Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think this is a worthy topic of a separate thread.  He's clearly losing his faculties and in full Emperor's New Cloths mode with his staff. 

Trump Threatens ABC's Karl On 'Hate Speech' Crackdown

Quote

When Karl asked about criticism of the crackdown, Trump launched into a rant threatening to go after Karl, and referencing the lawsuit he settled with ABC this year:

JONATHAN KARL: And what do you make Pam Bondi saying she’s going to go after hate speech? Is that, I mean, a lot of people, a lot of your allies say hate speech is free speech.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: She’d probably go after people like you! Because you treat me so unfairly! It’s hate! You have a lot of hate in your heart!

JONATHAN KARL: Would that be appropriate?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Maybe they’ll come after ABC. Well, ABC paid me 16 million dollars recently for a form of hate speech, right? Your company paid me $16 million for a form of hate speech, so maybe they’ll have to go after you.

Look, we want everything to be fair. It hasn’t been fair. And the radical left has done tremendous damage to the country, but we’re fixing it.

We have right now the hottest country anywhere in the world. And remember, one year ago, our country was dead. And now Washington D.C. Is fixed, and I fix it.

The mayor was fine. The mayor, the mayor was just fine, okay? The mayor had the sick city for many years. She’s been mayor for many years.

The one that fixed it was me and my people, and it is so safe. You should take your beautiful wife tonight and have dinner down there.

You won’t be shot, you won’t get accosted, you won’t even be looked at incorrectly by anybody.

Washington, D.C. Is safe, now we’re going to Memphis where it’s pretty rough, to put it mildly. And then we’re gonna have to go. A friend of mine who is a big railroader.

Trump rambled about railroads and Chicago for a full two minutes more.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Did Trump make an indirect pass at Jonathan Karl's wife here?

Probably.  We likely find out that she dumped him for Karl and he's never gotten over it.  An entire wing of his Manhattan home devoted to poetry and drawings he's done to woo her.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Plus the Trolls. 

You know what else is weird? The way you turned on Trump. And you have the unmitigated gall to call yourself a Republican and a patriot? You should be arrested for trading in stolen valor. Hell, you just might be sooner than you think. Better grow an extra set of eyes. 😉

Posted
1 minute ago, chasfh said:

You know what else is weird? The way you turned on Trump. And you have the unmitigated gall to call yourself a Republican and a patriot? You should be arrested for trading in stolen valor. Hell, you just might be sooner than you think. Better grow an extra set of eyes. 😉

"Called"

My beliefs remain the same: 

Free trade, collective security, the rule of law. 

The modern GOP stands for the opposite of those things. 

Posted
Just now, romad1 said:

"Called"

My beliefs remain the same: 

Free trade, collective security, the rule of law. 

The modern GOP stands for the opposite of those things. 

In other words, you are now a Demonrat.

Prepare to die. 😉

Posted

I'm less hostile to the idea of a public good than I used to be for sure.  

1 minute ago, chasfh said:

In other words, you are now a Demonrat.

Prepare to die. 😉

 

Posted

That NYT lawsuit is amazingly Emperor's New Clothsy (ENC).   He has never made a mistake and everyone loves him according to the filing.  He's only disliked by jealous people who lack his superior genetic make up. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, romad1 said:

That NYT lawsuit is amazingly Emperor's New Clothsy (ENC).   He has never made a mistake and everyone loves him according to the filing.  He's only disliked by jealous people who lack his superior genetic make up. 

 

Awesome.  Let’s get him in a room and answering questions - discovery.  And ask the Epstein questions.  
 

 

Posted

 

22 hours ago, romad1 said:

Trump Threatens ABC's Karl On 'Hate Speech' Crackdown

"Trump rambled about railroads and Chicago for a full two minutes more."

This needs to be shared/seen more.  I was always going to vote for Biden, but I was truly concerned that he didn't have the mental ability to do the job anymore.  

Most people are still dismissing Trumps mental issues with 'well, he always rambled'.  That is true, but he's not just rambling anymore.  He's always had that ADHD type issue where a topic could derail him, but he'd get out his talking points and eventually round back.  He is completely lost now, it is remarkably different IMO.  

Posted
49 minutes ago, Deleterious said:

Seems like a good time for the right and left to come together to put an age cap on the presidency.  Something like, you have to be under 70 on inauguration day.  

 

46 minutes ago, antrat said:

Be nice if both sides came together and agreed to elect presidents that aren't morons and who follow the law.

IDK, in the end, I don't think anything can save a democracy from stupid voters.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

 

IDK, in the end, I don't think anything can save a democracy from stupid voters.

citizens united repealed, national redistricting based on population, ethics rules for legislators and jurists. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, romad1 said:

citizens united repealed, national redistricting based on population, ethics rules for legislators and jurists. 

We've been on a slow march for a while now. 
America Inc

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, antrat said:

Be nice if both sides came together and agreed to elect presidents that aren't morons and who follow the law.

I think it's only one side we have to bring around to that idea.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, chasfh said:

I think it's only one side we have to bring around to that idea.

I'm not trying to both sides this as we both will agree which side is the far bigger threat to our democracy, but please remember you guys ran a guy that couldn't meet with more than 1 person in his administration for his last 2 years and the one time he has to be in front of the cameras, he completely fell apart, leading to the party scrambling for option 2 with very little time to allow that option to define themselves (and definitely no time for the party to agree on who would be a best 2nd option.  

Posted
1 hour ago, ewsieg said:

I'm not trying to both sides this as we both will agree which side is the far bigger threat to our democracy, but please remember you guys ran a guy that couldn't meet with more than 1 person in his administration for his last 2 years and the one time he has to be in front of the cameras, he completely fell apart, leading to the party scrambling for option 2 with very little time to allow that option to define themselves (and definitely no time for the party to agree on who would be a best 2nd option.  

The criteria being considered here were (1) not a moron, and (2) follow the law. Biden was both.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      310
    • Most Online
      704

    Newest Member
    Grubby
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...