monkeytargets39 Posted May 14 Posted May 14 He’s pretty clearly safe. Not sure wtf is happening Quote
NorthWoods Posted May 14 Posted May 14 I know it's not true but good lord it seems like Detroit teams always get jobbed on calls, reviews and non calls....... 1 Quote
RedRamage Posted May 14 Posted May 14 12 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said: He’s pretty clearly safe. Not sure wtf is happening Should be 4-3 now... Quote
GalagaGuy Posted May 14 Posted May 14 Is it really too much to ask that outfield walls be designed so you don't need a review to determine whether or not a ball left the park? 1 Quote
Tiger337 Posted May 14 Posted May 14 He definitely looked safe, but camera angles are tricky and the views I saw all had the glove partly hidden. I think the intention of the replay is to overturn calls which are so obvious that there is zero doubt. This was close to 0 but not 0. Quote
Crazy Cat Gentleman Posted May 14 Posted May 14 Wenceel will totally be called out because the Tigers can't buy a break. Quote
theroundsquare Posted May 14 Posted May 14 Sigh. They already scored their runs today. Now what? Quote
casimir Posted May 14 Author Posted May 14 4 hours ago, CaliforniaDreaming said: It is getting more difficult for me to care... April and May showers bring October playoff games. —- Casimir 3:16 Quote
Biff Mayhem Posted May 14 Posted May 14 What in the actual flying foxtrot is going on with this team? Quote
kdog Posted May 14 Posted May 14 Horrendous stuff...I'll comfort myself that they have 110 games left. Quote
RedRamage Posted May 14 Posted May 14 According to the rule it has to be clear evidence to over turn a call, right? So, one could argue that even though it looked like Workman was safe, it just wasn't clear enough to over turn. Benetti made the argument that this isn't how we've seen it applied to challenges over the season, but if you want to go by the strict rule, then yeah... you could argue that maybe there just wasn't enough there. So, what about Perez at first? Supposedly there was clear evidence... we haven't seen it, at least not yet. I'll certainly accept that there might be a view that we haven't seen that makes it clear, but I'd sure like to see it. As for this last one: If I'm just judging by some of the replays, I'd say I'd probably call him safe, but... it certainly isn't perfectly clear. There's no smoking gun there in my opinion that says it's obvious he was safe. It sure seems like they applied that the idea of: "He's probably safe based on what we can think we can see, so overturn it." Which of course ISN'T what they did with the Workman play. Of course I reserve the right to change my opinion on this if we see better video in the future. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.