chasfh Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 6 hours ago, romad1 said: context. The stands were not filled and the crowds did not match expectations. America knew this was a Trump birthday party and a show of force by the regime which appropriated US troops and cost $45m. Meanwhile, much more sizable crowds turned out to protest Trump in all 50 states. I guess context must be it, because as I read through the tweet: Planes roared over D.C.: check Tanks rolled along the national mall: check Brass bands resounded: check Thousands of soldiers marched past cheering crowds: check and check Largest show of military might in the capital in more than three decades: check Seems as though the story hit all the points truthfully, so I didn't see the problem, especially since a substantial part of the story itself was devoted to the protests, starting with paragraph #2. If the problem is that they reported on it with taking a clear and firm position against it, or that they reported on it at all, then that's a discussion of a different stripe. Speaking only for myself, I don't hold mainstream media to that standard. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.