Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Jason_R said:

Yes, Brad should have known McNeil would tear his ACL. It is our job as fans to call him out on his failures to predict the future. 

This is exactly what Im saying.  The move hasn’t turned out right but you are giving him a free pass because it was the right move at the time.   Thats not how it should work.  This is a results business.  We need to spend more time judging the result than the planning that went into it.  Sure, that’s probably not “fair” to Brad but this is a really hard job.   He isn’t expected to get them all right but fans have gotten themselves into this mindset that it’s ok to miss as long as it the rationale at the time made sense. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

This is exactly what Im saying.  The move hasn’t turned out right but you are giving him a free pass because it was the right move at the time.   Thats not how it should work.  This is a results business.  We need to spend more time judging the result than the planning that went into it.  Sure, that’s probably not “fair” to Brad but this is a really hard job.   He isn’t expected to get them all right but fans have gotten themselves into this mindset that it’s ok to miss as long as it the rationale at the time made sense. 

Put down the hong. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hongbit said:

GM’s get paid a lot of money to get it right in the end.  Getting the right result at the end is what matters regardless of how it looked at the time the move was made.   We spend too much time judging guys on moves that seemed right at the time versus what the result turned out to be.   This **** isn’t easy.  They are going to make mistakes along the way.  It’s not an insult to call them out when they do.  

The only reason it looks questionable in hindsight is because of the injury, that doesn't mean it was a mistake to extend him because how could they possibly know that he'd get injured. Based on his performance, it was a no brainer to extend him.

Posted
Just now, NYLion said:

The only reason it looks questionable in hindsight is because of the injury, that doesn't mean it was a mistake to extend him because how could they possibly know that he'd get injured. Based on his performance, it was a no brainer to extend him.

So if a move made perfect sense at the time but turns out to be wrong, the move was still a good one?    I don’t get that. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...