Motown Bombers Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Donald Trump literally lost as the incumbent and came back and won. Kamala Harris is more than capable of winning. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: Donald Trump literally lost as the incumbent and came back and won. Kamala Harris is more than capable of winning. Ain't no damn way a black woman is winning the presidency. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, GalagaGuy said: Ain't no damn way a black woman is winning the presidency. She got the second most votes ever for a Dem. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: She got the second most votes ever for a Dem. She got 5 million more votes that Obama did his first time. Are you suggesting that makes her more popular? 1 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: She got the second most votes ever for a Dem. That's a pretty silly stat considering that she lost. The recent high vote totals don't indicate popularity. A lot of people have voted in the last two elections because of mail-in voting. Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: That's a pretty silly stat considering that she lost. The recent high vote totals don't indicate popularity. A lot of people have voted in the last two elections because of mail-in voting. Combined with the fact there were 30 million more eligible voters in 2024 than 2008 1 Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago She got more votes than Trump got in 2020. Dems had a candidate that defeated Trump and got the most votes ever but decided to throw him under the bus and expect Harris to win an election in 107 days. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Not for anything related but I have a feeling that at least part of the reason Spanberger won big in Virginia last fall was because the Republican candidate was a woman of color. Not to mention a horrible candidate. A white male would have at least made the race interesting Quote
CMRivdogs Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Swalwell's toast. But the guy who rapedv women and children is still adored by his fanatics Quote
Edman85 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 51 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: That's a pretty silly stat considering that she lost. The recent high vote totals don't indicate popularity. A lot of people have voted in the last two elections because of mail-in voting. And also population growth. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 30 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: Swalwell's toast. But the guy who rapedv women and children is still adored by his fanatics So galling that this kind of thing kills one party when it happen to them, but strengthens the other party when it happens to them. 2 Quote
GalagaGuy Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago So at least one of the Swalwell accusers has ties to Katie Porter. Surely that's just a coincidence I guess. Quote
chasfh Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I would still vote for Swalwell—or Katie Porter, or Gavin Newsome, for that matter—than any candidate the republicans would put up there. BTW, what’s the problem with Katie Porter? Do we hate her now, too? I haven’t heard a thing about anything with her. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Katie Porter is NIMBY. That’s the last thing California needs. It was also reported that she doesn’t treat her staff well. She has shown a temper. She was asked a question when running for senate that every candidate was asked and she got mad and walked off. She’s also a leftist that never accomplished anything but has a whiteboard. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, GalagaGuy said: So at least one of the Swalwell accusers has ties to Katie Porter. Surely that's just a coincidence I guess. Given that lying is the political tool de jure now-a-days, I try not jump to conclusions about any of this stuff. I believe two things are both true: 1) men have gotten away with this stuff in the main for a long time, 2) there is no XX chromosome linked truth gene either. 1 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: Given that lying is the political tool de jure now-a-days, I try not jump to conclusions about any of this stuff. I believe two things are both true: 1) men have gotten away with this stuff in the main for a long time, 2) there is no XX chromosome linked truth gene either. When has lying not been the political tool of the day? I strongly agree that men get away with lying much more easily. When they do it, it is considered crafty and slick. When a woman does it, she is a bad person. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.