Sports_Freak Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said: I'm seeing a more complaints that the cost is pricing middle class kids out of youth hockey. My friend's son played 15-20 years ago so I imagine the price has only gone up. When I was a kid, in the early '70's, our city had an outdoor rink in a local park. There were pickup games every day and night. But back then, there were a lot more kids. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 hours ago, Sports_Freak said: My son never had any interest in playing ice hockey but I had a really good friend and his son played. He used to tell me how expensive it was as well as all the very early morning practices. Youth hockey was crazy even when I was a kid. My best friend played in a league and it used consume is life during the winter. It didn't seem like fun. I imagine is was pretty expensive too. Quote
Sports_Freak Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 53 minutes ago, AlaskanTigersFan said: I guess I wasn't really clear. I think with MLB players now making $60 mil/year and Hockey players maxing out at $10 mil per year, how do we get MLB to be reasonable? $25-35 mil is a lot of money and should be superstar per year money, but not $60. But how do we go back from this? This is the argument that will ruin baseball. Before these deals, I think there was a legit chance to have a collective bargaining agreement next year. Now, I don't see how it's possible..... How will the owners get a salary cap when some players are making $60 million a year? It's not really possible unless your cap is like $500+ million per year which is totally unrealistic.... I could see a cap being $300 or lower. But you got 28 players and one person making $60 million, that's 20% of your payroll. I guess if you can fit 25 other players under the $240 it'd be possible..... And then it turns into how much do minor leaguers play into the cap? It's turned into a real mess and rather quickly..... People have been complaining about player salaries in baseball for over 100 years. And I agree, it's totally crazy. It really, really bums me out that there's a very real possibility that my favorite team is going to lose one of baseball's best pitchers. Tarik Skubal should be a Tiger for life, in a perfect world. But that doesn't mean I want the Tigers to spend $40m (or more) to keep him. That kind of money could really hurt a franchise. Quote
Sports_Freak Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: Youth hockey was crazy even when I was a kid. My best friend played in a league and it used consume is life during the winter. It didn't seem like fun. I imagine is was pretty expensive too. 5 AM practices, 60 miles away? No thsnks. The teams had to rent the least expensive rinks at the least expensive times. I get it but I'm just glad my son had no interest in it. He played Little League baseball, wrestled and played high school football. That was plenty to keep him (and us) busy... Quote
Edman85 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Tony Paul had a good interview with DD's former arbitration guy (and as I mentioned in another thread, good twitter follow) in audio form that was posted today. Interesting stuff I never really realized about the incentives of the arbitrators themselves. (It's a cushy job for them, so they don't want to piss either side off and lose it). He also mentioned, the dates of the hearings are not announced in the public so that the arbitrators aren't able to do research ahead of time on players as they come in. The first hearings could be this week. Alternates between Florida and Arizona, and it looks like the trials will be in Arizona this year (based on last year's datelines). Quote
oblong Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, AlaskanTigersFan said: I guess I wasn't really clear. I think with MLB players now making $60 mil/year and Hockey players maxing out at $10 mil per year, how do we get MLB to be reasonable? $25-35 mil is a lot of money and should be superstar per year money, but not $60. But how do we go back from this? This is the argument that will ruin baseball. Before these deals, I think there was a legit chance to have a collective bargaining agreement next year. Now, I don't see how it's possible..... How will the owners get a salary cap when some players are making $60 million a year? It's not really possible unless your cap is like $500+ million per year which is totally unrealistic.... I could see a cap being $300 or lower. But you got 28 players and one person making $60 million, that's 20% of your payroll. I guess if you can fit 25 other players under the $240 it'd be possible..... And then it turns into how much do minor leaguers play into the cap? It's turned into a real mess and rather quickly..... Why is that my problem to solve? If the players don’t get it then the owners just pocket it. Costs will not go down if salaries went down. The NHL doesn’t bring in the revenue that MLB does. That’s why tbeir players make less. Quote
