Hart Posted Friday at 12:40 AM Posted Friday at 12:40 AM I wonder if we are playing too many guys significant minutes. And Duncan Robinson was not even in the lineup. I know they want to reward Jenkins and Green for what they did earlier this year. But at some point, we are going to need to live or die with Ivey. Also, Cade's three point shooting this year is becoming something to watch. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Friday at 01:46 AM Posted Friday at 01:46 AM (edited) 21 hours ago, Deleterious said: I would get ready for a lot of zone in the playoffs. With the speed this team can put on the floor all they need to defeat a zone is....(checks notes) spacing... 😉 Edited Friday at 01:46 AM by gehringer_2 Quote
Deleterious Posted Friday at 02:50 AM Posted Friday at 02:50 AM 30% of his shots are a shot he only makes 30% of the time. Everyone wants to score from three and at the rim in today's game. Cade shoots below average from both locations. Quote
Betrayer Posted Friday at 07:38 AM Posted Friday at 07:38 AM When you're trying to replace your only pure shooter in the lineup, the answer is Lanier, not Jenkins. It doesn't matter that he's a rookie, he's just a qualified as a 2-way player and they're basically the same age. it's all about the archetype you're looking to replace. And I like Jenkins, but he's a backup PG. His role is playing the 13 minutes Cade doesn't play. Let him cook against bench players and be a spark for the reserves. Let him grow into your Jose Alvarado.. I didn't think I would dislike LeVert this much. Even when he's playing well, his flailing limbs and head-down dribble make me seriously unhappy. In a game like this, it's infuriating. JB keeps going to him in the clutch and it's a terrible move. Two things can be true. We can lack shooting and also need to have Ausar in the lineup as much as possible. This team's best offense is defense and you don't have to fight the zone when you're in transition. Not to mention that a zone sucks for defensive rebounding so Ausar's offensive rebounding is very important. We were a huge net positive in his minutes just as we were in the playoffs last year when JB sat him. Play the man 30+ mpg! Quote
Deleterious Posted Friday at 09:11 AM Posted Friday at 09:11 AM About due for a Beasley post on IG. Him saying, "I bet you're wondering why I'm eating these Better Made Chips and drinking this Vernors. You'll find out soon" Quote
1984Echoes Posted yesterday at 04:10 AM Posted yesterday at 04:10 AM (edited) On 12/3/2025 at 6:50 PM, Deleterious said: Would ya? On 12/3/2025 at 8:37 PM, Sports_Freak said: I wouldn't do it even if he was healthy. Thats just too much... This was my second thought. My first thought was: "Looks like a Herschel Walker trade... to me." So... no. But another thought occurred to me during tonight's game... as KP was throwing up 32 points... Milwaukee will say no to these changes... But here I go anyways: Harris, Ivey, Holland, LeVert for Giannis & Kevin Porter Jr. Plus (4) 1sts and the (3) 1st round swaps... plus we have 12-14 2nd rounders over the next 7 years... In the years we lose our 1sts in this trade we keep our highest 2nd rounder, they get all the remaining 2nd rounders. If they say no, c'est la vie. If that trade actually gets done (a shock to mine and everyone's system?): Looking at it from the Piston's Roster: Cade-KPJ-Ausar-Giannis-Duren start. I would take that starting 5 over any in the NBA. Pushed to the bench: Stew-Duncan-Paul Reed at PF?, maybe KPJ has to run all the bench PG minutes so is a little bit staggered with either Cade or KPJ always on the floor? And somehow, some additional guard minutes needed between Lanier-Jenkins-Sasser-Javonte Green? Bench might be a bit of work-in-progress but I think we could get it to a serviceable level... But that's the Giannis trade I would sign off on. Would Milwaukee? EDIT (Just some minor grammar changes...) Edited yesterday at 05:07 AM by 1984Echoes Quote
buddha Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM i'm not trading for giannis because he's likely seriously injured. and will be a free agent soon. Quote
Deleterious Posted yesterday at 04:39 AM Posted yesterday at 04:39 AM 4 minutes ago, buddha said: i'm not trading for giannis because he's likely seriously injured. and will be a free agent soon. The injury is a concern, free agency probably not. Some reported Milwaukee is not opening this up to the entire league. They would work with him to send him where he wants to go. It wouldn't shock me if there was an extension agreed to before the trade even happens and signed immediately after. Quote
buddha Posted yesterday at 05:04 AM Posted yesterday at 05:04 AM 24 minutes ago, Deleterious said: The injury is a concern, free agency probably not. Some reported Milwaukee is not opening this up to the entire league. They would work with him to send him where he wants to go. It wouldn't shock me if there was an extension agreed to before the trade even happens and signed immediately after. if theyre going to trade him where he wants to go, he aint coming here. 1 Quote
1984Echoes Posted yesterday at 05:09 AM Posted yesterday at 05:09 AM 4 minutes ago, buddha said: if theyre going to trade him where he wants to go, he aint coming here. Cade should give him a quick call... Quote
1984Echoes Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago On 12/3/2025 at 8:19 PM, Sports_Freak said: Was Giannis out all that time because of a leg injury? It looked like an Achilles type injury now, no contact, he just dropped. Edit; he had a strained left adductor. Best I can tell, thats in the hip. Injuries like that can lead to further injuries if not allowed to heal. I hate to see star players hurt. Bucks site says it is only a calf strain. Out a few weeks. So not serious. Although with age... The injuries, even minor ones, start to pop up more frequently... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.