Good. The umpire should have been suspended, too.
Look, the kid, who is no more than 21 years old, should not have been so demonstrative on the pitch before it. He should have known better, and If he would have been rung up on a pitch a couple inches off the plate, that would have been defensible. It would teach the kid a lesson while maintaining the veneer of credibility for the umpire. But calling him out on that pitch proved the call was obviously vindictive, not instructive. The conference couldn't not suspend the umpire, because who knows how much farther he would go on the next one. If he loses this job permanently, I don't think that would be the worst thing. He can take another umpiring job in a lesser conference and work his way back up. This should teach him a lesson.