Hongbit Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago What’s next is becoming a constituent of a Republican Senator spreading the maga agenda on your behalf. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 33 minutes ago, pfife said: This post is absolutely outrageous. The audacity you have to inform yourself and then push it so far overboard that you use that information to have your own opinion about your own vote? What next are you going to work your ass off for the dem nominee whoever it is AGAIN???? I'm sorry for voting based on policy positions and stances on issues. Next time I'll make sure to vote based on who does and doesn't like Hasan Piker and who is acceptable to Chuck Schumer. I'll also make sure to do no research into the candidates on the issues. For the record, when he ran for Governor in 2018, I actually voted for Gretchen Whitmer in the primary over him. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Hongbit said: What’s next is becoming a constituent of a Republican Senator spreading the maga agenda on your behalf. I don't want to put words in your mouth and make a bad faith argument here. So rather than assume I'll ask, what is it about Abdul in your eyes that makes him unelectable? I've met the guy a dozen times and he is one of the most affable, jovial, likable, personable human beings you will ever meet. The dude radiates charisma and is full of charm. He's a really strong public speaker and does a great job relating to the room he's in and explaining his positions on issues. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: I don't want to put words in your mouth and make a bad faith argument here. So rather than assume I'll ask, what is it about Abdul in your eyes that makes him unelectable? I've met the guy a dozen times and he is one of the most affable, jovial, likable, personable human beings you will ever meet. The dude radiates charisma and is full of charm. He's a really strong public speaker and does a great job relating to the room he's in and explaining his positions on issues. The fact that he got dog walked by Whitmer, supported defund the police, made misogynist comments about McMorrow, his chief of security resigned because of his antisemitism, campaigns with a guy who said we deserved 9/11, dabbles in election denial, and can only talk vaguely about Medicare for All that will never get passed. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: I'm sorry for voting based on policy positions and stances on issues. Next time I'll make sure to vote based on who does and doesn't like Hasan Piker and who is acceptable to Chuck Schumer. I'll also make sure to do no research into the candidates on the issues. For the record, when he ran for Governor in 2018, I actually voted for Gretchen Whitmer in the primary over him. Oh, so who someone campaigns with doesn’t matter now? Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Motown Bombers said: Oh, so who someone campaigns with doesn’t matter now? Yes, it matters. Well, I guess it selectively matters. Because if they are a white, alleged rapist, it's ok. But if they are someone like Hasan it is not. Furthermore, Elissa Slotkin has gone on Bill Maher's show numerous times and I don't see her getting a bunch of **** for going on the Democratic version of Tucker Carlson. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: Yes, it matters. Well, I guess it selectively matters. Because if they are a white, alleged rapist, it's ok. But if they are someone like Hasan it is not. Furthermore, Elissa Slotkin has gone on Bill Maher's show numerous times and I don't see her getting a bunch of **** for going on the Democratic version of Tucker Carlson. So you agree with Hasan that the US deserved 9/11? His anti Western sentiment? His poverty tourism of Cuba? Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said: So you agree with Hasan that the US deserved 9/11? His anti Western sentiment? His poverty tourism of Cuba? So you believe that Bill Clinton allegedly raping woman is ok? Edited 3 hours ago by Mr.TaterSalad Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: So you believe that Bill Clinton allegedly raping woman is ok? I mean, there isn’t evidence Clinton did it. These are things Piker actually said. You’re also ignoring everything else with El-Sayed from defund the police to people quoting his campaign over antisemitism. Quote
chasfh Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, romad1 said: Look at that, Rubio got Erika Kirk to infiltrate the Vance campaign. She already plotted Charlie Kirk's murder on behalf of the zionists, etc. (SARCASM) On the one hand, I have to ask, is he the best she could do? On the other, if the Intertubes are to be believed, at $12 million, he's worth six times she is. Aim low, that's where you go. Quote
romad1 Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, chasfh said: On the one hand, I have to ask, is he the best she could do? On the other, if the Intertubes are to be believed, at $12 million, he's worth six times she is. Aim low, that's where you go. He's that close to being president. He could order diet coke by pushing a button! Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: Yes, it matters. Well, I guess it selectively matters. Because if they are a white, alleged rapist, it's ok. But if they are someone like Hasan it is not. Furthermore, Elissa Slotkin has gone on Bill Maher's show numerous times and I don't see her getting a bunch of **** for going on the Democratic version of Tucker Carlson. just as an aside, I wouldn't compare going to interview shows run by people you may not like (Like Pete B to Fox) where you have a chance to reach an audience that you can't by other means, to campaigning with someone - it's a whole different order of magnitude of validation. Quote
chasfh Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just now, romad1 said: He's that close to being president. He could order diet coke by pushing a button! You're right, of course, that's her calculation, although he can never get there on his own. There would have to be some sort of putsch. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 23 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: just as an aside, I wouldn't compare going to interview shows run by people you may not like (Like Pete B to Fox) where you have a chance to reach an audience that you can't by other means, to campaigning with someone - it's a whole different order of magnitude of validation. Also, Bill Clinton never actually campaigned with Harris as far as I remember. El-Sayed sought out Piker for a campaign event. Quote
Hongbit Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mr.TaterSalad said: I don't want to put words in your mouth and make a bad faith argument here. So rather than assume I'll ask, what is it about Abdul in your eyes that makes him unelectable? I've met the guy a dozen times and he is one of the most affable, jovial, likable, personable human beings you will ever meet. The dude radiates charisma and is full of charm. He's a really strong public speaker and does a great job relating to the room he's in and explaining his positions on issues. It’s going to be a very close race. I question whether he can connect with enough of the voters in the middle that can be swayed. It may not be right and it may not be fair but his name is Abdul El-Sayed. That’s something that he’s going to have to get over in this state. History also tells us what happens when candidates count on the college and young voters in midterms. They don’t show up as much as in Presidential cycles. That’s a real issue for Abdul in tight race. I also fear that Trump will use ICE as a weapon in Dearborn and that will also have an impact on voter turnout. Those numbers will trend lower for any Democrat candidate so if Abdul is counting on Dearborn coming in huge that may have an impact. Quote
Motown Bombers Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Hongbit said: It’s going to be a very close race. I question whether he can connect with enough of the voters in the middle that can be swayed. It may not be right and it may not be fair but his name is Abdul El-Sayed. That’s something that he’s going to have to get over in this state. History also tells us what happens when candidates count on the college and young voters in midterms. They don’t show up as much as in Presidential cycles. That’s a real issue for Abdul in tight race. I also fear that Trump will use ICE as a weapon in Dearborn and that will also have an impact on voter turnout. Those numbers will trend lower for any Democrat candidate so if Abdul is counting on Dearborn coming in huge that may have an impact. Whitmer won Michigan with a decrease in Dearborn voters. They turned against Whitmer due to homophobia. Even without Wayne County, she would have won. I don't think El-Sayed can win without Dearborn. It's also going to be hard to convince voters in the middle to vote for the defund the police guy. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.