tiger2022 Posted Tuesday at 08:48 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:48 PM I think Hinch would have tried but then the front office would have asked him what the bleep he was doing and if he wanted to keep his job. Quote
SoCalTiger Posted Tuesday at 09:03 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:03 PM 4 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: could be. McK was a little rough at SS when he first arrived but seemed to play pretty well there last season, so that would make sense. Except he's at shortstop today so what do I know 🥸 Quote
SoCalTiger Posted Tuesday at 09:06 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:06 PM 3 hours ago, Shelton said: McGonigle has played the entire game for at the last 18 games and basically every game this season. In these last 18 in a row, he has played 3B in 9 of them (4 full games and 5 games playing both SS and 3B). No one is saying Harris and Hinch are stupid people. But there are alternatives to being forced into using Zack Short. It’s not like they have no choice. They are choosing to use him, so it’s fair game to discuss that choice. Every game that has featured Zack short could have featured someone else in his lineup spot, with Kevin playing SS instead. I know nobody was saying H & H are dumb and I agree the Short usage does seem rather high. maybe he has to be on the roster as the only back up but he doesn't need to play so much as you said. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Tuesday at 10:45 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:45 PM 1 hour ago, SoCalTiger said: Except he's at shortstop today so what do I know 🥸 fast healer. 1 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Tuesday at 10:53 PM Posted Tuesday at 10:53 PM 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: Right now, Keith needs to figure how to hit right handers. He has hit for a .528 OPS over the past month. Keith and Torkelson both seem to be guys who spend time playing below their talent because their brains are in the way. For Colt, we can probably assume the HR drought is at a point it's messing seriously with his head. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 01:35 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:35 PM 19 hours ago, Shelton said: McGonigle has played the entire game for at the last 18 games and basically every game this season. In these last 18 in a row, he has played 3B in 9 of them (4 full games and 5 games playing both SS and 3B). No one is saying Harris and Hinch are stupid people. But there are alternatives to being forced into using Zack Short. It’s not like they have no choice. They are choosing to use him, so it’s fair game to discuss that choice. Every game that has featured Zack short could have featured someone else in his lineup spot, with Kevin playing SS instead. Well, I wouldn't say no one is saying Harris and Hinch are stupid people ... 😏 But seriously, I can hardly imagine what kind of doghouse Jace Jung must be in that he's not considered a better alternative to Gage Workman or Zack Short. Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 01:47 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:47 PM 20 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: I'm sure there is a way to confirm or not, but I assume that they are the team with the most or almost the most guys on the IL in the majors. and it seems to be both pitchers and position players. further assuming that in terms of starters they are near the top of the list. also assuming they are near the top with the most Minor league guys on the IL. not sure how you compete with 4 ML bats to call on each night. We can confirm the injury info at The Baseball Cube. I took both the majors and minors list, up there as of today, and determined projected WAR for each player on both lists who has a ZIPS WAR projection, added them all up by team, and lo and behold: Team MLB Players MLB IL WAR Minors Players Minors IL WAR Total Players Total IL WAR Detroit Tigers 14 19.7 36 6.2 50 25.9 New York Mets 12 23.5 38 1.5 50 25.0 Boston Red Sox 9 17.8 26 1.9 35 19.6 Houston Astros 12 18.0 29 1.4 41 19.4 Baltimore Orioles 11 13.1 42 4.7 53 17.9 Toronto Blue Jays 13 17.9 43 -0.1 56 17.7 Atlanta Braves 9 12.5 13 1.6 22 14.2 Chicago White Sox 11 11.2 33 2.8 44 14.0 San Francisco Giants 8 11.7 22 2.2 30 13.9 Texas Rangers 9 15.2 28 -1.4 37 13.9 Chicago Cubs 11 12.1 34 1.0 45 13.2 Seattle Mariners 6 12.2 15 0.9 21 13.1 Los Angeles Dodgers 13 12.7 44 -0.2 57 12.4 Arizona Diamondbacks 12 10.6 25 1.2 37 11.8 Minnesota Twins 6 6.2 32 5.6 38 11.8 San Diego Padres 8 10.2 28 0.8 36 11.0 Athletics 6 7.0 13 3.8 19 10.8 Kansas City Royals 8 10.1 23 0.3 31 10.4 Tampa Bay Rays 11 9.3 34 0.9 45 10.2 Colorado Rockies 13 9.3 29 0.5 42 9.8 Milwaukee Brewers 7 8.8 24 0.8 31 9.6 Cincinnati Reds 6 8.7 29 0.7 35 9.4 New York Yankees 5 7.3 35 1.7 40 9.0 Miami Marlins 5 6.0 38 2.9 43 9.0 Los Angeles Angels 7 5.1 22 0.6 29 5.7 Washington Nationals 7 2.8 34 1.9 41 4.8 St. Louis Cardinals 5 4.3 22 -1.2 27 3.1 Pittsburgh Pirates 3 2.7 27 0.3 30 3.0 Philadelphia Phillies 3 0.0 35 1.6 38 1.6 Cleveland Guardians 2 1.8 28 -0.4 30 1.4 The Tigers are second highest in just majors players, and highest in just minors players. Only the