MichiganCardinal

I'm not going to claim to know how NFL contract negotiations go, but I am pretty confident in saying that the Bengals are the worst in the league at it.

Maybe 30 years ago this was true, and still today regarding your MAC and CUSA schools, but I think it’s probably fair to say that Michigan, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and most of the schools who are driving the new era of college football have more fans supporting them with eyes and money who have no real purely institutional connection. Today, kids just grew up in Royal Oak, Upper Arlington, or with a grandpa who went to Notre Dame, and chose a team based on that and them being consistently competitive, even if they end up going to Grand Valley, Toledo, Trine, or nowhere at all. I think the real barrier to the NFL ever actually taking over college football comes in infrastructure, politics, and purpose. The NFL is not going to want to bear the startup cost of a new league, be it stadiums, salaries, or just general upkeep. They’ve got a good thing going with the NCAA to NFL pipeline and I doubt they’re keen to rock the boat too much. If the NFL did want to chip away at the college football foothold (and they might in the next 5-10 years), I could see them taking a more MLB-like approach to recruitment, expanding both the draft and roster size while reducing or removing the eligibility requirements, to accommodate NFL team that wants to select players right out of, or shortly out of, high school. And then those kids would have the option of either accepting something of a “futures” deal with an NFL team, or going to college. I can’t imagine the list would be long of kids who NFL teams are willing to take at 18/19 years old, but it would give them the option of stealing a Bryce Underwood or Archie Manning from the college game. I just don’t think the NFL has any intention of reinventing the wheel, when they’ve already got the greatest money-making league in American history and no signs of slowing.

If things go well in Pittsburgh, his teammates will be fine with him and defend him. If things don't go well though, he'll have loaded the gun the teammates use against him. He's a prima donna whose best days are long past him, still relevant more for his stance on politics and antics than his talent. It's not a recipe for success.

The 2023 Dallas “loss” remains our last regular season road loss.

Yep. The NFCCG pissed me off because the win was there on the tee for the taking. The Commanders game was fluky in how poorly the offense performed, but I take sad solace in knowing the Eagles would have put 55+ on our depleted defense in the NFCCG. The reality is it just wasn’t going to happen last year. We should have been to the Super Bowl in 2024, and would have gone punch for punch with the Chiefs.

Not going to lie, kind of annoyed with Ragnow. Not for doing it, these guys go through hell and back. Can never blame a dude for stepping away. But to do it in June? Come on man.

(Not me but not far from me 😂)

hi

I think we are kidding ourselves if we don't think college sports died sometime in the last 20 years. When that exactly happened is probably up for debate but this isn't our father's college sports anymore. They're just finally getting around to burying the body.

We have Trey Hendrickson at home.

Lions have enough goal scorers, they don’t need a Shanahan. If anything they need a Chelios across from Lindstrom.

I haven't seen a ton of stress, but I agree it's a great team. To the extent there is stress it might just be anxiety at the notion of "standing pat" this offseason. They replaced Carlton Davis with DJ Reed, Kevin Zeitler with a rookie (or Mahagony), and didn't (or haven't) really addressed the relative weakness at edge across from Hutchinson. They should be just as good as they were week one last season, but they aren't really much better. Granted of course that it is nearly impossible to improve on a 15-3 roster. If 2025-2026 turns out how 2024-2025 did -- injury after devastating injury debilitating the team into a disappointing playoff exit -- it will ultimately be an equally disappointing finish. If they stay even relatively healthy though, there is no limit to how far this team can go. I'm excited to see what this team can do. I am very doubtful they will match their 15-2 mark from last year, and October into November has the real chance to be panic-inducing for a fanbase that hasn't lost a ton of games in the last two years. Packers, Bears, Ravens, Browns, Bengals, Chiefs, Bucs, BYE, Vikings, Commanders, and Eagles is just a truly insane start. Those teams went a combined 105-65 last season, and if you take out the Browns and Bears it's an absurd 97-39... If they can escape that gauntlet at 7-4, they'll be in excellent shape to hit an on-ramp to finish the season against the Giants, Packers, Cowboys, Rams, Steelers, Vikings, and Bears. I don't think it's even crazy to think they may come out of the first 11 weeks right around 0.500 and then finish the season 11-6 or 10-7 and be a wildcard team that absolutely no one wants to play.

Lions hat spotted in line to visit the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.

I think Kirk Cousins would the obvious replacement. But Goff isn’t going to get hurt anyway. 🙉🙉🙉

Good thing I’m not an admin because this kind of post would be worth like a week suspension in my book. 😆

The players won’t like this.

The clock stops on a 1st down under two minutes in the UFL. He was definitely down with a second left. As long as he made the line to gain, the clock stops then and Michigan can call their last timeout before it restarts.

The Cowboys trading for Pickens feels like the Bears trading for Claypool.

Just to put it on record, I'm a fan of the pick. Might even pick me up a TeSlaa jersey.

Fair. I was probably being a little hyperbolic, I'm sure I would care. My overarching point is that the owners totally botched the 1994-95 lockout, and have been just punting the problem down the line ever since. The state of Major League Baseball right now is that you have five teams (NYY, NYM, LAD, PHI, and TOR) that make up about 30% of the total market space in the league. On the other end of the spectrum, you have a handful of teams whose fanbases naturally want nothing to do with them right now because their ownership is a mess and either can't or won't spend like they need to (MIA, TB, OAK, COL, PIT, CIN - CWS and MIL as well to a certain extent as well). And then you have everyone else, who try as they might, will never spend with the upper echelon, and so has to just hope to have their farm system can knock it out of the park once every decade in order for them to make a run -- just for them to sell everyone and everything when it comes time to pay up. I do think it's fixable, but it's going to take a significant change, and I can't imagine any real fix happening without losing a season. I'm not smart enough to know all the solutions that are necessary, but I'm sure it is some combination of a floor, a cap, and revenue sharing.

I agree, and I would go a step further to say that I think the sport needs it. The owners need to enter the room and refuse to start negotiations without a salary cap. I don't care if they lose two seasons. They need to do it right. The way it's heading with this pay-for-play nonsense, it's going to be the Yankees, Mets, and Dodgers in a revolving door the next 5-10 years with billion dollar payrolls. The smaller markets, along with the cheap-to-reasonable owners (and I include Chris in that category) need to band together and say enough is enough. A year of only MiLB would also be a breath of fresh air. That's a more fun product to attend at a cheaper price.

Not a comment on DEI but on the university structure generally, it has always felt like bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy to me. The Department I used to work in, there were six people under the broad HR umbrella (including roles like student services, DEI, staff support, Dean of whatever, etc.) when like a dozen students major in the subject every year and there are single digit PhD students. There is no way the organizational structure made any fiscal sense, and the six jobs could probably realistically be done by two people. Cue Office Space, “so what exactly do you do here?” Of course, no one wants to be the university administration that shows up and just starts slashing positions though. So instead, they slash at the ground level, hiring decisions, when they need to recover from a budget deficit, hiring jobless PhDs to do the work of three GSIs. Make it make sense. So to the extent the elimination of some of these roles is an effort to make the largest employer in the State of Michigan more efficient and cost-effective for students, I’m all for it. Of course, that’s absolutely not the goal here, and in reality it’s all just the 21st Century flavor of racism at the national level.

His private home in West Bloomfield was also vandalized. Possibly on more than one occasion, I don't remember. I doubt the Regents had issues with him given that massive contract extension he signed less than six months ago.

Although I doubt this move has anything at all to do with sports, I do think it is a black eye on the university generally.