Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, chasfh said:

That’s the thing about baseball in general, and this game in particular: I just feel so relentlessly, endlessly marketed to. I don’t feel I’m treated like a fan so much as I’m part of a target audience.

As you know, most of us here are not the target audience.  I never feel like the target audience.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

As you know, most of us here are not the target audience.  I never feel like the target audience.  

Yup. I haven't felt like part of the target audience since my most preferred vendor was Mattel.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
5 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Oh, **** me, here we go … 

 

 

 

Yes, it's coming.  The relentless promotion of gambling and extra inning base runnrers have definitely eroded my love for the game.  It will take another big hit with swing offs.  

Posted
46 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Yes, it's coming.  The relentless promotion of gambling and extra inning base runnrers have definitely eroded my love for the game.  It will take another big hit with swing offs.  

Its frustrating.   I used to love college football.  Now I hardly care, it's gotten so out of hand.   Michigan won a championship and I watched parts of 4 or 5 games and that was it.     I wasn't against players getting paid, but not in the millions.   And these conferences.  The Big 10 means nothing to me now.   USC?  Oregon?   Come on.......

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said:

Its frustrating.   I used to love college football.  Now I hardly care, it's gotten so out of hand.   Michigan won a championship and I watched parts of 4 or 5 games and that was it.     I wasn't against players getting paid, but not in the millions.   And these conferences.  The Big 10 means nothing to me now.   USC?  Oregon?   Come on.......

It lost it for me when I went to a couple of UM games in recent years and the game was like a sideshow to all the unrelated media they were blasting at you for 4 hours - I used to like going to a football game to watch a football game, but at the game it has become almost an afterthought, any drama or momentum you might expect is a sporting event is deftly drained away but the commercial time-out official who is ultimate arbiter when anything can happen regardless of the game flow. It's been pretty much downhill from there.

The truth is that big money ruins the value of most thing for most people. When you are under constant pressure to separate yourself from every dollar you possess, it's hard to have a good time and that's what big time sports has become across the board. But the operators have no choice, the system they've created is one where they don't survive if they don't keep taking every opportunity they can invent to separate an additional dime from a fan. </rant>

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Motor City Sonics said:

Its frustrating.   I used to love college football.  Now I hardly care, it's gotten so out of hand.   Michigan won a championship and I watched parts of 4 or 5 games and that was it.     I wasn't against players getting paid, but not in the millions.   And these conferences.  The Big 10 means nothing to me now.   USC?  Oregon?   Come on.......

I have always been a peripheral fan of college football, so it doesn't bother me so much, but the conferences are ridiculous.  I understand that it's all about money, but it's absurd to have conferences so big that a school doesn't play half the teams in the conference in a given year.  I also hate college football overtime.  Just like baseball, it bothers me to see one set of rules for regulation and a different set of rules for overtime.  

Posted

Ok, the swing off thing is only ok for something like an all star game. It should never be used in a regular season game. Just end in a tie instead, please. If they are worried about teams playing for a tie then they should be worried about teams playing for a swing off too.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I have always been a peripheral fan of college football, so it doesn't bother me so much, but the conferences are ridiculous.  I understand that it's all about money, but it's absurd to have conferences so big that a school doesn't play half the teams in the conference in a given year.  I also hate college football overtime.  Just like baseball, it bothers me to see one set of rules for regulation and a different set of rules for overtime.  

the injury rate in football is so high I can understand wanting to add as few plays from scrimmage to end the game as possible. What I guess I don't understand is how the sport survived 100 yrs perfectly well with ties. Maybe it goes back to the gamblers, but I thought in the old days the bookmakers made out well in ties. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

the injury rate in football is so high I can understand wanting to add as few plays from scrimmage to end the game as possible. What I guess I don't understand is how the sport survived 100 yrs perfectly well with ties. Maybe it goes back to the gamblers, but I thought in the old days the bookmakers made out well in ties. 

If injury rate is the reason, they could go back to having ties.  

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

If injury rate is the reason, they could go back to having ties.  

They do make for even more complex standings and playoff tie-breaker possibilities, which I would generally assume only deepens fan interest.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

I would rather have a swing off than a tie.  But I'm not a fan of the swing offs in a regular season game.  It's different than a shoot out in hockey.  In hockey you win by scoring goals.  You score goals by putting the puck in the net.  That's the only way you score a goal.  Yes I know there's more to in in terms of setting up and deflections and blocking the goalie, etc.  But the shootout is still a contest between a player and a goalie.   The hockey equivalent would be to set up plates in the goal and have guys shoot at them from the blue line like they do in teh ASG Skills contest.

n baseball there's many ways to score a run.  It can be by power like a HR. It could be due to speed via a baserunner.  Instead of a HR why not time guys running from 2B to home and the best time wins?

Like my thoughts on the ghost runner... if they insist on doing this and I have no say in the matter, then do it after 12 or 13 innings.  Not the 10th.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...