Mets have a credible claim to having worse injury luck up and down their system than we. 3 Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 01:52 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:52 PM 19 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: i like defense as much as the next guy, but the league average plays for a SS in 9 innings is 4.5 and probably 90% of those are routine. That’s works out to about a play every two games where a better defender is likely to matter. OTOH, in those two games that player had 7-9 PA, every one of which mattered. That’s an extreme view, but the numbers are what they are. Any one of those marginal one-out-of-two-games misses would cost us an out at minimum, and could reasonably be feared to result in multiple runs that would never have happened otherwise which could cost us a win. Add enough of those across a season and we are talking about costing us wins, with an "s". Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Wednesday at 01:57 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:57 PM (edited) 7 minutes ago, chasfh said: Any one of those marginal one-out-of-two-games misses would cost us an out at minimum, and could reasonably be feared to result in multiple runs that would never have happened otherwise which could cost us a win. Add enough of those across a season and we are talking about costing us wins, with an "s". bottom line for me with which is further below average for this team, runs allowed or runs scored? It's been runs scored, but after last night that's certainly trending the other way! 😱 and to defend or clarify - I was talking about the difference in defensive quality between a McGonigle and a Short, not the horrendous ineptitude of Wenceel Perez. I will grant you 16 ways to Sunday that you don't want W. Perez playing OF on your team. Edited Wednesday at 02:00 PM by gehringer_2 Quote
chasfh Posted Wednesday at 02:04 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:04 PM 6 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: bottom line for me with which is further below average for this team, runs allowed or runs scored? It's been runs scored, but after last night that's certainly trending the other way! 😱 and to defend or clarify - I was talking about the difference in defensive quality between a McGonigle and a Short, not the horrendous ineptitude of Wenceel Perez. I will grant you 16 ways to Sunday that you don't want W. Perez playing OF on your team. I didn't think Wenceel would get even this far! Quote
SoCalTiger Posted Wednesday at 04:20 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:20 PM Hinch " switch hitters are golden "....is why Mr. Perez is still here. The match up mentality can be an addiction to some and both Hinch and Harris have it since it shows how they can "play 3D chess " when other teams are playing checkers and. BTW, kicking our ***. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Wednesday at 07:29 PM Posted Wednesday at 07:29 PM 2 hours ago, SoCalTiger said: Hinch " switch hitters are golden "....is why Mr. Perez is still here. The match up mentality can be an addiction to some and both Hinch and Harris have it since it shows how they can "play 3D chess " when other teams are playing checkers and. BTW, kicking our ***. I think there is another aspect as well. The difference between good players and bad players is mostly consistency. Even a poor major leaguers can throw great pitches, make great plays and have great AB, they just can't bring that level often enough. So if you want to maximize the odds of success, having players who perform consistently means your projections of what do will be useful. If you have poor players, all outcomes become more random, as those players are less reliably projectable, and the ability to do game planning that makes a difference falls. Quote
SoCalTiger Posted yesterday at 03:51 AM Posted yesterday at 03:51 AM 8 hours ago, gehringer_2 said: I think there is another aspect as well. The difference between good players and bad players is mostly consistency. Even a poor major leaguers can throw great pitches, make great plays and have great AB, they just can't bring that level often enough. So if you want to maximize the odds of success, having players who perform consistently means your projections of what do will be useful. If you have poor players, all outcomes become more random, as those players are less reliably projectable, and the ability to do game planning that makes a difference falls. This makes sense. Talent often overcomes everything. Quote
AlaskanTigersFan Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago https://www.mlb.com/news/tarik-skubal-trade-rumors-interested-teams - Interesting article. https://www.si.com/mlb/brewers/onsi/should-brewers-push-their-chips-in-for-tarik-skubal-blockbuster-pat3?page_source=v_recirc - Talks Brewers trade idea from Brewers side: Brewers Receive: LHP Tarik Skubal Tigers Receive: INF Jett Williams (Brewers' No. 3 prospect, MLB's No. 60 prospect), OF Luis Lara (Brewers' No. 5 prospect, MLB's No. 94 prospect), and LHP Robert Gasser (Brewers' No. 15 prospect) I'd take that deal if it was the best. I think the Tigers could get a top 25 prospect in baseball and a ML SP right now though... I think the Dodgers got this on lock giving us one of their OF'rs and a SP. The Cubs are mentioned a lot as well. But I don't think they have enough. Jaxon Wiggins and who else would be enough from the Cubs? Hard to say really..... Their top prospect is basically Max Anderson.... It'd honestly take Ballesteros and Wiggins for me to be happy from the Cubs even if we have to kick back someone like Lee or Anderson or Briceno in the deal...... I doubt they'd do that. So I guess the Dodgers are the clear favorites ehh 🙂 Quote
