Jump to content

Where Do Things End With Vlad? (h/t romad1)


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
15 minutes ago, romad1 said:

Putin's 28 point peace plan can suck it.  Ukraine is not going to be bullied. 

The following is an Excerpt from a daily synopsis by Heather Cox Richardson for 11/21/25.

IMG_5698.jpeg

  • Sad 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, smr-nj said:

The following is an Excerpt from a daily synopsis by Heather Cox Richardson for 11/21/25.

IMG_5698.jpeg

I hope the Noble committee is paying attention to all this wonderful peacemaking. (SARCASM)

Posted

I don’t know why Elon would engage in an act of such self-sabotage, but his decision to show country of origin might become the really big deal needed to spur real action against malign foreign influence on American politics and governance. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, romad1 said:

not surprising of course

 

A couple things jumping out at me about this one in particular:

  • Three username changes in a year and a half??
  • Remember when the blue checkmark meant something?
Posted
9 minutes ago, chasfh said:

A couple things jumping out at me about this one in particular:

  • Three username changes in a year and a half??
  • Remember when the blue checkmark meant something?

INRA is a huge payoff in terms of impact for money spent. 

Posted
15 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

about as surprising as the Sun coming up in the East.

Yeah, I don’t think it’s particularly surprising, and it’s not even particularly offensive, either, at least at a theoretical level. One of the jobs of an envoy is to advise the country they’re dispatched to on how to deal with American politics, albeit in a manner that’s consistent with the interests of the United States. The $64 question here is whether advising Russia on how to sell to the US a plan that’s tilted way in their favor against the Ukrainians is actually in America’s interests. I would imagine the majority of this administration would flatly agree that it is.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, chasfh said:

Yeah, I don’t think it’s particularly surprising, and it’s not even particularly offensive, either, at least at a theoretical level. One of the jobs of an envoy is to advise the country they’re dispatched to on how to deal with American politics, albeit in a manner that’s consistent with the interests of the United States. The $64 question here is whether advising Russia on how to sell to the US a plan that’s tilted way in their favor against the Ukrainians is actually in America’s interests. I would imagine the majority of this administration would flatly agree that it is.

The thing to keep in mind is that Trump doesn't care about American Interests - he cares about self-aggrandizement. All he wants in any plan is that it appears to work  - at least externally, and hold together long enough for him to claim the credit. If he thought it was more likely he could bludgeon Putin into accepting a Zelenskyy blueprint, he'd be all over that instead - but of course since Putin impresses him, the thinks the main chance lies on that side.

Sort of like Gaza - Israel is still doing pretty much what it wants, they had already defanged Hamas, all Trump really accomplished was to put a gloss on the status quo and take credit for it. 

Edited by gehringer_2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...