Jump to content

chasfh

Members
  • Posts

    21,780
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    162

Everything posted by chasfh

  1. Except we don't want as Spork situation where Jace Jung comes up well before his time and he fails hard and it's hard on his psyche. I'm pretty sure this front office won't do that.
  2. Holy ****, they're telling us that when Trump is elected he's going to have Biden's home raided and murdered within.
  3. Super on-brand.
  4. He missed the class at police academy about who he can bring the hammer down on and who to let go.
  5. Jace Jung might end up coming up sooner than later, although he'll likely hit a ceiling at the plate once he were to get here, and he has a stone for a glove at third in Toledo right now. So who knows.
  6. He didn't lift a ball for us in the final two months of 2017, so Perez was probably damaged goods from the knee which was almost certainly covered up by the Astros, something the Fangraphs guru probably couldn't have known when he wrote his assessment that offseason.
  7. Then he let the team go fallow for a decade with no apparent end in sight. I think he might have cared more about the Red Wings at that point because that's when they started really winning.
  8. And people wonder why top free agent hitters don't want to come here ...
  9. Also Willy Adames, a well-rounded shortstop who very quietly (to us) has fashioned a 20-win career into the age 28 season. And don't get me going on Isaac Paredes, an unforced error at the very end.
  10. Fun fact: Franklin Perez is now pitching for the Gary SouthShore RailCats of the non-affiliated American Association, where he has pitched 4-1/3 innings in three games and has given up eight hits, five walks, and eight earned to an 0-1 record and a 16.62 ERA. Serious question: how much was Franklin Perez a mirage, and how much was he merely ****ed up by Avila administration coaching? Because even the prospect guru at Fangraphs thought the following winter that Perez projected to be an "above-average big-league starter", albeit with "a bit more developmental distance to travel than you might think given his level". Maybe we'll learn someday.
  11. If/when they do that, protesters will die. Simple as that.
  12. But trickle down ... Not only does this not surprise me, but wage theft happened to me when I was minimum wage in the 70s. 3. "These are crimes" By Emily Peck Illustration: Maura Losch/Axios 41% of hourly workers in California said they experienced at least one serious labor law violation, including wage theft, over the past year, finds a new survey, conducted by researchers at Harvard and UC San Francisco. Why it matters: These violations, like failing to pay overtime, undermine the economic security of low-income workers. The big picture: California has some of the best worker protection laws in the country, going beyond federal requirements — the state requires overtime pay for hourly workers who work longer than eight hours a day. But those protections are just on paper, and the data on whether employers comply is flawed. How they did it: The researchers surveyed about 1,000 workers at 98 large service industry employers (think fast food, grocery stores and retail). The serious violations included not getting paid overtime, being made to work off the clock, or getting paid less than the minimum wage — effectively wage theft. "These are crimes. People have experienced theft of their time, of their wages," says Daniel Schneider, the survey's co-author and a public policy professor at the Harvard Kennedy School. Zoom in: Typically, information on violations comes from worker reports to state and federal agencies. The new survey finds that just 22% of workers report labor violations — and when they do lodge complaints, it's typically to their employer. Part of the problem is that workers fear retaliation for speaking up. Zoom out: It's common to survey the victims of other types of crimes. Companies in the service sector often put out reports on shoplifting and shrinkage. But when it comes to wage theft and labor violations, as Schneider points out, "we have very little to go on." The bottom line: This is a start.
  13. Twenty-nine-year-old Willie Hernandez still looks like he was in his 40s in 1984.
  14. Grid willing we will never find out.
  15. That’s got to be a joke.
  16. The Tigers are a 5-13 team at the moment, and they were flat to awful against a division rival, so I can see why folks are antsy. Good thing they're getting on a plane tonight and getting back on the horse tomorrow.
  17. Speaking of spending money, I'm sure Prince Fielder would take another 9/214 to come back here.
  18. We didn't get Canha to build around him. We got him because we needed someone to put on the field this year. No matter what, you gotta try to put the best team on the field that you can manage to.
  19. I can only imagine what we'll be saying two years from now! "Not enough Colt Keiths", probably!
  20. Look, I really don't like the kind of interpersonal drama you appear to thrive on, and I want to spare the people any more of whatever this is, so maybe we should just part as friends while we still can. Best of everything to you. Go Tigers, Go Biden.
  21. This ⬆ after this ⬇ In which you're essentially challenging me to deny that these are all genius moves! 💀💀💀 And I answered the question on Tarik Skubal, which was all I ever brought up, in exhaustive detail. But just to answer your other questions from that same post: Kerry Carpenter in the 19th round? Not a genius move. Tarik Skubal in the 9th round? No. Jason Foley? Signed as an undrafted free agent? No. Colt Keith in the 5th round? No. Beau Brieske in the 27th round? No. Reese Olson, obtained in trade for Daniel Norris? No. Wenceel Perez, signed as a 16 y.o. free agent in 2016 for $550K? No. None of these are genius moves, in my opinion. But if you think they're genius moves, or if you don't, either way, that's fine. I won't yell at you for it.
  22. as soon as she said she wasn't going to, everyone knew that meant she was going to.
  23. Both-siders and independents will be quick to point the finger at the mainstream media for this, meaning at anyone that's not the right-wing media universe. But I would bet you dollars to dimes that if we could break down the responses based on where people get their information, we'd see numbers a lot closer to the truth among consumers of MSM than among consumers of RWM.
  24. Oh, come on, what's not inspirational about this?
  25. We could do this exact thing and still have our best record since 2016.
×
×
  • Create New...