Jump to content

buddha

Members
  • Posts

    15,035
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

Everything posted by buddha

  1. why would they want bad contracts in a deal to unload their best player? he's a solid 1b center (like larkin) on a reasonable deal through his 30s. youre paying for ultimate decline but not too much. probably a first round pick (or two), a top prospect like asp, and a second tier prospect like buium or lombardi.
  2. how is nico not executive of the year for the job he's done for the lakers?
  3. i had him 3rd, i think that's pretty good. i dont get the "hey, your team was supposed to be good so having one of the greatest regular seasons in nba history isnt good enough." since there is no criteria for "coach of the year" we can just argue in circles about this for days.
  4. i think jb has done a good job. i also think this season's advance is more of a sign of JUST HOW BAD MONTY WILLIAMS WAS AS COACH. it was the worst coaching job ive ever seen. and it isnt "the same roster". no wiseman is huge. a cancer and a terrible player. adding beasley was massive considering the season he's had. ausar and duren's improvement. a healthy cade. adding a sparkplug in holland. those are improvements. losing ivey matters a lot, but natural improvement from younger players also contributed.
  5. i would not sign jaymo to a big deal. no way. he's certainly not a bust. he's a quality player. but the lions have LOTS of quality players and they cant keep them all.
  6. i've always thought next year was the year to make a big move to strengthen the team, and then use your prospect group as cheap labor as you pay big money for a marner or ehlers or another top offensive player. but the fact that they are stuck with holl, tarasenko and gustaffson for another year tells me other wise. as you said, getting rid of ghost and walman because you didnt have money for seider/raymond extensions BECAUSE you signed the likes of holl and then tarasenko and gustaffson was the first time i really thought....do they have a plan? and i still get why they dealt walman and i still think he's a problem and weak on a good team...but you attached a pick when you could have used waivers and then you signed gustaffson and tarasenko... up until this year he made a lot of nice moves: walman trade, ghost signing, mantha trade (sort of), bertuzzi deal, debrincat trade, perron signing, kane signing, and i understood copp (and i actually think he's been as advertised as a good defensive player and leader and its no coincidence they declined after his injury) and chairot (big physical defenseman who is overmatched on top pair but is an ok second pair and a really good third pair). compher? 5 years? holl? three years? a washed up gustaffson and tarasenko? this last offseason was so brutal it killed any momentum they had. to finish this rambling post, they need more hits from the prospects and they need them now. if not, theyre buffalo.
  7. if that's true they need to trade him now while he still has some value.
  8. i read something the other day about how their european picks have mostly worked out but their north american picks have not. they rely on their super swedish scout andersson but their north american team gives them next to nothing. and their guys develop in sweden when coached by other team's management but in the US they stagnate. not universally true, but something to think about. as to zach benson, no thanks. we'll see but he hasnt been particularly impressive in buffalo. i want to see danielson in detroit first. of course with stevie holland in charge, that may not be until 2030.
  9. if it doesnt work out, we'll look back and cite a couple of turning points. he really refused to "bottom out completely" by not trading larkin. and instead of making signings of guys he could move for picks, he signed copp, compher, and chairot in an attempt to bring in veterans to make the team better. he didnt want "to be buffalo", a team with a terrible culture but always a nice prospect list. instead they achieved what you always warned against: the mushy middle. not bad enough to get a star and not good enough to make the playoffs. larkin and raymond are good players. but for the wings to win they need to be great players. and theyre not. but when people will look back, it will be copp, compher, and chairot. why sign those guys? to get the 8th seed? whoo hoo.
  10. they'll give it to draymond, or whomever led the league in blocks.
  11. i think we place too much consideration on it, not that it deserves no consideration. as i said before, pistons fans think about the pistons and not the rest of the league. jb did a nice job, but for me, others should be rewarded for the better jobs they did. blink.
  12. and they still won 68 games and should rightly be considered one of the best regular season teams in nba history. the coach of that team should be the coach of the year. imo we place too much consideration on "we thought they would be bad but instead theyre ok, what a coaching job." reward excellence.
  13. hey, were a helpful people! 😉
  14. waive him and eat the money. he's finished.
  15. you think they really soak tourists? try living here! 😀 the 18.5% tax on hotels doesnt help. nor does one of the nation's highest sales tax.
  16. hawks win in a shootout.
  17. there are some low income subsidized apartments right over there. right next to million dollar homes and half million condos. welcome to the city.
  18. most places in the nicer parts of town are ridiculously expensive right now. lots of townhouses and single family homes over there. i used to live a few blocks from there in a cheap tiny condo. walking distance from really nice areas. half acre brewery restaurant is right there. right between lincoln square and andersonville.
  19. "Winning 50 in a tougher conference is impressive." how about winning 68 with the best scoring differential ever?
  20. and tarasenko scores the eng that clinches it. even when he scores he hurts the team.
  21. not bad if you avoid the low income housing. why?
  22. and montreal scores. high fives all around for the refs.
  23. i dont think i can ever forgive jt compher for missing a wide open empty net from 10 feet in the most important game of the year. he's fallen roght below gustaffson and tarasenko on my most disloked red wings list.
  24. hawks up 3-2 late in the 3rd montreal and get called for a bs penalty. refs know the assignment.
  25. idiots. jesus effing christ. LOSE YOU MORONS! WHO ARE YOU, THE PISTONS?
×
×
  • Create New...