GalagaGuy

Guy who can't spell in an age where spell check exists says other posters are something something.

You can't be asking this seriously. Why would you think you can do that?

Wearing blue pants and a light blue shirt and a silly hat is somehow identification though, right? You also need to stop with this notion that "name and badge number" is some kind of national standard, it's not. It's also nonsense to say that these officers are just set free every morning to go out rounding up random people with no accountability.

Not at all. It is a bald faced lie to say that these officers are not identifiable. They are actually more identifiable as your typical officer isn't wearing POLICE in big bold letters across their body. I get it though, for some reason you have a problem with plain clothed police officers going after people in the country illegally but are perfectly fine when they arrest citizens.

Not sure about you but I was born here so I'm pretty sure the Constitution that was referenced earlier covers me.

Absolutely we should go after people that employ people who are not in the country legally. Suggesting that we stop enforcing immigration laws until that happens is kind of silly though, don't you think?

*POLICE written across their chest and back *Unidentified Choose one 🤔

Oh so youre one of those people. Tell me, do you pull the "you work for me" when you get pulled over? As I already pointed out, it is common for some law enforcement to wear civilian clothing so spare me the fake ass outrage because immigration officers are doing it. Never heard anyone complain about undercover officers arresting gang members in Detroit.

The fact that they had no criminal convictions has nothing to do with being in the country illegally. You are intentionally trying to conflate things.

I must have missed the part in the Constitution where it says you can't arrest an illegal with warrants.

Why is 100% of your attention on the officers and 0% of it on the person in the country illegally?

See, this is why i don't bother posting proof. Even after you get shown proof, you say it's not good enough and suggest it might be faked.

The trifecta of talking points is complete.

See, now I know you're just not even the least bit interested in the facts. If you were, you would know all about the doxxing going on and wouldn't be pulling a Trump saying it's fake news. Here is just one of many websites set up to doxx federal law enforcement. https://icelist.is/

They have masks covering their faces for two reasons. 1. Their agency allows it 2. They are being doxxed and harassed by the pro-illegal crowd Seriously, you know this so stop playing games.

What do you think, life is like the Dukes of Hazzard and the police can't touch you if you reach the county line?

They literally have POLICE all over their vest and in some cases, the sleeves of their shirt. It is just flat out nonsense to say that a reasonable person would have no way of knowing that the 6 guys surrounding them in the middle of the day in public are actually law enforcement. It is the most ridiculous talking point and it needs to stop.

You are not nearly as clever as you think you are.

I don't see you answering so spare me the BS. Hilarious that you call me a bootlicker simply for stating the facts about what happened in this particular case.

Illegal ass taste yummy?

Have you ever tried to restrain a person that doesn't want to be restrained? It can easily take 4+ people to finally get them into cuffs.

SWAT and other special operations type officers often wear masks to hide their identities. Funny thing, I don't remember anyone complaining about that. It's only when they started wearing masks to arrest people in the country illegally that people flipped out. Again, just a silly talking point being used by the people who are suddenly pro-illegal for whatever reason.

They didn't beat the guy unconscious or shoot him so it seems there was "some level of restraint". Are you just mad about the liberal comment so now you're going to nitpick every detail about this case? Question for you, should this guy that was arrested be removed from the country?

Well first of all, it was two officers initially. Is that acceptable to you of should the police have to face off 1v1 with a suspect when trying to get them into cuffs? Efficient would have been if the suspect placed his hands behind his back once being told he was under arrest. I get it though, it's his right to not only be here illegally with a deportation order and outstanding warrants, but to also fight law enforcement.

Hold up, what exactly do you think "targeted" means here? What is means is they have a name and are going to arrest that person specifically. That's exactly what they did here. I'm very curious to hear what you think "targeted" means.