lordstanley Posted Friday at 07:24 PM Posted Friday at 07:24 PM 18 minutes ago, oblong said: That is/was a thing for MLB players. I remember an article in SI back when they were legitimate. You spend 10-20 years married but never see each other for half the year. Then you retire and find out "We don't really like each other...." or at least "I don't like this life...." Not just for MLB players. Kids leaving home and one or both spouses retiring is a big change in the relationship dynamic and I've seen some separations come out of that. My wife and I are empty nesters but still both working - I guess when I retire I'll promise to spend to more time out of her hair on hobbies like banter about trade deadline rumors. Quote
Tenacious D Posted Friday at 07:32 PM Posted Friday at 07:32 PM 8 minutes ago, lordstanley said: Not just for MLB players. Kids leaving home and one or both spouses retiring is a big change in the relationship dynamic and I've seen some separations come out of that. My wife and I are empty nesters but still both working - I guess when I retire I'll promise to spend to more time out of her hair on hobbies like banter about trade deadline rumors. Who says we want you? 3 Quote
oblong Posted Friday at 07:42 PM Posted Friday at 07:42 PM 17 minutes ago, lordstanley said: Not just for MLB players. Kids leaving home and one or both spouses retiring is a big change in the relationship dynamic and I've seen some separations come out of that. My wife and I are empty nesters but still both working - I guess when I retire I'll promise to spend to more time out of her hair on hobbies like banter about trade deadline rumors. yep, good point. We noticed a trend in our peers when the kids got to be in HS or later... a rash of divorces. My wife was freaking out. LIke it was contagious. 1 Quote
chasfh Posted yesterday at 01:08 PM Posted yesterday at 01:08 PM (edited) On 7/10/2025 at 11:54 PM, papalawrence said: But the trade proposed 2 top 10, plus Jobe and other pieces. This trade would greatly Trump what Det gave up for Miggy and Dontelle This is the Tigers forum. Careful with your CAPS. 😉 Edited yesterday at 01:19 PM by chasfh Quote
chasfh Posted yesterday at 01:11 PM Posted yesterday at 01:11 PM On 7/11/2025 at 8:36 AM, romad1 said: My memory of April 2008 was that I thought the Marlins had traded us two problem alcoholics for all our best prospects. When game 163 came around in 2009, Miggy was having some sort of problem prior to that game that he had to apologize for. So, while a great player...he was a tinderbox that maybe the Marlins thought he needed to be sent out of Miami. Dontrelle also was dealing with things and ultimately he could not return to his previous effectiveness. While I can see where you’re coming from, I do like the idea of Miggy wearing the Olde English D in the Hall. Quote
chasfh Posted yesterday at 01:16 PM Posted yesterday at 01:16 PM On 7/11/2025 at 8:54 AM, romad1 said: oh yeah...2009 Miggy was still a work in progress https://www.mlive.com/tigers/2009/10/police_called_during_tigers_sl.html According to Birmingham Police Chief Richard Patterson, Roseangel called 911 at 6 a.m. Saturday morning after the couple fought because he came home intoxicated and loud after drinking at Birmingham's Townsend Hotel with an unspecified fellow Venezuelan who plays for the Chicago White Sox. There was one Venezuelan on that White Sox team. https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/g/garcifr03.shtml Quote
casimir Posted yesterday at 01:23 PM Posted yesterday at 01:23 PM On 7/6/2025 at 2:26 PM, Cruzer1 said: I think some guys are underrated because they don't play a premium position, or all they do is hit. Gimme hitters, please! Gimme hitters that can field and fielders that can hit. 1 Quote
casimir Posted yesterday at 01:30 PM Posted yesterday at 01:30 PM On 7/9/2025 at 5:34 PM, RandyMarsh said: Somebody I have my eye on is Mike Soroka of the Nationals. Yes at first glance you see his ERA is above 5 but that doesn't tell the whole story. He has an xERA at 3.19 which is elite, has elite K% along with BB%. Also has been pitching better of late. I would gamble on things correcting themselves and him getting luckier in the second half. Also last year when put in relief he excelled with a 2.75 ERA and 15 k/9, so even if we don't need him as a starter in the playoffs he could be the swing and miss guy we desperately need out of the bullpen. Also just 27 so somebody that we could look to keep if he performs well down the stretch. I think if Harris makes a move, its going to along the lines of "hidden" numerals as you allude to here. I think he's likely to acquire a non name that most folks are going to find underwhelming at first blush. But upon further inspection/explanation, some of those folks will say, oh, sure, I saw that coming. Quote
casimir Posted yesterday at 01:36 PM Posted yesterday at 01:36 PM On 7/10/2025 at 11:48 PM, buddha said: there's also a universe where we have two hall of fame starters in their prime and get swept by the giants. 😞 There is not a universe with an optimistic buddha. None, zip, zero, zilch, not'ta. 1 Quote
buddha Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM Posted yesterday at 02:05 PM 28 minutes ago, casimir said: There is not a universe with an optimistic buddha. None, zip, zero, zilch, not'ta. Quote
ICroupier Posted yesterday at 02:34 PM Posted yesterday at 02:34 PM 1 hour ago, casimir said: I think if Harris makes a move, it's going to along the lines of "hidden" numerals as you allude to here. I think he's likely to acquire a non name that most folks are going to find underwhelming at first blush. But upon further inspection/explanation, some of those folks will say, oh, sure, I saw that coming. Soroka would be fine as the third-best pitcher acquired at the deadline. If he's the headliner, this season will not end well. Quote
