no theory, but it doesn't mean it's not a possibility, or even probability. One hypothesis is that pitchers have to change the way they throw to dot the strike zone from 62 feet in a way that's different from 60 feet six inches.

Oh no will it affect his hall of fame eligibility

It’s definitely nice to be a perennial contender, even a perennial winner, and we definitely want to get there. Michigan fans have had a taste of that around here. So have Red Wings and Pistons fans at certain points in history. But I am really enjoying where we are now with the Tigers—at the beginning of it all, where everything is new and the future seems to have limitless potential, and I can barely wait for next year to see where we go next. I feel that way about the Lions, too.

“God Bless America” every game is gonna make a comeback. So are every-game tributes to the military and, yes, cops. Police states love police.

How ****ty is it that he even had to say that?

I would rather increase the weight of the ball by a quarter ounce or so than move the mound back. Both would affect pitchers and spike injuries, but at least one of them doesn’t change the actual appearance of the game.

If Putin does take the deal, that might mean Trump has already promised Putin we’re pulling out of NATO and starting a new military alliance with Russia.

Cue the “better to have them inside the tent” analogy from red hats.

MAGAs don’t think bombing Mexico is radical. They think it’s rad. I do think they’d get more than 200 votes to authorize, but i don’t think they’d get 218+ votes. That’s why Trump will give an order direct to the military and dare Congress to do anything about it.

Rolling Stone has been well known for decades to engage in terrific journalism. They sure beat the hell out of "End Wokeness", whatever the **** that is.

Looks to me like it was doctored to make her sound drunk. Easy to do by slowing it down by x%.

Dear lord, please let this be true ... Not because I am a huge MSNBC slappy—I almost never watch it—but I can't stomach the thought of this guy buying every major non-MAGA media vehicle in the country and turning them into Joe Rogan shock jock outlets, or whatever. I acknowledge that fascism-curious red hats would love for that to happen, but for the rest of us, please be reminded that's how the Nazi Germanies and the Soviet Unions of the world started out: they shut down media dissent first thing. After that, they rounded up the all the political opponents for political reasons and nobody heard a thing about that.

How come when I read things like this, I can't help but think of Kristellnacht? 1 big thing: Bomb threats target Trump officials Rep. Elise Stefanik. Photo: Alex Brandon/AP Several senior officials in the incoming Trump administration were targeted by false bomb threats this week, the transition announced. "Last night and this morning, several of President Trump's Cabinet nominees and Administration appointees were targeted in violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them," transition spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, the incoming White House press secretary, said in a statement. The attacks included both threats and attempted "swatting," in which someone calls in a fake emergency at someone else's home, with the intent to provoke a large police presence. 🚔 Targeted officials include Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Trump's nominee for ambassador to the UN, and former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), his pick to lead the EPA, Axios' Andrew Solender reports. A family member of former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), Trump's now-withdrawn first choice for attorney general, was targeted, law enforcement said. Go deeper.

I agree with everything you say, and in my view it's even worse than that: I believe it's a basic hypocrisy for someone to say they are pro-life when in fact they will accept the abortion of healthy babies—babies who could be birthed, cared for, raised, and live good full lives just as much as any other healthy baby—based only on their circumstances of conception. A person who is truly, honestly pro-life would advocate for the protection of those babies, too. But so many who say they are pro-life do not advocate for them. Why not?

I don’t know what the confusion is here. If you find a rape-incest exception to allow the abortion of healthy babies to be acceptable, you’re not pro-life. Simple as that.

You can hide from the issue all you like, but here’s the bottom line: the only legitimate position with integrity a pro-life person can have is no abortion for rape, no abortion for incest, period, no exceptions. Because if it’s really about protecting the life of babies, as the pro-life position repeatedly claims, there’s no other position you can have and not be hypocritical about it. If you support the killing of a perfectly healthy baby because it was conceived under certain circumstances, but forbid the abortion if it was conceived under other circumstances, then you are not pro-life. You are anti-women having a choice.

I know, wasn’t it the best? This might actually be the earliest film talking about Baseball in terms of the proper way to play it, using major leaguers as examples.

Supporting your state laws means you do support allowing abortion in cases of rape or incest. Since you support abortion for women and girls in cases of rape or incest, that means your concern really isn’t about the life of the child, is it? Because if it were, you would recognize that a perfectly healthy life conceived by rape or incest is just as much a life made by God as a life conceived by a man and his wife in their marriage bed. If you have different standards for when a woman should be allowed to obtain an abortion—no way if she consented to sex, yes it’s fine if she did not consent—that would explicitly mean your concern is primarily about how the woman engaged in sex and conceived the baby in the first place, and not as much about whether the fetus is a life worthy of protecting, even if perfectly healthy. Is this truly your position?

Do you support allowing abortion in cases of rape or incest?

Here is an amazing 30-minute film from 1934 called, “Play Ball“, which features some of the greatest players in of the time, including Mel Harder, Tommy Bridges, Schoolboy Rowe, Ted Lyons, Lefty Grove, the Ferrell brothers, Charlie Gehringer, Al Simmons, Jimmy Dykes, Rogers Hornsby, Lou Gehrig, Jimmie Foxx, Hank Greenberg, Babe Ruth, Joe Sewell, Sam Rice, Earl Averill, Connie Mack, Mickey Cochrane, Frankie Frisch, and Dizzy Dean: The last three minutes includes footage from Games 2 and 6 of the 1934 Series being played in Detroit. Some of the more amazing things you will see are the various pitching and batting motions the players exhibited 90 years ago. With only a few exceptions, none of them like anything like the players of today. Another notable thing that the film is underwritten by Fisher Body.