Tiger337

Good question. Why do so many teams do that? I think it's more owners wanting to save money on salaries during lean years than anything else. I means it's good to get high draft picks because a moderate percentage do end up making good contributions, so if you collect enough of them, you'll get some hits. However, I have never been a proponent of deliberate total re-builds.

Chatgtp did not used to to have links which is why I stopped using it. It's good to hear that it now does. edit: I just compared chatgtp to perplexity on a couple of searches. Perplexity gave sources and chatgtp did not. So, maybe chatgtp sometimes gives sources but not consistently.

I will be happy (and I expect him to be Tiger), but I'd like it even better if more talent was added to support him.

Correlation does not prove causation and saying phrases like "I have no words" is not not a persuasive argument either. I see Hinch and Fetter having an impact at the major league level. I don't see Harris having as much of an impact at that level, at least not yet. The Tigers would not be doing what they have done the last two years without the players, manager and pitching coach which Avila provided. Avila was terrible, but when you collect prospects for long enough (way too long in his case) you can build up a good base of talent.

I like Perplexity, because it provides sources.

Adduci has already recruited him.

Avila never should have traded Cody Ross

Lynn Henning finally called something correctly.

I have seen clear evidence of Hinch's influence. And yeah, Avila hired him.

I have seen no credible evidence that there even any ink.

I really don't see much evidence that the team performance of the last two years is all because of Harris. I expect to see more evidence at the MLB level of Harrises influence soon, but I have not seen it yet.

I understand that, on average, players have a better chance to succeed under the new system, but you still can't quantify how individual players would have performed under one system versus the other.

So, you are sure that Greene would be a bum if Harris were not the GM?

Sure, but how can we know how Skubal, Carpenter and Greene would have developed if Avila was still the GM? And maybe the current administration didn't develop Torkelson and Mize very well. I don't think that's true, but there is a lot of speculation in determining how much was talent and how much was development.

You could do the same thing with almost any teams draft picks if you want to make them look bad. As for Greene, I think you are vastly overestimating the value of draft picks. The median value of a 5th pick in the draft is zero career WAR. He is already at 10. Carpenter and Skubal were great picks, no matter how hard you try to rationalize that they weren't. Also, you forgot Dillon Dingler.

SI has got some good writers, but it's something you read in the waiting room when you go to the doctor. It has no credibility if you are looking for reliable day to day news.

It was all about the party.

2 years $19 million according to Petzold.

The devil we know! I am happy that Torres, Flaherty and Finnegan are coming back. They basically have the same team coming back plus hopefully McGonigle is ready. I'd still like to see more.

All-in suggests that they would be trading all their prospects and going for it just for one year. I would not want that. My hope is that they sign a solid MLB player or two to give them a better chance this year and hopefully they can help next year too when Skubal is gone. If the concern is players getting blocked, then they could certainly sign a pitcher without worrying about that.

Milwaukee Brewers maybe. I actually like how they are a small market team and has managed to stay afloat without a lot of terrible seasons.

Of course, nobody knows what he will do. However, I think everything Harris has done in his career may be a pretty good indicator of what we can expect in the future and it may be why Ilitch signed him. Don't get me wrong. Being a somewhat wealthier version of the Rays is not necessarily a bad thing.

So, it seems like the Tigers may be following the Tampa Rays model as some of us suspected all along. It has worked out reasonably well for Tampa but that kind of constant roster turnover is not appealing to me. I guess it will be somewhat like following a college team which has constant turnover through player graduation.

He is not really comfortable in most interviews. He doesn't like to talk about specific plans or give anything away and he shouldn't. He isn't good at telling jokes to turn the question or anything like that. However, I think that has little to do with being an effective GM.

I think traditional fans are skeptical of him because they want the Tigers to make big moves to improve the team and he hasn't made any (big moves) since he has been here. I think it has little to do with being a stat nerd or a college boy or whatever.