I suppose it could be true Jeimer didn't fit what the new administration wanted to do here, although I don't see how a guy who has a history of plus-D, pop from both sides of the plate, and the ability to take a walk doesn't fit what they want to do here. Seems like Jeimer has proven yet again he can deliver on all three.
Does all that really take a back seat to "defensive versatility"? I think that whole idea might be misunderstood. I really doubt Harris and Hinch believe that the way to win rings is by fielding twelve guys who can all play at least three positions on the diamond at random every game. I think it's more an issue of, the organization is in a very bad stretch right now where the only players available to us are marginal talents, many of whom have value only as utility players. They should be bench players at best on decent teams, which we are not right now, so we have no choice but to play guys like this every day. Might as well test them at various positions to see whether they can play well enough somewhere anywhere while we figure out whether we can go long with any of these guys (which, no real surprise, it looks like we won't be able to).
That's why I think we are swimming in utility players all playing multiple positions. I don't think it's our strategy to win in the future—I think it's more the only way at our disposal to survive and try to compete at this moment. Once we do get everyday players at third base and second base and in the corners on board, we won't need a multiplicity of the Zach McKinstrys or Andy Ibanezes or Tyler Nevins of the game moving around our diamond anymore.