Jump to content

Anybody Want Some Lithium (& other assorted items)?


1984Echoes

Recommended Posts

How fast are charging stations becoming mainstream? I don’t remember seeing any at state run rest stops in Virginia, Ohio, or even the Welcome Center on I-75 in Michigan. 
 

Hotels seem to be slow about adding them as well. I don’t remember seeing any this week at the “convention” parking lots in Grand Rapids this week.

I know DTW has a few. I’m not sure on the policy for travelers who use them on a long term basis. Do they turn their keys over to someone to move their car while they’re in Florida or wherever 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 1984Echoes said:

That's in the ballpark I named...:

720 miles, geographically available recharging stations wherever needed, 1/2 hour to recharge (15 min's wouldn't be needed as much if a full day's drive were within a battery, every overnight would get a full recharge...).

I picked 500+ because that’s the approximate range of most full gas car tanks today. But hey, 720 works for me, too! 👍🏼

I wouldn’t mind the idea of EV cars having a 50-or-so-mile second battery as a backup to get you to the next charging station, with a nag to keep you from relying on it too much, but just thinking it through for half a minute, I can see how that might be technologically challenging to do. Just a pie in the sky idea, nothing more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

How fast are charging stations becoming mainstream? I don’t remember seeing any at state run rest stops in Virginia, Ohio, or even the Welcome Center on I-75 in Michigan. 
 

Hotels seem to be slow about adding them as well. I don’t remember seeing any this week at the “convention” parking lots in Grand Rapids this week.

I know DTW has a few. I’m not sure on the policy for travelers who use them on a long term basis. Do they turn their keys over to someone to move their car while they’re in Florida or wherever 

 

The only hotel charging station I’ve seen was at a downtown Green Bay hotel maybe a year or so ago, there were three units, only one was not Tesla-oriented, and it was out of order. 

Also, downtown Savannah, GA has chargers placed along downtown streets at a few parking spaces. Great idea, especially if you live there, but expensive if you are traveling through in a full EV, and for me driving a hybrid across the country on 95% gas, not nearly as useful.

Edited by chasfh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said:

I wonder if there is any reluctance for charging stations to put in fast chargers because of potential liability claims from damaged/degraded batteries? Fast charging is still bleeding edge.

Bingo. They cook the battery. The battery is basically the chasis on EV's. You can replace cell blocks when they get cooked but you have to lift the cab off the chassis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2023 at 2:31 PM, Tigeraholic1 said:

I work for a fleet rental company. We had some big wigs from Ford come do a demo witht the new Ford E-Lightning. Seems fine until you get into winter or hot areas. When the temp dips below freezing or above 90 battery capacity usage drops by 30-40%. Plus he said the Ford Battery system allows for only 25 rapid charges in its life cycle after that you start boiling it and decrease life cycle. Unless you install the large 220 charger at home, standard wall plug charge equates 1 hour gets you 3 miles. 

I just don't see the current EV technology being a great plug and play right now. I did take one of the the lightnings home last weekend. They are nice to drive and having a Frunk (ford term, compartment where engine used to be) allows for nice secure storage space. I am heading to lunch with some clients in an EV Hummer in a minute, looking foward to checking it out. I will post some pics.  

The temperature issue is a huge problem for me.   They are not suitable everyday drivers in cold climates like Michigan.  It becomes terribly inefficient and expensive.   They go out of their way to hide that fact. 

The inefficiencies in the current mineral mining and battery technology probably makes the impact on the environment much worse than our current fossil fuels.    

I agree that once our technology advances in a decade or so, EV will be the way of the future.  The way it is being pushed and marketed to the public now is very snake oily.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know very little about batteries but there's a company out there named Our Next Energy (ONE) that is currently building a gigafactory in Van Buren Township that claims to double the range of current batteries and make them cheaper by using more abundant materials such as iron and magnesium instead of cobalt and nickle.    Range on their standard vehicle battery pack is advertised at 600 miles.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hongbit said:

agree that once our technology advances in a decade or so, EV will be the way of the future.  The way it is being pushed and marketed to the public now is very snake oily.

