Jump to content

05/27/2026 6:40p EDT Los Angeles Angels at Detroit Tigers


Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, Nate7474 said:

This is frustrating for me. He was decent against lefties as a rookie. There is no reason to not try and develop him. 

I don't understand why Hinch pigeon holed him as a platoon player at 23 years of age.  

That's when the front office needed to step in and tell Hinch to play him.

Hinch is an easy guy to dislike and this is another reason to dislike him.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

I don't understand why Hinch pigeon holed him as a platoon player at 23 years of age.  

That's when the front office needed to step in and tell Hinch to play him.

Hinch is an easy guy to dislike and this is another reason to dislike him.

Wait until McGonigle goes 0-8 against lefties, Hinch will start platooning him? Gotta play the guy with the .167 batting average. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Wait until McGonigle goes 0-8 against lefties, Hinch will start platooning him? Gotta play the guy with the .167 batting average. 

I pointed out that Barry Bonds hit .218 amd .225 against lefties in his first 2 seasons and would have been a platoon player in Hinch's eyes.

  • Haha 1
Posted

This Hinch platoons everyone argument is getting really ridiculous.  Sure, I'd like to see Keith get a shot at playing every day too, but apparently the Tigers have seen something that makes them think he shouldn't be facing LHP.  They have access to all kinds of technology that we don't have.  Maybe they are wrong in this case, but...the Bonds and McGonogle comparisons are stupid.  Those guys are/were complete players and they would be wanted in the line-up regardless of any platoon disadvantage.  Keith is not Bonds or McGonigle.  He doesn't have a position, he's not fast, he has shown little power.  He's got a 93 OPS+ against the RHP!  Maybe, he needs to learn how to hit RHP consistently before they put him in there vs LHP.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, tiger2022 said:

I pointed out that Barry Bonds hit .218 amd .225 against lefties in his first 2 seasons and would have been a platoon player in Hinch's eyes.

and there is more to it. An MLB batter makes choices with their set up and approach that can change their susceptibility to the slider away (the big driver of platoon splits). Tell a LHH that LHP is off the table for him and he's going to maximize his approach to hit RHP, at that point he will be less prepared  against any LHP he has to face. That's the self-fulfilling part. Now it's possible  teams have decided that that by having their LLHs optimize to hit RHP combined with RH platoon players further combined with the 3 hitter rule for relievers, they just don't care about having everyday players; they are prepared to just keep switching all the time.  But then you get into a talent constrained situation like the Tigers are in and it's easy to believe that if he had a chance to work at it, a player like Keith would be better hitter against LHP than the pinch hitters the team actually has available to take the other half of his platoon ABs. That's where the potential loss is.

Edited by gehringer_2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...