Motown Bombers

Believe me, people have been saying…

Ohh now we're into conspiracy theories.

I would like to see Mitchell get the TE2 position. He seems like he can be the Holmes year three improvement candidate like McNeill, Melifonwu and Barnes.

Probably should pay more attention. Candidates backed by FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried pledge to donate campaign cash (nbcnews.com)

The irony is Juanita Broadrrick is Trumper.

Just about his entire 2nd term he was above 50%.

According to the Charity Watchdog, 76% of donations to the Clinton Foundation goes to charity and it has a B+ rating but whatever.

Clinton was very popular when he left office. It was among his highest approval ratings ever. Gore would not have lost voters if he didn't distance himself from Clinton. This is the Gallup polling. He had one of the highest approval ratings of any outgoing president.

This was a fundraiser and not a campaign stop. The Clintons are still powerful fundraisers. This is all hands on deck.

Al Gore lost the 2000 election because he distanced himself from Clinton. He picked Lieberman as his running mate because he was the one Democrat critical of Clinton. At least he won his purity contest.

It's been acknowledged for decades. He was impeached over it. Purity contest.

Ok

We are facing the most consequential election in our lifetime. Our democracy is in peril. Anyone voting and supporting Joe Biden is an ally. I don't give a **** if it is Bill Clinton, Liz Cheney, or Hanibal Lecter. Enough of these purity contests. We did them in 2016 and it has done great damage.

Ok

Ok

**** me, more purity contests.

I'm not even sure what the argument is, but that Tweet got 266,000 views. CNN, Fox, and MSNBC all achieved over 32 million viewers in January.

Meh, independents love that bipartisanship. It's not going to shake up the election but it could be won or lost on the edges.

Nate Silver would be creaming his shorts if Biden went 17 days between campaign events.

Ok

Next time anyone complains about what the media covers we can be like it's on Twitter so it don't matter.

Maybe the New York Times just capitulated to the protestors? "MIDTOWN, Manhattan (WABC) -- Hours after pro-Palestinian protesters swarmed the New York Times printing facility in Queens, more than 100 demonstrators were arrested outside the newspaper's headquarters in Midtown. Approximately 150 people flooded the lobby of the Times building in Midtown on Thursday morning around 10 a.m. Police say 124 people were taken into custody. Most will likely receive summonses for disorderly conduct. Those who weren't arrested were standing outside the building and chanting, claiming the newspaper's coverage of the Israel Hamas War was resulting in deaths in Gaza. They also handed out fake copies of the Times to people walking by. It came hours after protesters prevented trucks from accessing the Times' 300,000-square-foot printing facility in College Point, Queens, by blocking the roads with debris around 1 a.m. Many laid down in a chain, connecting to each other with tubes. They held signs that read, "Stop the presses. Free Palestine" and "Consent for genocide is manufactured here." They also created a pile of rubble with office equipment to further block access. The action stopped dozens of trucks from picking up newspapers, creating gridlock on nearby streets. The protesters refused to disperse for about two hours before clearing the way at around 3:30 a.m. The facility is responsible for printing the New York Times, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Newsday, and the New York Post. There are 27 printing facilities across the country. The Times said in a statement that readers should expect "minimal disruption" from the protest" Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested outside NY Times building hours after printing plant demonstration in Queens - ABC7 New York (abc7ny.com)

Bush's silence is disappointing. As the only living Republican outside of Trump, it would be nice for him to show solidarity with democracy.

What exactly are they even protesting about now?