Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Motown Bombers said:

 

I guess we shoulda seen this coming. It goes to the Virgina State Supreme Court first. If Trump doesnt like their decision, can he take it to the SCOTUS? Or do they stay out of state elections?

Posted

So, the story about the Navy Secretary being fired was Kegsbreath didn't like that he had his own relationship with Trump and pitched the new "Trump Battleship" to Trump without having consulted with Kegsbreath. 

The new Navy Secretary is a wacko who was trying to be the congressman for my district last year. 

Posted

With this admin there's two reasons people get fired and neither is good:

1) They're so bat**** crazy or the crimes so severe that even this group says "get them out of here"

2) THey refused to go along with some bat**** crazy idea

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

I've never seen an administration where there were so many sex scandals. 

 

Hate to quibble with Ron on this one, but Trump never said he was going to hire the “most qualified” people. He said he was going to hire “only the best” people. I think we now fully understand what he meant by that.

Posted
8 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

I guess we shoulda seen this coming. It goes to the Virgina State Supreme Court first. If Trump doesnt like their decision, can he take it to the SCOTUS? Or do they stay out of state elections?

States do have to conduct elections in accordance with the Constitution, so in that sense SCOTUS does have some jurisdiction over interpreting what that means. If the State Supreme Court overturns the election without a strong enough constitutional basis, SCOTUS can overturn their decision. That’s how it’s supposed to work, anyway.

Posted
1 minute ago, chasfh said:

States do have to conduct elections in accordance with the Constitution, so in that sense SCOTUS does have some jurisdiction over interpreting what that means. If the State Supreme Court overturns the election without a strong enough constitutional basis, SCOTUS can overturn their decision. That’s how it’s supposed to work, anyway.

I don't want SCOTUS anywhere near this issue. I read the Virginia Supreme Court is conservative but one report i read said that it's a small c in conservative. Moderate conservatives? Is there even such a thing? 😆😆

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

I don't want SCOTUS anywhere near this issue. I read the Virginia Supreme Court is conservative but one report i read said that it's a small c in conservative. Moderate conservatives? Is there even such a thing? 😆😆

Oh, right, I wouldn’t want this particular Court to weigh in on it, either. I’m talking about SCOTUS’s role in this on a theoretical basis.

Posted
1 minute ago, chasfh said:

Oh, right, I wouldn’t want this particular Court to weigh in on it, either. I’m talking about SCOTUS’s role in this on a theoretical basis.

But what i wonder is SCOTUS would even take it up? If they ruled Texas is allowed to rework their maps, wouldn't that set precedent? I just don't really understand if the vote by citizens of Virginia is going to be taken away. It seems unconstitutional.

Posted

He's doing great.  Remember when HW Bush posted during the 1992 election about how he was ambassador to the UN in 1970?  

Or, when Eisenhower bragged in 1957 about being on MacArthur's staff in the Philippines in 1935? 

Or, when Reagan bragged in 1981 about his time as SAG president in the late 1950s?  

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...