Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Motor City Sonics said:

Andruw Jones is in the Hall and Lou Whitaker is not.   Come on, man

Kent was a worse choice than Jones.  Jones was questionnable and I wouldn't put him in, but he is perhaps the best defensive outfielder ever - better defensive numbers than Mays.  So, at least he's got that.  Kent played the same position as Whitaker and was 20 wins behind him in WAR.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

Kent was a worse choice than Jones.  Jones was questionnable and I wouldn't put him in, but he is perhaps the best defensive outfielder ever - better defensive numbers than Mays.  So, at least he's got that.  Kent played the same position as Whitaker and was 20 wins behind him in WAR.  

I mean, what is it?   He didn't talk to the Press?   Is that all this is?    I never heard he was rude about it.    Some guys just don't have anything to share.   Jim Rice is in.   He never became a manager because of the whole Press thing, but he's in.  I just don't get it.  It will always be a crime that Lou & Alan are not together.    

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RatkoVarda said:

Luis Robert to Mets for 2 blah prospects. Nice roll of the dice by the Mets. If Robert can play 100-110 games (huge ? mark there) could be impactful for them.

It works because he's got talent around him.   Obviously he's not the guy that makes other people better............I think the White Sox have made some smart moves too the last couple of years.   

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

Kent was a worse choice than Jones.  Jones was questionnable and I wouldn't put him in, but he is perhaps the best defensive outfielder ever - better defensive numbers than Mays.  So, at least he's got that.  Kent played the same position as Whitaker and was 20 wins behind him in WAR.  

Kent was a great choice.  Your argument is based on WAR and WAR alone.  

Kent was arguably the greatest offensive 2nd baseman.  .290 avg, 377 hrs, 1518 rbi, 1320 runs. .855 ops.  I know people hate all these stats now and just go by war, but who cares if Kent wasn't a Gold Glover or amazing base runner.

And just because they hate Whitaker and won't put him in the HOF doesn't mean Kent shouldn't be in there.

Edited by tiger2022
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, tiger2022 said:

Kent was a great choice.  Your argument is based on WAR and WAR alone.  

Kent was arguably the greatest offensive 2nd baseman.  .290 avg, 377 hrs, 1518 rbi, 1320 runs. .855 ops.  I know people hate all these stats now and just go by war, but who cares if Kent wasn't a Gold Glover or amazing base runner.

And just because they hate Whitaker and won't put him in the HOF doesn't mean Kent shouldn't be in there.

I care if he wasn't as great of a fielder or base runner.  Those are parts of the game and they count in determining a player's overall value.  People say that they don't care about fielding and base running and then they complain when the see fielders making bad plays or baserunning mistakes.  I used WAR in this case because Kent and Whitaker were similar types of players playing the same position and about the same number of games and WAR does a good job of showing that Whitaker was a better overall player.    And Kent was not much better as a hitter (123 OPs+ vs 118 OPS+).  Kent's value got pumped up because of his RBI totals.  It's not too hard accumulating a lot of RBI when you bat behind Barry Bonds!

Edited by Tiger337
Posted
39 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I care if he wasn't as great of a fielder or base runner.  Those are parts of the game and they count in determining a player's overall value.  People say that they don't care about fielding and base running and then they complain when the see fielders making bad plays or baserunning mistakes.  I used WAR in this case because Kent and Whitaker were similar types of players playing the same position and about the same number of games and WAR does a good job of showing that Whitaker was a better overall player.    And Kent was not much better as a hitter (123 OPs+ vs 118 OPS+).  Kent's value got pumped up because of his RBI totals.  It's not too hard accumulating a lot of RBI when you bad behind Barry Bonds!

" You can get into the HOF if you hit 377 HRs, .862 OPS, 139 OPS+ and are a slow base runner and a poor fielder?  Why didn't the Tigers let me play second base?   -- Signed Norm Cash" 🙂

Posted
6 minutes ago, Stormin said:

" You can get into the HOF if you hit 377 HRs, .862 OPS, 139 OPS+ and are a slow base runner and a poor fielder?  Why didn't the Tigers let me play second base?   -- Signed Norm Cash" 🙂

As you probably remember, Cash also had a rep as a good first baseman.  It's hard to measure firstbase defense, but the stats back up his reputation, at least in the 60s before he aged. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

As you probably remember, Cash also had a rep as a good first baseman.  It's hard to measure firstbase defense, but the stats back up his reputation, at least in the 60s before he aged. 