casimir Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, ICroupier said: Soroka would be fine as the third-best pitcher acquired at the deadline. If he's the headliner, this season will not end well. I think that's too simplistic of an opinion. Harris sold last season. How did that work out? Quote
ICroupier Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, casimir said: I think that's too simplistic of an opinion. Harris sold last season. How did that work out? With a season that exceeded expectations but was still a disappointment. How's that for nuance? Baseball is a fickle sport. Windows can close as fast as they open. This team has a legit shot this year. The Dodgers, Yankees, Phillies, Astros are all vulnerable. And while a handful of trades won't guarantee success, there's at least the chance to improve on status quo. Edited 21 hours ago by ICroupier Quote
chasfh Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago FWIW, even though it ended in sucky fashion, I was not at all disappointed with last season. 2 Quote
Tiger337 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Just now, chasfh said: FWIW, even though it ended in sucky fashion, I was not at all disappointed with last season. Me neither. It was a historic finish and a great story. The post-season is mostly a crap shoot. If you base your satisfaction on whether or not your team wins the World Series, you have a 97% chance of being disappointed! 2 Quote
IdahoBert Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago So 18 days until the trading deadline. I don’t know if the chances of getting a good deal depends on waiting until the last moment or not. Quote
Tenacious D Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Just now, IdahoBert said: So 18 days until the trading deadline. I don’t know if the chances of getting a good deal depends on waiting until the last moment or not. With so many potential buyers, the few sellers will probably put a high price on any team that doesn’t want to wait until the trade deadline. Quote
sagnam Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, Tiger337 said: Me neither. It was a historic finish and a great story. The post-season is mostly a crap shoot. If you base your satisfaction on whether or not your team wins the World Series, you have a 97% chance of being disappointed! Is this one of the 87.2% of statistics that are made up? Quote
Tiger337 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 8 minutes ago, sagnam said: Is this one of the 87.2% of statistics that are made up? 29 out of 30 rounds up to 97%. I know it's different for different teams, but it averages out to 97%. Quote
RatkoVarda Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago 23 minutes ago, IdahoBert said: So 18 days until the trading deadline. I don’t know if the chances of getting a good deal depends on waiting until the last moment or not. sellers holdout for best deal, so unless you are offering 1 of the big 5 now, sellers will wait to see if you blink Quote
IdahoBert Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago I sure am glad that the people at the helm of this team have as much intelligence and practical experience as they’ve already demonstrated. Last year, when we all thought they had thrown in the towel and given up, things turned around in a remarkable manner. I don’t know if we can expect lightning to strike twice, but if necessary I’m willing to stand in the rain in open field in my bare feet near a body of water holding a 20 foot metal rod in the air if that’s what it takes. Quote
Arlington Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 5 hours ago, RatkoVarda said: sellers holdout for best deal, so unless you are offering 1 of the big 5 now, sellers will wait to see if you blink That seems to be the case. With rentals though, you're getting a little over 60 days of service plus the post season. Getting a rental at the beginning of July rather than the end gives you 50% more playing time. A smart GM would cut through all that and grab some players early Quote
papalawrence Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago I don't see Harris as the overpaying type. They clearly need bullpen and SP help. Will be an interesting 2-3 weeks Quote
Tiger337 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Arlington said: That seems to be the case. With rentals though, you're getting a little over 60 days of service plus the post season. Getting a rental at the beginning of July rather than the end gives you 50% more playing time. A smart GM would cut through all that and grab some players early That might work, but most of the definite sellers right now are weak teams without a lot of talent. In 2 or 3 weeks, there could be more sellers and more attractive players available. Quote
sagnam Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 57 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: That might work, but most of the definite sellers right now are weak teams without a lot of talent. In 2 or 3 weeks, there could be more sellers and more attractive players available. Plus, the players worth trading for are a more valuable commodity to the team today than whatever prospect they get. Dumping some of their better players in early July will hurt attendance, even if attendance is already not that great. So, unless you blow a team away with an offer they will likely believe that the offers will only get better as the deadline nears and teams get caught up in the rush or a team gets a little too desperate. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.