two questions about that law:
1) why would they be talking to first and second graders about sex and sexual orientation? theyre too young for that to be taught to then in school.
2) i imagine no one was really doing that, and this is simply a political overreaction designed to get attention for republicans (duh).
3) (one more thing...) the biggest problem with the law is the fuzzy language at the end of that paragraph that is open to interpretation. and by, open to interpretation, i mean that it could be interpreted that teachers are not allowed to teach about sexual orientation in any capacity should it be deemed not "age appropriate."
as with most hastily written, poorly thought out laws (i.e.: "laws"), it will be used and abused by lawyers to make a ton of money for themselves and for politicians to bring a ton kf attention to themselves, to no benefit to the public.