mtutiger Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) 6 hours ago, guy incognito said: Who is saying "this is fine"? Edited 22 hours ago by mtutiger Quote
romad1 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 26 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Who is saying "this is fine"? That meme has been around for 10 years! Quote
mtutiger Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 30 minutes ago, romad1 said: That meme has been around for 10 years! But in relation to this ruling, who is saying "this is fine"? Just because someone adds additional context to the ruling doesn't mean they think "this is fine" Quote
mtutiger Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) Generally not a great sign when the lies are so big that even Joe Kernan doesn't want to touch then $6.00/gal gas? Double digit interest rates? What crack pipe is Scalise hitting? Edited 21 hours ago by mtutiger Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 27 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Generally not a great sign when the lies are so big that even Joe Kernan doesn't want to touch then $6.00/gal gas? Double digit interest rates? What crack pipe is Scalise hitting? It rhetoric a la Neil Simon. Through the pasta at the wall and take whatever sticks. Quote
mtutiger Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Tim Scott also appears to be hitting the crack pipe this morning Quote
chasfh Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 2 hours ago, mtutiger said: Who is saying "this is fine"? This guy. Quote
chasfh Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 12 minutes ago, mtutiger said: Tim Scott also appears to be hitting the crack pipe this morning I wonder whether the 100 million rank and file red hats are falling in line with this rhetorical strategy? @Tigeraholic1? Any insight from on the ground there? Quote
mtutiger Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: It rhetoric a la Neil Simon. Through the pasta at the wall and take whatever sticks. It's probably too much to ask but similar to the clip of Kaitlin Collins yesterday asking Trump whether he really believed the BS that he was saying about the definition of "86"ing.... folks interviewing these subjects really need to start mixing in more contempt in their responses to these sorts of answers. If for nothing else to match the contempt that these interview subjects show in putting out such transparently horse**** answers. Edited 19 hours ago by mtutiger 1 1 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 54 minutes ago, chasfh said: I wonder whether the 100 million rank and file red hats are falling in line with this rhetorical strategy? @Tigeraholic1? Any insight from on the ground there? Especially since his state had the highest gas increases in the country. Quote
romad1 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: Especially since his state had the highest gas increases in the country. 4 dimensional chess and so forth. Quote
romad1 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: It rhetoric a la Neil Simon. Through the pasta at the wall and take whatever sticks. Shots fired, 1970s and 80s prolific scriptwriter lies in the alley. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Hunter Biden, something, something, something. MAGAs have their own rules Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Working for Faux News is a prerequisite for lower level cabinet positions Quote
chasfh Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said: Working for Faux News is a prerequisite for lower level cabinet positions They’re supposed to be good on camera as mouthpieces for the regime, but not so smart that they have their own ideas about how things should be done. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.