mtutiger

There are a lot of examples of media navel gazing, but the Harper's Letter may be the best example. Normal people don't have time for that ****

Something something cancel culture something something.

Says the guy who thinks Alex Berenson is any more reliable than any Joe Schmo sitting at the end of the bar.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/oct/29/alex-berenson/covid-19-death-rate-england-much-higher-among-unva/ I'm sure this constitutes an ad hominem as well.

I'm gonna go ahead and ignore it because I don't need Alex Berenson to tell me what to think about things.

Someone should ask Lew which parties Congresscritters/staff tend to be the ones refusing to be vaccinated.

Almost like WND isn't exactly a credible disseminator of news. Who knew?

Well known purveyor of fair and balanced news *checks notes* Conservative Tree House

I know ad hominems. Ad hominems have often been friends of mine. Senator, that is no ad hominem.

Gateway Pundit? Thats a throwback.

If you take him at face value, he wants to vote YES. Reports are that he even promoted an alternative bill (PreK for 10 Yrs, ACA Extension + climate) when he last met with the President. If you don't agree with him there, I'd argue you probably don't hold the same position he does.

By all accounts, Manchin seems to still be open to a bill, just not as constructed by the House. So if you are opposed to any BBB bill in any form, that would mean that you are not aligned with his perspective.

Will you be aligned with his perspective when he eventually supports a BBB bill? The situation with Manchin is really similar to Bart Stupak during the Obamacare... conservatives loved him when his concerns on public funding for abortion put the bill in peril, only to harass him and make death threats after eventually supporting the bill once his concerns were allayed. Similarly, conservatives like Manchin now, but will drop him like a hot rock when they eventually coalesce around a bill they can all agree on.

Of course, this guy's hot take assumes that McConnell isn't Majority Leader on the Earth 2.0 Sanders Presidency

Even setting aside the idea that job growth from renewables could be aimed at that sector, BBB also extends fees paid by coal companies toward victims of black lung. It goes against the narrative, but there are definitely incentives to support this legislation if one comes from a coal background.

He was just made permanent 1B coach as well.... terrible.

Every time I see him post, I'm reminded of how Jim Nantz called him "Cart Man" during the Cowboys Thanksgiving game lol

Now this is the kinda pressure you put on Manchin...

You made a post about how fears of fascism isn't enough to break through to the jobs voter - I respond back that climate may suffer from the same issue. I interpreted your comment about "jobs voters" as covering a wide spectrum, not just limited to progressive voters. So yeah, maybe climate appeals to progressive "jobs voters".... but does it persuade other "jobs voters"?

The Democrats only need progressive votes to win elections?

Obviously it's not abstract for progressives.... how about for people who are not progressive? That average person that fife speaks of who doesn't sit around and think about this stuff like we all do? I see what fife is saying with fears of fascism not being sufficient a platform to run on.... obviously he's correct. But I'd also argue that Democrats (progressives included) are generally pretty bad at marketing their platforms to the average person., and climate change may be one of the better examples of their ineffectiveness.

Couldn't the same thing be said about climate change funding in the BBB? Isn't that pretty abstract to the average person as well?