Sf and LA are also really high income! LA still has poor areas, prolly more so than SF, but how does the ratio of rich to poor tracts compare to a place like Det? Same arg would apply to NYC, which has poor rough areas, but so much more upscale population that overall crime rates taken over the whole city are never as bad as in a Det where most of city population is poor.
so what I’d be curious about is when you break down an area like Little Rock, are rates higher than in LA in areas of equal income, or does it just come back down to a high proportion of low income areas with rates just like similar income areas elsewhere?