Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, oblong said:

Chicago sucks 

 

At the game last night with friends and we noticed that the sponsorship logo was face down during last night’s game, too. The prevailing conjecture was, someone’s check bounced.

Posted
2 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

I thought we had three HBP‘s but I’m multitasking

They took away the one on Tork.  Made him go back into the box, ended up drawing a walk after all. 

Posted
1 minute ago, lordstanley said:

They took away the one on Tork.  Made him go back into the box, ended up drawing a walk after all. 

I’m still boiling over with resentment because it feels better. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, lordstanley said:

They took away the one on Tork.  Made him go back into the box, ended up drawing a walk after all. 

I hope the announcer was happy he went down to 1st during the challenge.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

I hope the announcer was happy he went down to 1st during the challenge.

Could the Tigers have challenged the non-call on Inge in Game 163 if review existed in 2009?

Posted
3 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

living a little dangerously.

 

2 minutes ago, IdahoBert said:

This is “the game of living dangerously.“

We are simultaneously living on the same wavelength. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      310
    • Most Online
      704

    Newest Member
    Grubby
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...