chasfh Posted Saturday at 12:13 PM Posted Saturday at 12:13 PM The answer is also in the Umpire Manual. Interpretation #78, titled “Ball Strikes Bird or Animal,” reads: If a batted or thrown ball strikes a bird in flight or other animal on the playing field, the ball is considered alive and in play, the same as if it had not touched the bird or animal. If a pitched ball strikes a bird in flight or other animal on the playing field, the pitch is nullified and play shall be resumed with the previous count. So in the Randy Johnson scenario, the umpire nullifies the pitch entirely and the count simply reverts to whatever it was before. No pitch recorded, no ball or strike added, no dead ball award to runners. Just wipe it off the books and go again. After a moment of silence, of course. The closest numbered Rule in the Book this interpretationt probably draws from conceptually would be Rule 8.01(c): “Each umpire has authority to rule on any point not specifically covered in these rules.” Me, I’m just trying to imagine how a pitched ball could strike any “other animal”. Quote
NorthWoods Posted Saturday at 12:21 PM Posted Saturday at 12:21 PM 7 minutes ago, chasfh said: Me, I’m just trying to imagine how a pitched ball could strike any “other animal”. A bat. Quote
chasfh Posted Saturday at 12:27 PM Posted Saturday at 12:27 PM 4 minutes ago, NorthWoods said: A bat. It would be really unusual for a bat to be hanging around the playing area of a major league stadium without anyone noticing it or play being stopped to deal with it. Quote
NorthWoods Posted Saturday at 04:33 PM Posted Saturday at 04:33 PM 4 hours ago, chasfh said: It would be really unusual for a bat to be hanging around the playing area of a major league stadium without anyone noticing it or play being stopped to deal with it. Well, a bat seemed more plausible than a flying squirrel. Quote
Tiger337 Posted Saturday at 04:46 PM Posted Saturday at 04:46 PM Did Chas miss a joke that flew right over his head? Quote
CMRivdogs Posted Saturday at 05:09 PM Posted Saturday at 05:09 PM 35 minutes ago, NorthWoods said: Well, a bat seemed more plausible than a flying squirrel. They just hang around Richmond Quote
chasfh Posted Saturday at 09:57 PM Posted Saturday at 09:57 PM 5 hours ago, Tiger337 said: Did Chas miss a joke that flew right over his head? Northwoods might have, too. 😏 I do appreciate the layering in your own post. 1 Quote
NorthWoods Posted Saturday at 10:54 PM Posted Saturday at 10:54 PM 55 minutes ago, chasfh said: Northwoods might have, too. 😏 I do appreciate the layering in your own post. I'm capable of missing jokes in person or online. Quote
Motor City Sonics Posted Sunday at 12:05 AM Author Posted Sunday at 12:05 AM Alex Cora out as Red Sox manager. One of the best managers they ever had. How long until Alex is named Mets skipper? Quote
IdahoBert Posted Sunday at 01:45 AM Posted Sunday at 01:45 AM Hinch headed to Red Sox! Not. He has already lost his soul once I can’t imagine him wanting to lose it again. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted Sunday at 02:27 AM Posted Sunday at 02:27 AM 41 minutes ago, IdahoBert said: Hinch headed to Red Sox! Not. He has already lost his soul once I can’t imagine him wanting to lose it again. trick question: If you had to offer Hinch Harris' job to keep him, would you? Quote
Sports_Freak Posted Sunday at 10:45 AM Posted Sunday at 10:45 AM 17 hours ago, Tiger337 said: Did Chas miss a joke that flew right over his head? Quote
Sports_Freak Posted Sunday at 10:49 AM Posted Sunday at 10:49 AM 22 hours ago, NorthWoods said: A bat. If an adult was a bat boy for a day, would he be called a batman? Quote
chasfh Posted Sunday at 02:01 PM Posted Sunday at 02:01 PM 12 hours ago, IdahoBert said: Hinch headed to Red Sox! Not. He has already lost his soul once I can’t imagine him wanting to lose it again. Wait, why is the idea of Hinch leaving the Tigers and going to Boston showing up in multiple threads all of a sudden? I do a search on the idea and there is zero coming up about it. Where is this chatter originating? Quote
Tiger337 Posted Sunday at 02:07 PM Posted Sunday at 02:07 PM 5 minutes ago, chasfh said: Wait, why is the idea of Hinch leaving the Tigers and going to Boston showing up in multiple threads all of a sudden? I do a search on the idea and there is zero coming up about it. Where is this chatter originating? It all comes from the same person Quote
casimir Posted Sunday at 02:16 PM Posted Sunday at 02:16 PM The Hinch to Boston thing makes sense when you consider he was there just last weekend. 1 Quote
IdahoBert Posted yesterday at 01:23 AM Posted yesterday at 01:23 AM 9 of the 15 clubs in the AL are sub .500 teams. Quote
IdahoBert Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago So is Boston’s firing of their manager and much of their coaching staff during the early season simply a sign of desperation rather than cogent strategic thinking? I can see wanting to “change team culture“ and everything but when all you do is generally promote people from your minor-league affiliates, it sure seems like desperation to me. Just curious what more astute observers than myself think. Quote
NorthWoods Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, IdahoBert said: So is Boston’s firing of their manager and much of their coaching staff during the early season simply a sign of desperation rather than cogent strategic thinking? I can see wanting to “change team culture“ and everything but when all you do is generally promote people from your minor-league affiliates, it sure seems like desperation to me. Just curious what more astute observers than myself think. It was a "placate the fans" move. They were demanding heads on a platter and got them. Quote
IdahoBert Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 29 minutes ago, NorthWoods said: It was a "placate the fans" move. They were demanding heads on a platter and got them. That’s kind of sad, because the fans are idiots, unlike us because we are merely morans. Quote
casimir Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 59 minutes ago, NorthWoods said: It was a "placate the fans" move. They were demanding heads on a platter and got them. Seems silly to me. It’s still only April. They rolled off, what, half of their coaching staff? And then reverberations to the minor leagues because managers/coaches down there were part of the domino effect. Maybe I’m wrong, but unless the team needed a change in culture, it just seems like a desperate move(s). 1 Quote
IdahoBert Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, casimir said: Seems silly to me. It’s still only April. They rolled off, what, half of their coaching staff? And then reverberations to the minor leagues because managers/coaches down there were part of the domino effect. Maybe I’m wrong, but unless the team needed a change in culture, it just seems like a desperate move(s). Yeah, I think it makes ownership look stupid and weak. Are Red Sox fans really this entitled? I don’t want disparage the entirety of any fan base because there are always fans there who are sincere astute fans. I can’t help but think this is an over reaction by the owner. Quote
theroundsquare Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago what's that saying, you can't fire all the players, so fire the manager Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.