Tiger337

That would probably give you between 2 and 3 WAR which would be fine.

We need rage.

Oh, I know that. I have long worried about a huge financial hack that wipes out our retirement accounts.

I have never understood how people who slobber all over Trump can honestly complain abut elitism.

They don't even have to be adversaries. Nigeria has some of the biggest scammers in the world and they are not an adversary of the United States.

I'd like to see a Meadows/Baez platoon in center with McGonigle at shortstop. They can maybe move Baez to the infield when Valdez is pitching.

Perez and Vierling can play CF, but you don't want them playing there regularly. I think Hinch will be playing his usual musical chairs

I don't follow him, but he apparently doesn't like people who work in cubicles. It sounds like jealousy.

When was the last time they attacked us on our soil? Thanks for making it more likely to happen. That's the way it is I guess.

I am not optimistic that either will hit. Baez went two straight years where he was garbage. One year he was injured, the other year I assume not. They can both be useful with their gloves, but their at bats should be limited. It's not ideal for both to be in the line-up at the same time.

Over the past three years, Meadows has a .694 OPS. Baez .606. Chances are neither will hit, but I'll take my chances with Meadows over Baez. A platoon makes sense though. I expect McGonigle to be the starting shortstop.

B**** is not a nice term and it is used inappropriately way to often. It fits her perfectly though.

If that's true, then it's like letting your pitcher throw 140 pitches in a blowout. It's a poor use of resources.

It's more than 3.20 where I live.

Like third base for most of Tigers history?

Is that what he meant? My guess is he was talking about drafting hitters by quality and pitchers by quantity

Join the plurality party - independents. I have been an Independent forever. I am a liberal independent, but I don't like identifying with a party.

Either they both make the team or neither makes the team. They go together.

I think it's lot less than 50/50, but who knows?

I wrote a paper my Sophomore year in college supporting Reagan. I really wasn't interested in politics, but I had to pick a side to write the paper. My left-wing radical professor liked the paper and gave me an A. He was a good teacher and it was an interesting class. Taking liberal arts classes was also a good way to boost my GPA. I voted for Anderson (not Sparky!) in 1980. I probably voted for Reagan in 1984. I don't remember. I later became marginally interested in libertarianism. There was no magic moment which made me switch from left to right. Life experiences and observations made me more empathetic and compassionate and I gradually shifted left.

This sounds fake. I could see one commander saying something like that, but I doubt it is systemic.

I think that ship has sailed already. Every place you go on the internet is invading you privacy, stealing your identity, whatever. There's no way to get away from it. I don't pay for a lot of subscriptions, but I pay for what makes my life easier.

Marco Rubio has always been weak. He used to ne somewhat normal. Now, every time I see him it's like he's a hostage held captive by Trump. I think he has destroyed his political career much like Pence.

I am not even sure what the media is anymore. A subscription is required for almost everything thing now and what they were giving us before isn't worth ****, so I haven't signed up for anything. I look for stuff on bluesky and twitter and try piece together what's happening.

I have been paying $20 per month for ChatGPT and it is a LOT better than the free version. However, I am hearing that Claude is better for the kind of stuff I do. I am going to try it out. If the $20 version is good, then I can dump chatgpt.