lordstanley Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM Author Posted yesterday at 03:12 AM Skinner’s only 26, he has potential. I agree though that at the moment net continues to be Edmonton’s weakest link. Bouchard is no Quinn Hughes, but from #10 overall in that infamous draft he is way better than Zadina. Quote
buddha Posted yesterday at 12:49 PM Posted yesterday at 12:49 PM 9 hours ago, lordstanley said: Skinner’s only 26, he has potential. I agree though that at the moment net continues to be Edmonton’s weakest link. Bouchard is no Quinn Hughes, but from #10 overall in that infamous draft he is way better than Zadina. zadina ranks 39th by point shares in that draft. suprisingly, that's better than joe veleno, who ranks 44th... Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 17 minutes ago, buddha said: zadina ranks 39th by point shares in that draft. suprisingly, that's better than joe veleno, who ranks 44th... Zadina used to have the occasional game where he was active enough that you knew he was one the ice. Just not many. Quote
buddha Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 11 hours ago, lordstanley said: Skinner’s only 26, he has potential. I agree though that at the moment net continues to be Edmonton’s weakest link. Bouchard is no Quinn Hughes, but from #10 overall in that infamous draft he is way better than Zadina. every rumor i hear was that they were going to take bouchard over hughes if zadina wasnt there. Quote
lordstanley Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago 57 minutes ago, buddha said: every rumor i hear was that they were going to take bouchard over hughes if zadina wasnt there. I was wondering about that. Was it Bouchard? Or wasn't it Dobson? I don't think it was Bomqvist. Quote
Shinzaki Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago I recall the talk being around Bouchard or Dobson ...I wonder if Zadina "falling" to them handcuffed them a bit. Most people thought he was going to be top 3 for certain, did Kenny and the boys scout him as heavily as they might have scouted the guys that were ranked a little lower? Quote
buddha Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Shinzaki said: I recall the talk being around Bouchard or Dobson ...I wonder if Zadina "falling" to them handcuffed them a bit. Most people thought he was going to be top 3 for certain, did Kenny and the boys scout him as heavily as they might have scouted the guys that were ranked a little lower? given late stage kenny's many first round failures, it wouldnt surprise me if they did scout him extensively and just failed in their evaluations. otoh, kenny seemed to miss by just going for size over everything else (rasmussen, etc), and that is definitely not zadina. seems like that draft was two players (zadina and veleno) who had high pedigrees dropping and kenny picking them rather than realizing they might have been falling for a reason. Quote
slothfacekilla Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago All the chatter I've seen about that draft is that if Zadina hadn't fallen the Wings were taking Bouchard and not Hughes. Quote
lordstanley Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago Of all teams, why did Hughes have to be picked by the Canucks. It has been the bane of my existence, brought up on a monthly basis by Canucks fans here I barely even know. As if it's some breaking news revelation that, yes, we should regret picking Zadina over Hughes. Duh. And none of them are aware that, as mentioned in this thread today, the pick was likely never going to be Hughes anyways. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 18 minutes ago, slothfacekilla said: All the chatter I've seen about that draft is that if Zadina hadn't fallen the Wings were taking Bouchard and not Hughes. Not that missing Bouchard is particularly less painful. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.