AlaskanTigersFan Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago https://fansided.com/mlb/one-mlb-prospect-tigers-should-demand-in-return-from-every-tarik-skubal-frontrunner - Another fun article. If we can get Ethan Salas straight up for Skubal, I'd be a happy man... lol. Oi vey. Quote
papalawrence Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, AlaskanTigersFan said: https://www.mlb.com/news/tarik-skubal-trade-rumors-interested-teams - Interesting article. https://www.si.com/mlb/brewers/onsi/should-brewers-push-their-chips-in-for-tarik-skubal-blockbuster-pat3?page_source=v_recirc - Talks Brewers trade idea from Brewers side: Brewers Receive: LHP Tarik Skubal Tigers Receive: INF Jett Williams (Brewers' No. 3 prospect, MLB's No. 60 prospect), OF Luis Lara (Brewers' No. 5 prospect, MLB's No. 94 prospect), and LHP Robert Gasser (Brewers' No. 15 prospect) I'd take that deal if it was the best. I think the Tigers could get a top 25 prospect in baseball and a ML SP right now though... I think the Dodgers got this on lock giving us one of their OF'rs and a SP. The Cubs are mentioned a lot as well. But I don't think they have enough. Jaxon Wiggins and who else would be enough from the Cubs? Hard to say really..... Their top prospect is basically Max Anderson.... It'd honestly take Ballesteros and Wiggins for me to be happy from the Cubs even if we have to kick back someone like Lee or Anderson or Briceno in the deal...... I doubt they'd do that. So I guess the Dodgers are the clear favorites ehh 🙂 A healthy Skubal and Misioroski in the playoffs would be lethal. The Brewers have gone all in for pitching before. Could see them in the mix for sure if Skubal goes on the trade market Quote
chasfh Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 8 hours ago, AlaskanTigersFan said: https://www.mlb.com/news/tarik-skubal-trade-rumors-interested-teams - Interesting article. https://www.si.com/mlb/brewers/onsi/should-brewers-push-their-chips-in-for-tarik-skubal-blockbuster-pat3?page_source=v_recirc - Talks Brewers trade idea from Brewers side: Brewers Receive: LHP Tarik Skubal Tigers Receive: INF Jett Williams (Brewers' No. 3 prospect, MLB's No. 60 prospect), OF Luis Lara (Brewers' No. 5 prospect, MLB's No. 94 prospect), and LHP Robert Gasser (Brewers' No. 15 prospect) I'd take that deal if it was the best. I think the Tigers could get a top 25 prospect in baseball and a ML SP right now though... I think the Dodgers got this on lock giving us one of their OF'rs and a SP. The Cubs are mentioned a lot as well. But I don't think they have enough. Jaxon Wiggins and who else would be enough from the Cubs? Hard to say really..... Their top prospect is basically Max Anderson.... It'd honestly take Ballesteros and Wiggins for me to be happy from the Cubs even if we have to kick back someone like Lee or Anderson or Briceno in the deal...... I doubt they'd do that. So I guess the Dodgers are the clear favorites ehh 🙂 This would be out of character for the Brewers. Edited 4 hours ago by chasfh Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 12 minutes ago, chasfh said: This would be out of character for the Brewers. So would winning a world series Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago On 5/26/2026 at 2:38 PM, Dan Gilmore said: Continuing on the Short topic, yeah he sucks, but somehow has a better OPS than Perez. 😵💫 Because Perez is the worst player in MLB. Even worse than Short. Maybe Malgeri wouldn't be better, but isn't it worth taking a look - over Perez and Jones, at this point? What would they have to lose? You have enough of a sample size of Perez to know he's never going to be a good player. Why not start looking at other potential players for the future now? There's pretty much nothing to play for this season anymore. This season is over. Jones is a platoon DH. Are you kidding me? A platoon DH. Only really good teams get to have someone that narrow in ability. What a mess. Quote
SoCalTiger Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Motor City Sonics said: Because Perez is the worst player in MLB. Even worse than Short. Maybe Malgeri wouldn't be better, but isn't it worth taking a look - over Perez and Jones, at this point? What would they have to lose? You have enough of a sample size of Perez to know he's never going to be a good player. Why not start looking at other potential players for the future now? There's pretty much nothing to play for this season anymore. This season is over. Jones is a platoon DH. Are you kidding me? A platoon DH. Only really good teams get to have someone that narrow in ability. What a mess. short side platoon at that. Basically a pinch hitter for "a" key spot in the game. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.