Jump to content

pfife

Members
  • Posts

    6,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by pfife

  1. 1) I said the likes of you. 2) I was posting in response to G2, as shown by the quote, who did say Isle Royal. Thus, not lying. Clearly. You should read what you're responding to (which you admit you don't) before responding.
  2. Was it a technicality when you used it?
  3. Again, she didn't speak with insufficient specificity. In the only actually quote found or posted of what she actually said, she said federal lands. A poster here made references to 1 National Park in Michigan, which is not synonymous with federal lands. The poster also directly stated that she said "parks" when she did not. ETA: Furthermore, even though it's a technicality to look at what someone actually said when discussing what was actually said...... she said this in the context of declaring a medical emergency. What is the impact of declaring the emergency on the legal aspects you posted? Since it's already been established that declaring emergency unshackles a president from Congress, as proven by Trump, why would the legal argument you're making persist?
  4. So you werent talking about the only national park in Michigan when you were talking about the only national park in Michigan?
  5. Accurately depicting what a person said isn't a technicality.
  6. She didn't speak with incomplete specificity. The only quote we have of her actually talking was from ABC's This Week (which I posted) - She said land, not parks. As for the point of the distinction - I didn't make a bunch of jokes about the policy being only applicable to Isle Royal so I'll defer to the likes of you and MB for why you made jokes about having to go to Isle Royal for an abortion if you could hypothetically go closer b/c there's no legal distinction between federal lands and federal parks.
  7. Yeah I know I won it. I don't need you to tell me that
  8. You posted 0 sources quoting her as saying national park. Did you read what you posted?
  9. 1) the tweet you posted clearly doesn't quote Warren on "parks" vs "land". I posted Warren's quote. 2) The WUTV article you posted also doesn't quote Warren on "parks" vs. "land". It quotes Caroline Kitchener about national parks, not Elizabeth Warren. I posted Warren's quote. You did not. 3) The KPIC article you posted appears to be a syndicated article that's almost the same as the WUTV article you posted which didn't quote Warren on parks vs. land, both of which are quoting the same person who composed the tweet you posted (and was quoted). I posted Warren's quote. You did not. The word "park" appears in the article 3 times. Once in the title (not a quote) another in a quote from Caroline Kitchener (not Liz Warren), and another time in the narrative of the article which is also not a quote from Warren. Essentially you posted 3 quotes all by the same person that aren't quotes from Warren re: Parks vs. Land - they're quotes from Caroline Kitchener about what she says Warren said. On the other hand, I posted a direct quote from Warren herself appearing on a national TV show. 4) You made a distinction between federal lands and federal parks and said she said one and not the other:
  10. No I just read your posts which you admit you don't do for me
  11. Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. She said federal land and I posted the quote. That was a distinction you posted that was in fact wrong.
  12. Feel free to not infer my intentions When you're here arguing that I'm the only one that insults dems... I don't need to change the argument. I merely need to quote you.
  13. Not only that but you literally lied about what Elizabeth Warren said. Just like you lied and said I didn't complement Nancy on the J6 hearings and had to admit I was right
  14. Here's just a sampling today of Democrats, their voters, and their policy ideas being insulted and blamed. Mostly by a purported Democrat who can't find anyone crapping on Democrats.... except me sayign they shouldn't unilaterally disarm.
  15. LOL Feel free to self examine
  16. IMO the fake emergency should be about healthcare which would include universal healthcare and also abortion coverage. That would be better than blaming leftists for losing
  17. Right. They also should declare a fake emergency instead of talking about how bad their own party is.
  18. I wish the dems focused on how bad the other party is instead of how bad their own party is.
  19. Cool story, post didn't apply to you then.
  20. It's kinda fun watching a bunch of people who've admitted and demonstrated they were Republicans or Republican voters in the past.... lecturing me on how to vote in order to avoid republican takeover. Maybe next I can watch the Detroit Lions give a seminar on winning Super Bowls. Anyways welcome to the shindig guys. I've been partying with these dudes since the late 90s when you guys were pushing for a W presidency. Just quit showing up and rearranging the furniture and shitting on everyone already here.
  21. presumptuous but maybe
  22. So republicans are going to vote republicans... so be it... but leftists shall vote Democrats or it's all their fault.... It would be awesome if you gave me as much autonomy over my vote as you give Republicans for theirs. I guess it's easier for you to relate to republican voters given your admitted history of voting Republican.... speaking of who's to blame.
  23. So to continue the metaphor, you're the one not paying attention to the gun problem?
  24. Or we could do what you did and push for republican candidates for decades and then blame everyone else when their appointees take away rights and run this MF'er into the ground.
×
×
  • Create New...