buddha

suh is an ass hole, nothing new. i want my d lineman to be ass holes. mean m'fers who want to rip your head off.

luka doncic 2.0 that'a what the hope was.

ortiz is one of my least favorite players. but what is really galling is the hypocrisy. if steroids are keeping clemens, bonds, and arod out (who are all much better than ortiz) then how is fat papi in? its a joke. but its the hall of fame. the hall of fame has been a joke for a while.

if hayes cant shoot, then at he needs to at least get to the line. use that body to create contact and draw fouls. but he doesnt. the problem with drafting guys that young is that some of them take a while to develop.

sounds like cade is having another great game.

garbage vote.

gary sheffield should be in too. suffers from dick allen disease. writers dont like him.

mcgwire should definitely be in.

clinton was too smart for his own good. nixon was too insecure.

bonds and clemens wont get in until the next generation of writers outs them in through the back door. the baby boomers and their preening moralism will need to die first.

90% market share in kansas city. buffalo was probably even higher.

anything is better than chief wahoo.

this.

609 home runs is a lot. i'd put him in.

😡

mark grace is such a phony.

not only that, but he got shot in the dominican by some gangster. ortiz does some shady shit but gets away with it because he smiles a lot. although, if being a happy black dude as opposed to dick allen gets you in the hall of fame, then why isnt sammy in?

its such bullshit. arod, bonds, clemens, and schilling cant get a sniff and that fat liar gets in on the first ballot because he's "jolly". four of the best players of all time cant get in because the writers have their panties in a bunch about roids or schilling's politics and ortiz gets a pass. manny ramirez should be pissed too.

hall of fame day! too bad shelton isnt here. i think ortiz gets in and nobody else does. which will be a damn shame, but its the bbwaa so you cant expect them to do something smart.

the law attempts to ban speech by candidates for public office, not just public officials. that's a first amendment violation. moreover, what is a "lie" about election results? did hillary clinton lie when she questioned the legitimacy of trump's victory? did stacey abrams lie when she said kemp's win was not legitimate? i am not making an equivalence between what trump did and what hillary and abrams did. but when you pass a vague law like that, you open up the possibility of one party using it against its political enemies. i think its unnecessary and could be extremely damaging.

right. biden said something he shouldnt have and then apologized. that's what adults do. they dont double down on it like trump did. because trump acts like an insecure 15 year old. cause he kinda is. otoh, is jim acosta going to give a tirade about how his life in danger and journalism is in danger because biden swore at a reporter? are we going to get another report from another NGO about how journalists in america are suddenly living dangerous lives and that the us is a dangerous place for journalism? probably not.

it's as bad an unneccessary as that florida law.

the government is punishing people for speech. you'll be fine when they arrest stacey abrams for her comments on the georgia election? let's not pass laws to placate twitter, lets consider the wider implications of what enforcement of that law will look like when the people in power are not your friends.

perfect is the enemy of the good.

clapton has been a nut for a long time.