Edman85 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Also, the $60M a year numbers are a bit inflated. The deferrals in some of these deals really drop the NPV of them significantly. The league has Tucker (4/240) at something like $57M factoring in deferrals. Ohtani's is on the order of $47M despite the (10/700) price tag. I do anticipate Skubal getting nominally 50+ AAV. Deferrals would depend on jock taxes in the locale he signs. It does seem like teams are using signing bonus to get around player income taxes as well. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 24 minutes ago, oblong said: Why is that my problem to solve? If the players don’t get it then the owners just pocket it. Costs will not go down if salaries went down. The NHL doesn’t bring in the revenue that MLB does. That’s why tbeir players make less. to pick up on the NHL/MLB comparison, Google tells me that the Wings generate ~$250M in revenue and the NHL salary cap is $95.5M, leaving the Wings ~$150M to cover non-salary expenses and pocket the rest. OTOH, the Tigers are estimated to have $325M in revenue and the luxury tax limit in $224M leaving ~$100M for expenses and profit, which are probably much higher for a baseball team than a hockey team. But of course the Tigers are not near the lux tax limit, payroll last season was closer to $150M, which means they had roughly $170M left after payroll. So if any/all of these numbers are anything near reality (and who really knows), I have a feeling it may not be a coincidence if the Tigers and Red Wings are operating with a relatively similar revenue-payroll number. Edited 13 hours ago by gehringer_2 Quote
oblong Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago That has me wondering what the operating cost of a typical red wing game vs Tiger game? I was once told by someone who worked in “event” at Comerica that having the stadium lights on for a vent in the Tiger club was a few thousand. That’s simply the DTE initial charge to turn them on. Like the cost of ice and maintenance vs the turf and crew at Comerica. ChatGPT estimates $150-300K for NHL and $300K for MLB. Quote
oblong Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago But there’s obviously more organizational costs beyond stadium operations. do those revenue figures cover advertising in the stadium. Signage. Etc? Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 3 minutes ago, oblong said: That has me wondering what the operating cost of a typical red wing game vs Tiger game? I was once told by someone who worked in “event” at Comerica that having the stadium lights on for a vent in the Tiger club was a few thousand. That’s simply the DTE initial charge to turn them on. Like the cost of ice and maintenance vs the turf and crew at Comerica. A baseball stadium is physically larger - more of it is outside where sun and weather take a their toll, it takes a bigger staff to operate, and most significantly, does not bring in anything like the outside rental income LCA does (this may be the most significant difference), A baseball team also has a bigger minor league operation, much more travel expense. So the amount of revenue left after all that is probably a lot more attractive for the Wings, which is likely what the difference it the estimated value of the two franchises reflects. Quote
Tenacious D Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Edman85 said: Also, the $60M a year numbers are a bit inflated. The deferrals in some of these deals really drop the NPV of them significantly. The league has Tucker (4/240) at something like $57M factoring in deferrals. Ohtani's is on the order of $47M despite the (10/700) price tag. I do anticipate Skubal getting nominally 50+ AAV. Deferrals would depend on jock taxes in the locale he signs. It does seem like teams are using signing bonus to get around player income taxes as well. I applaud your effort to steer the conversation back to Tigers baseball talk. I thought I had stumbled into the Wings forum. Quote
Edman85 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago (edited) World Series (9-15M typically) vs. Stanley Cup TV ratings (2-5M) aren't even close. Stanley Cup and WNBA Finals (1-2M) are somewhat close, especially with women's ratings increasing significantly this decade.... Edited 12 hours ago by Edman85 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tenacious D said: I applaud your effort to steer the conversation back to Tigers baseball talk. I thought I had stumbled into the Wings forum. with the same guy is running both shows, the way one side is run can always inform what you can expect on the other side. Quote
Tenacious D Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 33 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: with the same guy is running both shows, the way one side is run can always inform what you can expect on the other side. Which Def Leppard lyrics are these? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.