gehringer_2

M has been a year behind - I don't think M spent what OSU spent last year, but that was more for lack of being organized to do it. With the deal to Underwood they have certainly caught up. If the new 'deal' goes into place I would expect NIL to start falling off. In fact the NCAA is supposedly going to start enforcing some kind of 'value returned' standard for NIL, but we'll see is they do any better controlling that then they ever did with all the other money that oozed though Div I FB.

I had to laugh - there was blurb on infielders on ESPNs web site and the clip they had of Torres was him booting an easy ground ball...🤷‍♀️

the interesting question to think about is that unless the robots start demanding bank accounts of their own, AI and robotics will be increasing the productive capacity of the society - if the stuff works it will be mean that like every other period of innovation, capital will be applied to increase the overall net wealth generating capacity of the economy. Once you look at it in those terms, the issue is just as much how the political system distributes the rights to that wealth as what jobs everyone ends up doing.

Not the same questions - also what does "Satisfied he won the election" mean. I am perfectly satisfied he actually won the election in the sense that I don't doubt he did, I am not at all satisfied that he is president. Which question was being asked/answered, or was the ambiguity in the question deliberate? 🤔

just for accuracy here, Canada supplies about 60% of the oil we import (~8mbpd), but the oil we import is only about 40% of what we use (>20MBPD), so we import about 25% of the crude we use from Canada. Otherwise your point still holds 100%. All the gory details you would ever want are at EIA.gov

If there were a set a education, tax and investment policies to go with the tariffs, along with tax law reforms to make dismantling of industrial production companies less profitable by guys like Romney, then maybe selected tariffs would motivate re-shoring, but tariffs alone lead to fat, sloppy, non-productive concerns like the 70’s US auto industry. If you want to build production that can compete and actually provide US consumers with world class stuff attack the cost side as well as the price side. Improve the manufacturing environment too. The other thing that I think would make more sense than blanket tariffs would import excises based on pollution abatement or CO2 burden. It is unfair if we are buying stuff from overseas in cases where it’s only because the off-shores are operating in ways US producers would not be allowed to. That is one area where I don’t mind tariffs or excises. That’s usually given up as too hard to implement- good task for the AI guys to work on.

I don't know what this means - but good night and good luck.

Disclaimer: - this post contains political material - as it directly relates in an unavoidable way to the topic. No advocacy will be involved. So here is how I read what is going to happen with tariffs. Trump is going to prefer to keep the threat of unimplemented tariffs constantly on the front burner as his 'negotiating leverage'. Until that strategy runs its course to either success or futility, or wherever it ends, I don't expect to see much but symbolic tariffs actually put in place.

I support the right of someone to make an argument for the communist party - absolutely. Otherwise how are we better than Putin or Xi? Not to mention that the communist party in the US is about as toothless as a 90yr Babushka.

Seriously - It's a terrible thing, but how does that change the understanding of the purpose of the sacrifice? It's not the flag, it what the flag stands for isn't it? When we start to take symbols as more important than what the symbols represent, we are losing something in the translation somewhere. And isn't that the question when we fight in questionable causes? For the guys on the line it become more about 'the. mission' than what the mission is about, because who the hell knows what that was. And that make everything turn internal - so the guy burning the flag become the enemy, when he's just following the logic that created the flag in the first place.

I think the proper term for that in a free society is suppression of peaceful free speech. That's what you were supposed to be serving to protect. At least that's what the civics books used to say, when we still had them.

Just call it the "Joy of Cruelty." Seems to be the favorite emotion for Trump and his ilk.

so what would even come close to a 21st century equivalent of overturning the tables of the money-changers? It's all bits in the ether now. They've found a way to make their avarice outrage resistant in physical space. And if they ever taught their flocks the truth, they would understand that this kind of praise in the service of profit is exactly what the 3rd commandment is really talking about.

Life imitates art. Peter Sellers would be proud.

Santander to the Jays - in case someone else like me was wondering.....🤨

yeah - they've gotten themselves into a place where they can't serve an order fast enough to make any money. Death by a thousand menu choices.

I always felt that way too, and then when I realized I didn't any more the decision was easy.

You guys need to get your resumes into Ron Wood ASAP 🏈🏈🏈 🤣

speak for yourself. I'm not hoping he crashes the economy. I believe left to his own devices he would, but that's not the same thing!

The backsliding begins - Trump won't institute tariffs 'immediately" Gives himself a loophole big enough to drive a 4 yr administration through. Reality always sucks when you are a narcissist. -nyt

What the court says here is immaterial as to any actual truth of the matter. Only an individual himself can speak to his own admission of guilt or claim of innocence. It's strictly legalistic fictions that anything else could be true. Which of course is not to say that the SCOTUS isn't well steeped in legalistic fictions. And in terms of precedent, there likely is none because cases are specific, and one can only hope the American public will have learned by 2028 that it's a mistake to elect a person who carries on about an enemies list of otherwise innocent people. Well, that may be a little optimistic - we learned it once in 1974 and seem to have forgotten, but I suppose each generation has to learn it once for itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j95kNwZw8YY&ab_channel=MarcEder

Yup. The dirty little secret that modern welfare state governments (and yes, the US is a 1st world welfare state - we just aren't very good at it.....) need property and income taxes because they are stable. Sales taxes, excise taxes, tariffs, can all swing wildly with the business cycle leaving government budgets to swing likewise.

I'm only disappointed that since Trumps coin was $TRUMP, Melania's wasn't $TRUMPETTE.

Tariffs will act just like sales taxes in the sense that they will hit the bottom half of the income distribution hardest (as President Cleveland understood perfectly well a century ago). Just what the US income distribution needs is a Trillion in new taxes paid mostly by the underclass. We are doomed.