Motown Bombers

This really confirms what I suspected. Williams overplayed his hand and the Lions moved on.

Even from your link: "Quinn — who was part of the New England Patriots' front office when the team took Jimmy Garoppolo in the second round of the 2014 draft (with a 36-year-old Tom Brady on their roster) — said Tuesday he has not ruled out taking a quarterback in the first round."

Right, he said he wasn't trading Stafford. The fact is, he couldn't for three reasons: 1. Ownership gave him a mandate to make the playoffs 2. It would have been an over $30 million cap hit if they did trade Stafford. 3. He was coming off a back injury in which he missed 8 games. It would be the ultimate sell low. He was putting to rest rumors they were trading Stafford. You don't want to upset your franchise QB just for a draft trade, which you don't seem to understand that teams would be trading to get ahead of the Giants and not whether they were keeping Stafford. It's also weird you don't have the same criticism for Campbell for making it known Goff is his guy. Anyways, saying you aren't trading Stafford does not mean that you aren't drafting a QB. Are you saying then if Holmes says Goff is not going to be traded that is telling the entire world they are not drafting a QB?

How did he do that? When he had Tua for a pre draft visit? When he contacted Saban about Tua's medical status?

I also know there were people who simply sat it out but would have voted for Hillary. I personally know more people who assumed Hillary was going to win and just didn't bother.

First lady, US senator, secretary of state, first female candidate of a major political party. Yeah, they'll know who she is. *EDIT* Well, maybe not in Florida since that will be banned from schools.

I still don't understand what made Clinton such a bad candidate and what made Stein or Johnson better candidates. It's also possible that people realized they screwed up and threw away their vote in 2016 and weren't going to do that in 2020. It's also why turnout was much higher in 2020. I'm not sure what makes Biden a significantly better candidate than Hillary. I still can't even wrap my head around the logic of wasting my time to vote for Johnson or Stein knowing both of them were going to lose. I suppose it would be for down ballot. Ron Johnson got about 70,000 more votes than Trump and Feingold got about the same as Hillary. In that case, if you don't like Trump, you could vote for Hillary since one of the two were going to win. Guess it's water under the bridge now. We just have to deal with those choices for generations now. When they have grandchildren, they can tell them I didn't vote for Trump I voted for Gary Johnson. When they ask who that it is, they can tell them I don't know but he's not Hillary Clinton and didn't have a private email server that we are aware of.

In 2016, the top two 3rd party candidates in Wisconsin received over 130,000 votes. In 2020, the top two received 43,000. Joe Biden won Wisconsin in 2020 by roughly the same margin as Trump did in 2016.

I don't watch MSNBC or any cable news for that matter. Given how close the election was, people voting for Jill Stein who we now know to be a Russian asset who was used to syphon votes from Hillary and it worked. Her vote total in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin was the difference in the election. No one voted for Stein because she was a good candidate. You admitted you voted for Johnson because of Hillary's emails. That's fine as long as you can live with your vote. Apparently back in 2016 a candidate who was suspected of colluding with Russia, mocked disabled people, talked about groping women, and whatever else I can't remember was basically the same as the email lady. Oh well, guess I'm your ignore list now? Apparently I must of been on it at one point, removed, and then back on? Perhaps you need to go outside and smell the flowers.

Well Edman said he voted for Johnson because of Hillary's emails. He 100% knew that Johnson was not going to win so what exactly was the point of the vote? What exactly made Johnson a better candidate other than he wasn't Hillary or Trump? Massachusetts doesn't matter so I guess it's ok to throw away your vote there.

That's fine. I hope you and others who voted for 3rd parties who had 0% chance of winning accomplished whatever it is you were looking to accomplish. That's fine you couldn't stomach her. Guess you can stomach Trump more. You admitted you voted for Johnson because of Hillary's emails. It apparently wasn't even anything about Johnson that won your vote.

Stein and Johnson combined for over 270,000 votes in Florida, more than double Trump's margin of victory. Stein had 51,000 votes in Michigan. Almost 5 times Trump's margin of victory. Stein had 31,000 votes in Wisconsin. Roughly 1.5 times Trump's margin of victory. Stein had 49,000 votes in Pennsylvania. 5,000 more than Trump's margin of victory. If these Jill Stein voters would have voted for Hillary, Roe would not be overturned, thousands fewer people die from COVID, and there would have been no insurrection. Hope these third party voters accomplished whatever it was they were looking to accomplish.

I didn't know what it was either, but when I found out, I knew it was something a presidential candidate should know.

I can't believe there were people out there who voted for either a Russian connected loonspud who thought wifi was a threat to your health or a guy who asked what an Aleppo was because of an email server.

Hopefully you're happy with your decision to waste your vote.

People saw a private email server as enough of an offensive to not vote for Hillary.

Keep in mind the Raiders have the whole Henry Ruggs thing so I can see them passing on Carter.

The Georgia legislature is moving through a bill that would allow them to remove Fanni Willis. You can forget about Georgia.