lordstanley

I didn't say anything about selling the farm. But to get proven stars like Nylander I'd be willing to put in play a couple of assets like Cossa or Edvinsson or ASP or next year's Boston 1st. Zadina was once an untouchable. We need to break out of this Scrubs 'n Scrubs approach.

Yes, a bold move like Nylander or to a lesser extent DeBrincat is what Yzerman is paid to do. You or I could have signed Justin Holl at 3x$3.5.

Yep, Bertuzzi and Domi are good at offense but neither are particularly tough or physical. The Leafs signed Tyler and Max, not Todd and Tie.

Yes, a win-win for both Toronto and Bertuzzi

Another grand slam!

1x $5.5mm

3-run homer for Carpenter! 7-2. Loving this mile high air.

Dan had just been saying on the radio how Hinch aims for multiple runs in extra inning road games.

Interesting on DeBrincat. So maybe it was Debrincat’s demands not Ottawa’s demands that was or is the obstacle to a deal with the Wings https://ottawasun.com/sports/hockey/nhl/ottawa-senators/garrioch-ottawa-senators-need-help-from-alex-debrincat-to-complete-a-trade General manager Pierre Dorion confirmed Saturday, the day NHL free agency opened, he had given Jackson permission to talk contract with more than one team in an attempt to facilitate a trade, but those trades fell through because DeBrincat’s camp didn’t like the term they were being offered.

I’m losing track, 7? Reimer Lyon Holl Sprong Compher Christian Gostisbehere EDIT: Kostin yesterday makes 8

More on Fischer.

https://twitter.com/craigsmorgan/status/1675280388460257280?s=61&t=don8lQTnTq5FKXq14p2GMw Can a team have three 4th lines?

I believe Tomas Tatar is still unsigned, or was as of a few hours ago.

1-4-1 formation. One goalie, four defensive players, one sniper. Just not sure who the sniper is going to be.

Reimer and Ned signed for identical contracts today so it was like a flip. I’m ok with that but Reimer better be better than he was last year. Which may not happen as he is no spring chicken. Gotta admit, I don’t think I’ve been this bummed about a Wings signing (Holl) since resigning Cleary. I’m reeling, it’s like the bubble has burst on any illusion that Yzerman is playing 3D chess. Holl was SO bad.

This reminds me of the past 2 off seasons of the Tigers. Offseason before last the Tigers went out and made some notable signings like Baez and E-Rod. Team flopped so pulled back this offseason and went cheapo. Wings made some signings last summer like Copp and Perron which gave hope of moving forward. Seemed to be going according to plan until a bad couple of games against Ottawa seems to have freaked out the front office. Sold off two of their best half-dozen players and then went cheapo this offseason, at least so far.

For sure. I could have lived with the Bunting deal although his offensive numbers are inflated by playing on high-scoring Toronto.

Killorn and Bunting both now off the board.

Unless a splash is coming, seems like we are going back in time to about 3 years ago. With Yzerman and Chris Iliitch deciding that we are not close enough to being good so let’s spend as little as possible and buckle up for a bad year but high pick. I sure hope that’s not the case.

Sounds like Reimer will back up Husso, and Lyon will be in GR with chance to be back up if Reimer falters and them certainly in Year 2 after Reiner’s gone.

if I’m interpreting the piece below correctly, Sprong is perceived as a career 4th liner who put up nice offensive numbers out of nowhere last season. So Seattle didn’t want to pay up for a possible fluke. I still think it’s an OK gamble though. Unexpecting though. https://soundofhockey.com/2023/06/30/daniel-sprong-morgan-geekie-no-qualifying-offer/ Why Daniel Sprong didn’t get qualified We have been predicting for some time that Daniel Sprong would not be qualified by the Kraken. Sure enough, the team confirmed that he had not been tendered an offer Friday, making him free to sign elsewhere for the second offseason in a row. The issue with Sprong was not so much that he wasn’t valuable for the Kraken—he certainly was, potting 21 goals and adding 25 assists in a fourth-line role this season—but more that he had arbitration rights that could have resulted in a bigger payday for next season than Seattle was willing to give. By having such a productive season offensively, Sprong would have commanded a huge pay increase over the league minimum $750,000 he made in 2022-23. Clearly, the Kraken weren’t willing to commit a big chunk of cap space to Sprong, who continues to be viewed around the league as a one-way player. We do not think it would have been a stretch for an arbitrator to grant something north of $2 million (or even $3 million?) to a player that just scored 20+ goals.

This is a bit better. Daniel Sprong of the Kraken at 1x$2mm. 21 goals and 21 assists with Seattle last year 26 years old.