buddha

i agree. pure upside play. as of now, they've drafted YET ANOTHER wing player who cannot shoot. maybe cade won't sign that extension after all?

if youre worried about holland's shot - and we all should be worried about it - why do you all love ausar so much? he's unplayable on offense right now.

it's french, bitch! france is dominating this draft!

the nba is about athletic wings. that's ron holland. he's got a lot more offensive upside than asaur (who has almost none). he's athletic and gets downhill. the question is the shot (like ausar) but it's not completely broke (like ausar). trajan must think his shot doctor can work with him. if so, the pick has potential. unless they trade it of course...

https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2024/6/20/24176387/ron-holland-nba-draft-stock-feature-analysis-breakdown-high-school

id rather have hollamd than dillingham. bean pole shooter who plays zero defense? no effing way.

#1 pick from france in back to back years.

🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵

but that was WEAVER'S plan. as if any good player woulf ever hit free agency, as if any team would deal a superstar to get off a contract. i hate troy weaver.

most of the future consideration trades i could find, turned out the future consideration was nothing or a small amount of money. sometimes a low draft pick or player went back the other way. i thought - and wrote - that it most likely be an ahl guy. but it doesnt have to be, it could be something different. we just dont know yet.

the wizards are trading avidja to the blazers for brogdon and the 14th pick? why?

i'm hoping it's something like what you mentioned before, but the league nas to approve these trades and theyre not going to approve something with shenanigans in it. an agreement to do this or not do this in the future is probably not going to fly. then again, maybe it hasnt been submitted for approval yet, who knows? but traditionally, "future considerations" means $ or an AHL roster player.

deion sanders is not a leader. he's an narcissistic, immature, ass hole. they may stumble into some wins here and there because he's able to charm a bunch of 18 year olds and pay them NIL money, but it wont be a successful program. and once his kid is gone he'll lose interest. deion doesnt want to work, he just wants the spotlight. that will become apparent to people after a while and they'll stop wanting to be with him.

if were taking gibson it better come with a nice trevor zegras attached to it. some people swear by gibson, i dont get it. lyon is better.

please not john gibson.

i wonder what they could realistically get for cade? bridges got so many picks because he's a really good player and his contract isnt crazy. cade will be better than bridges but his contract is about to be a max, so maybe not as many picks/pick swaps as we might imagine. but there's no way theyre trading him unless he wont sign the max extension and wants out.

matt anderson was a god awful pick. no denying that. i waa actually surprised that tork has been that bad to even compare to anderson.

randy smith was terrible. al avila was also terrible. differenr situations. smith took over an aging mlb team but had some younger players in the system who turned out ok. higginson, clark, weaver, justin thompson, rob fick! i dont think smith gets credit for any of them except maybe weaver (who was really just "ok") and fick (also just "ok"). he should rightly be criticized for the juan gone deal. smith's team's came within a whisker of 500 a couple times. better than "avila constructed" teama have ever done. avila's only good season was a team he inherited from DD and the proceeded to add jordan zimmerman to. i come not to praise randy smith but to bury him. but i'm burying him right next to the guy who traded away hall of famers for peanuts, signed jordan zimmerman to put the tigers over the top, and inked javy baez to a long term deal. winning % smith: 422 avila: 415 (not counting the covid season, which helps avila). theyre both terrible.

matt anderson career war: -0.6 spencer torkleson career war: -1.7

i hope the wizards pick him up. run it back with bagley and wiseman.

i think red wings fans appreciate but overrate jake walman. dude waa scratched a bit last year after a lot of injuries. good get when they got him for nothing, decent player, probably a bit overpaid but not too much. good offense and bad defense. not physical. not strong. fast. good shot. we'll see what he does this year. there was a bit of a hue and cry when they let filip zadina go for nothing and we see how that turned out.

i think they'd love to get rid of randle to some unsuspecting team with oodles of cap space... watch out wizards fans.

why?

those are pretty aggressive "shades" he's got there.

i assume this means they think a lot of simon edvinsson, because he's likely going to play up top with seider. sign an rhd and kane?