He was drafted as a running back by the Chicago Bears, so I don't know if Norm was that slow.  The left handed throws from second base would have been a challenge.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

I care if he wasn't as great of a fielder or base runner.  Those are parts of the game and they count in determining a player's overall value.  People say that they don't care about fielding and base running and then they complain when the see fielders making bad plays or baserunning mistakes.  I used WAR in this case because Kent and Whitaker were similar types of players playing the same position and about the same number of games and WAR does a good job of showing that Whitaker was a better overall player.    And Kent was not much better as a hitter (123 OPs+ vs 118 OPS+).  Kent's value got pumped up because of his RBI totals.  It's not too hard accumulating a lot of RBI when you bat behind Barry Bonds!

I imagine Bonds hit all those home runs for him too.  

The dude still did what he did, no matter how much you don't want it to be true.  

Also, Kent hit 3rd and Bonds hit 4th.  Whitaker had an actual HOFer hitting after him.  That Bonds fellow couldn't even make it in the HOF.

 

Posted (edited)

Pretty good article on active players and Hall chances.

 

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/baseball-hall-of-fame-active-mlb-players-locks-on-track/

 

Tarik Skubal
Skubal won the American League Cy Young in both 2024 and 2025, making him the first repeat AL winner in more than two decades. Coming off his age-28 season, he's set himself up pretty well to possibly win a third Cy Young; every pitcher who has done that so far is either in the Hall of Fame (Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux, Steve Carlton, Pedro Martinez, Jim Palmer, Tom Seaver, Sandy Koufax), is connected to PED (Roger Clemens) or isn't yet eligible for the Hall (Clayton Kershaw, Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander).

Further, the only pitchers to have won two Cy Youngs before their age-29 season are Clemens, Maddux, Kershaw, Martinez, Seaver, Tim Lincecum, Johan Santana, Bret Saberhagan, Denny McLain and Skubal. 

With 54 wins, and 889 strikeouts in 766 ⅔ innings, Skubal needs to stockpile a ton more counting stats, but there's plenty of time for that. He's been the best pitcher in the world the last two seasons -- or at least neck-and-neck with the next guy we'll discuss -- and if he keeps that going for four or five more years, he'll be in great shape for the Hall of Fame."

Edited by NorthWoods
Posted (edited)

WAR per 162 game average:

Keith Hernandez 4.7

Will Clark 4.6

Mark Teixeira 4.4

Jack Clark 4.3

John Olerud 4.2

Miguel Cabrera 3.9

Don Mattingly 3.8

Guess the one that is a sure fire 1st ballot HOFer and guess which ones have zero chance at making the HOF?

All the guys played at least 15 years.  And Kent has the same WAR per 162 games as Cabrera, 3.9

 

Craig Nettles, 68.0 WAR, 22 years, 4.1 per 162 games

Miguel Cabrera, 67.2 WAR, 21 years. 3.9 per 162 games.

Buddy Bell, 66.3 WAR, 18 years, 4.5 per 162 games.

 

 

Edited by tiger2022
Posted
19 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

I imagine Bonds hit all those home runs for him too.  

The dude still did what he did, no matter how much you don't want it to be true.  

Also, Kent hit 3rd and Bonds hit 4th.  Whitaker had an actual HOFer hitting after him.  That Bonds fellow couldn't even make it in the HOF.

 

Bonds batted third and Kent batted fourth in the years when Kent was getting a lot of RBI.  I just looked it up on b-ref to make sure I was remembering correctly.  I also remember they gave Kent credit for protecting Bonds which was silly. 

Kent did what he did...he was very good, but was overrated because writers love RBI.  He's not the worst Hall of Famer ever, but there are a couple of second basemen who should have been in before him.  One of them is Whitaker.  

I am not sure what point you are trying to make with Trammell batting behind Whitaker.  

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

WAR per 162 game average:

Keith Hernandez 4.7

Will Clark 4.6

Mark Teixeira 4.4

Jack Clark 4.3

John Olerud 4.2

Miguel Cabrera 3.9

Don Mattingly 3.8

Guess the one that is a sure fire 1st ballot HOFer and guess which ones have zero chance at making the HOF?

All the guys played at least 15 years.  And Kent has the same WAR per 162 games as Cabrera, 3.9

 

Craig Nettles, 68.0 WAR, 22 years, 4.1 per 162 games

Miguel Cabrera, 67.2 WAR, 21 years. 3.9 per 162 games.

Buddy Bell, 66.3 WAR, 18 years, 4.5 per 162 games.

 

 

WAR per 162 game average is not particulatly interesting and it kind of goes against the point of WAR which is a cumulative stat. 

Cabrera will be first ballot because of how great of a hitter he was at his peak.  I really wish his last 7 years were not trash, because he looked like he was going to be in the Hank Aaron or Frank Robinson class.  

Edited by Tiger337

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...