Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

I would offer the QO to Torres and Flaherty. The pick the Tigers get (if they are still getting revenue sharing money) if they decline would be pretty high with four of the final six picks in the draft being known the CBT penalty box and their picks being moved back 8 spots. That would like be a 26th and 27th pick or something in that range.

Does that work the same way when a player declines their option?  Would the QO have to be more than what was declined?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

I would offer the QO to Torres and Flaherty. The pick the Tigers get (if they are still getting revenue sharing money) if they decline would be pretty high with four of the final six picks in the draft being known the CBT penalty box and their picks being moved back 8 spots. That would like be a 26th and 27th pick or something in that range.

Seems like a no brainer, I can't see any downside risk if either of them accept and return.  The IF could get a little crowded if McGonigle is ready to come up at some point next season. That situation could resolve itself if Meadows doesn't find his bat and Javy finishes his contract in CF.

Posted
15 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Does that work the same way when a player declines their option?  Would the QO have to be more than what was declined?

The QO is for a set amount for all players.  It’s expected to be around $22 mil for 2026. And yes, if he declines his option, we can offer it.

Posted
3 hours ago, 4hzglory said:

Why would we be trading him at the deadline?  Especially after 2 consecutive playoff seasons, and with the last year of Skubal, they are not going to be going into the offseason thinking "Is player x going to lose value by the trade deadline?"  "They are going to be does player X help us get to the postseason again with a chance to advance?"

You just made my point for me.  If they decide to trade him, it will be this offseason.  I doubt they’ll let he and Skubal both walk.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

You just made my point for me.  If they decide to trade him, it will be this offseason.  I doubt they’ll let he and Skubal both walk.

I think there is close to zero chance they trade Skubal and that it’s considerably more likely they try and extend Mize rather than trade him.

Posted
1 hour ago, 4hzglory said:

The QO is for a set amount for all players.  It’s expected to be around $22 mil for 2026. And yes, if he declines his option, we can offer it.

Gotcha.  It’d make sense for him to decline his option and then take the QO.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/10/2025 at 4:32 PM, Tiger337 said:

Right, you need to go into the season with at least 7 viable starters.  

I agree they should seven guys they can slot into a rotation if needed, although practically by definition, your #6 and #7 starters will end up being no better than #4 or #5 in your rotation even if you need them, and it would be even worse if they're replacing two of your top three, and that would be a suboptimal rotation. Meaning, we're not going to be carrying seven guys who could all be top three in a playoff rotation. We're going to have a couple of Keider Monteros in such a mix. That's what signing Cobb and Urquidy and trading for Morton and Paddack was supposed to accomplish.

Posted
22 hours ago, Tenacious D said:

I suspect Urquidy will be in the mix nest season.  His contract is only $4M in ‘26– a bargain compared to recent lottery picks, Maeda and Cobb.

They're definitely going to give him a look. They're going to give a few guys a look. I also think we're going to have to get at least one guy to replace Flaherty, and maybe another one-year guy to push Jobe. It won't be in-house options only.

Posted (edited)

How sure are the forum's medical mavens that Olson pitches next year? He spent the whole year on rehab, practically speaking.

Edited by HeyAbbott
Posted
13 minutes ago, HeyAbbott said:

How sure are the forum's medical mavens that Olson pitches next year? He spent the whole year on rehab, practically speaking.

"RHP Reese Olson

Injury: Right shoulder strain

IL date: July 28 (60-day IL)

Expected return: 2026

Status: Working on throwing progression, but not yet throwing bullpen sessions and not close to competition. (Updated Oct. 14)"

Hopefully he will be fine. No surgery but he's not fully recovered yet.

Posted
20 minutes ago, HeyAbbott said:

How sure are the forum's medical mavens that Olson pitches next year? He spent the whole year on rehab, practically speaking.

Think it’s Olsen

<ducks>

Posted

I never like to make assumptions about injured pitchers.  I hope Olson has a strong healthy season, but I am not penciling him for 30 games or anything close to that.  They need to acquire another legitimate MLB starter even if Flaherty stays.  

  • Thanks 2
Posted
2 hours ago, HeyAbbott said:

How sure are the forum's medical mavens that Olson pitches next year? He spent the whole year on rehab, practically speaking.

Supposedly he may have been available had we made the WS.  Seems like he would be good to go for Spring.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, This is the year said:

Im thinking Skubal-Olson-Mize-Flarety-Melton are the starters. 

I’d like to see us sign one more legitimate starter—maybe Dylan Cease—and start Olson or Flaherty as a late inning reliever—and then convert them back to starter when the inevitable injury happens.  Depending on when Jobe is able to return, maybe use him in a late inning role as well.  I’d trust that more than bringing in bargain bin relievers who are free agents.

 

I would also like to get Danny Coloumbe so we have a better LHP out of the pen than the Holton/Hurter combo

Edited by monkeytargets39
Posted
3 hours ago, This is the year said:

Im thinking Skubal-Olson-Mize-Flarety-Melton are the starters. 

Hinch was pretty clear in his statement that Melton was a starter, he just didn't say where.

  • Confused 1
Posted

I really don’t think Flaherty is going to pick up his option. He can do better elsewhere, especially in years. Unless we give him years, which, that would make me nervous.

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I really don’t think Flaherty is going to pick up his option. He can do better elsewhere, especially in years. Unless we give him years, which, that would make me nervous.

I think this one is a reasonably close call. And if he does decline do the Tigers make the QO? I think that's an easier 'yes' call. If the Tigers don't that tells me Harris is pretty confident he can do better somewhere else, but it would also make me wonder if that confidence is justified. 🐰

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

BTW, Tigers.com lists the name as Olson.

I am not sure what Flaherty will do, I don't think he stays. I doubt how long Olson lasts in 2026 and I doubt Jobe's impact. An absolute minimum one one quality starting pitcher is required. That assumes some maturation as a pitcher by some of the internal candidates.

Posted
15 hours ago, monkeytargets39 said:

I’d like to see us sign one more legitimate starter—maybe Dylan Cease—and ...

I like the sign-Cease idea.

Don't know the cost or if he even has interest in Detroit...

But I like the idea...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...