It's a chicken and egg thing. It's good to talk it up, get as many early adopters that the current tech can work for as possible, because volume and experience is what moves you along the learning curve.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MIguy said:

I know very little about batteries but there's a company out there named Our Next Energy (ONE) that is currently building a gigafactory in Van Buren Township that claims to double the range of current batteries and make them cheaper by using more abundant materials such as iron and magnesium instead of cobalt and nickle.    Range on their standard vehicle battery pack is advertised at 600 miles.   

"Lithium Ion" which more or less what's in your laptop computer and which uses cobalt has been most common so far but builders are starting to look more at Lithium Iron Phosphate. And there are a couple of other variations on Lithium chemistry challenging as well. As an example, LiFePO4 does not provide as high an energy density but it uses no cobalt, which makes it cheaper, may be capable of more cycles, and it is also much less prone to burning up your car. The thing about a car is that ultimate performance is not as important as reliability and life cycle cost. It made sense that early models went with the highest performing batts so they could market the biggest range numbers, but I would guess that as the market matures and people begin to  understand how they will use an EV in the real world, they will begin to shop smarter. People right now are obsessing about battery size, but that isn't really what matters for most people most of the time, it's only recharge time per mile driven that is going to matter in the end. A smaller battery is fine if it charges just as fast per mile driven, and charging is readily available - and you will go further per kWhr by saving the extra weight. And in fact since it is easier to move residual heat out of a smaller battery package as a practical matter they may achieve better max charge rates.

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said:

Another factor to take into consideration is the fatigued power grid. You have communities in the cold of winter and the heat of summer struggling with rolling brown outs. Now include most of these homes increasing load on the grid with powerful EV chargers. 

The grid needs upgrade in any event.   Among my concerns about a return to a semi-rural Michigan is the power grid's susceptibility to storm outages.  Bad enough that cable and water systems are constantly going down in Livonia where i pay a bill for my mentally handicapped sibling's condo.

Edited by romad1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walking the lot at lunch and I saw we have 50 EV Ford Lightning’s heading to Appalachian mountains for helicopter lineman. Google what these guys do it’s pretty wild! These have the extended range batteries and are AWD. They will all be pulling these pole trailers too. Surprised they are going into the field as actual working units rather than foreman trucks.

 

 

IMG_1475.jpeg

IMG_1474.jpeg

IMG_1473.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://nypost.com/2023/09/12/cops-called-after-jennifer-granholm-staffer-uses-gas-powered-car-to-hold-ev-charging-spot-for-biden-energy-secretary/

To help promote EV's and ease of long drives with them, she used an advanced team to hold charges open for when they got there.  Seriously no one could think of a PR nightmare holding up a charger could cause?  smh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ewsieg said:

https://nypost.com/2023/09/12/cops-called-after-jennifer-granholm-staffer-uses-gas-powered-car-to-hold-ev-charging-spot-for-biden-energy-secretary/

To help promote EV's and ease of long drives with them, she used an advanced team to hold charges open for when they got there.  Seriously no one could think of a PR nightmare holding up a charger could cause?  smh.

Should have sent out an MDOT crew to block the space while they repainted the lines or replaced the signage. Granholm needs to have her people talk to Chris Christie's people to learn how to do this kind of thing right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MIguy said:

Why not put little wind turbines on top of cars?  Not only will the battery charge any time the car is left sitting outside, it would have unlimited range while driving as the battery would constantly be recharging with forward motion.  

 

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics would like a word with you...

:classic_rolleyes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MIguy said:

Why not put little wind turbines on top of cars?  Not only will the battery charge any time the car is left sitting outside, it would have unlimited range while driving as the battery would constantly be recharging with forward motion.  

Magnets too!

Why wouldn't this work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, romad1 said:

This is a good development.   We can build batteries and cars without the PRC.  This was something I felt would bite Ford and the Gov in the ass if pursued without regard to the National Security implications.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/2023/09/25/ford-marshall-project/70964122007/

 

this is more about the UAW than China. Ford is just reminding TPTB of the loyal opposition that they can take their ball and go home anytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

this is more about the UAW than China. Ford is just reminding TPTB of the loyal opposition that they can take their ball and go home anytime.

The political price she would have paid allowing China to build a spy base in Michigan would be off the charts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...