KL2

Do you think a condition is gonna be a second round pick? You know it's gonna be a who cares thing

There won't be 15k in attendance

cause its not hte NFL draft. He lost his command a bit this year and that led to his increase. if you turn it around he's the pitcher he was when he was a sophomore and its a decent looking pitcher. All these guys take several years before they are ready at the major level, so its kinda foolhardy to just go by what they did the previous year.

Almost no draft class has ever landed that much. Remember one starter and a reliever is a home run. To put it context, Spencer Turnbull has the second highest WAR of any player drafted in the 2014 second round... and only 8 guys drafted in the first 41 picks (round 1) are higher.

As a Tigers fan, love what the royals are doing.

Even if he can't stay a starter a high 90s lefty fastball with a curve might make a decent reliever.

Nearly every drafted player comes with those questions. They are usually the best on their hs or college team so they played shortstop or center, but that gets exposed when they reach the majors

easiest way to recoup massive saving is take a way under slot guy in rounds 3-6. Early you're probably drafting way less of a prospect, later not much savings.

Later rounds is harder to find savings because the slots are smaller. So if you take a guy here, with a slot of $1.9million, but you get him for $1 milion, that gives you nearly another million for a later round pick. If you draft an under slot guy at lets say 260, that value is only $182K so if you sign him for 100, you're only saving 82.

But you're assuming Lankford is guaranteed to hit as well. He's not

might be a cost savings

Prestige and in this case he probably doesn't mind the potential of playing close to home/family

yeah it goes to strategy, do you take the best guy you possibly can knowing it will cost you more and might hurt who you can take later or do you take a guy down a spot or two on the overall ranking hoping to get prospect 21 instead of 27 later. Usually depends on the players available and what your system needs.

Cause its still a crap ton of money and a less risk than passing it and going to college where preforming worse or getting hurt would see him tumble when he enters the draft and receive significantly less money and opportunity than being a high round 1 pick. The slots are just recommended amounts and go to a total pool your team has to sign draft picks. So you might spend less on your round 1 guy so in round two you can get a player who has higher financial demands and teams passed on him at the end of the first. He's a better talent but priced himself out of some team's range. You'll see teams do that. Spend less on top pick than slot and use the saving later in the draft. We did to land Colt Keith for example. Other times you'll see teams go over slot and spend more to get a player then in a later round draft a way less prospect that is often a college senior and offer them pennies to save money.

both

Can;t play college if you sign. If he signs they might send him to rookie ball in Lakeland for the rest of the year then likely west michigan to start next year. If he doesn't sign he can go to school, isn't draft eligible until 2026 and we get pick 4 next year.

That's not true. Not true at all.

What's not to understand?: It's not like Clark was rated 208th. He was in the top five of nearly everybody's board and has crazy high upside. Not to mention is a pretty good ballplayer projected to stay in center. Sure Lankford seem like the more obvious pick but Clark has the ceiling of a Betts while Lankford is probably Andrew McCutheon.

That;s a long played out misnomer

I'd stay out the prediction business for a bit

Whoops

Almost no supplemental pick nowadays is worth anything. No reason to give up any pick for either of these guys. There are a million of em available as udfa or on the cut wire.

All three?! How the hell do we pull that off??!

Didn't he just spend like $200 million an offseason ago?

Colts Minor stats: OPS of .907 in 792 Plate Appearance Torks: OPS of .889 in 685 Plate appearances. So pretty comparable and tork's sample is smaller than 'keith's current small sampe size"