The situation is what it is, but I guess I don't understand the fixation on fluffing Fulmer after an outing where he threw more balls than strikes and one where he's lucky that Buxton didn't send one of his pitches to the third deck.
Honestly, I'd prefer they went with him over Soto in the closers role or at least go back to a more closer by committee situation, but given how both looked last night, I wouldn't have had much more confidence in Fulmer in the 9th than Soto. And even if you do make him closer, aren't you still stuck hoping Soto pitches better in the set up role?
At the end of the day, the roles are only a part of the problem... the reality is that both of these guys, for better or worse, are leverage guys. Maybe one is better than the other overall, but neither had it last night. And when neither guy has it, it makes it harder to nail down the win.