chasfh Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Tiger337 said: If 26 teams decide to do it now, then it's fine. It's probably pretty close to that right now, anyway. Quote
buddha Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, chasfh said: Just like twenty-six teams CHOSE not to do so in 1987, too. i dont understamd your point. if tampa bay decides not to sign expensive, over priced free agents, that's not collusion. if other teams see that and decide not to do so, that's not collusion either. let the mets and co overspend. you dont need to do so to be successful. Quote
tiger2022 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 8 hours ago, Sports_Freak said: Agreed. But hopefully, Perez will be benched and Flaherty will be replaced in the starting rotation. Melton is on his way back, maybe Sunday? Flaherty isn't getting taken out of the rotation. They already don't have enough starters and they are paying him $20 million this season. Quote
JackMorrisStache Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 17 hours ago, tiger2022 said: Cleveland has the advantage against Detroit in offense, starting pitching, bullpen , defense, and manager. For like the 10th straight year. And they are spending $130M less for it. https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll Quote
Sports_Freak Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 hours ago, tiger2022 said: Flaherty isn't getting taken out of the rotation. They already don't have enough starters and they are paying him $20 million this season. If JV comes back effectively and Skubal and Melton pitch well with Jack still struggling? I could see him being the odd man out. But yeah, the money... Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago He’s getting the money regardless. Just find a spot on the team where he will hurt us the least. Quote
tiger2022 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, Sports_Freak said: If JV comes back effectively and Skubal and Melton pitch well with Jack still struggling? I could see him being the odd man out. But yeah, the money... Flaherty is still much better than Verlander. As long as the Tigers still think about playoffs, they don't want Verlander anywhere near the mound. Quote
Sports_Freak Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, tiger2022 said: Flaherty is still much better than Verlander. As long as the Tigers still think about playoffs, they don't want Verlander anywhere near the mound. Is Flaherty better than JV? IDK, JV hasnt been healthy. Flaherty isnt very good, if it comes down to him or Montero, who would you rather see? The money Flaherty is making gives him a very long leash but he's horribly inconsistent. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.