gehringer_2

Feast or famine for the Houston bats.

didn't they get in a rut last year giving up too much in games early to come back? Hope this is a one of in that regard.

OT. Larkin time.

Seider!

TV PBP for hockey is changing anyway. As the old guys that started in radio have retired it seems not many guys even try to do a real running PBP for hockey anymore. Daniels certainly doesn't. Maybe the assumption is that now that hockey is telecast on big 16:9 screens they don't really need to, and maybe they are right. I don't think any sport benefited more from wide screen TV than hockey.

I don't hate Baez, but I am more leery about giving a high K guy big dollars over a long term. And he's not a guy that Ks but also walks a lot. The idea being that if he already has trouble finding the ball at 28 what is going to be like at 32? Maybe it's not true that high K/BB guys hit the wall sooner career wise - I'd be willing to be persuaded by some numbers, but that would be my biggest reservation. If you could get him on a shorter commitment.....but we probably can't.

You can take political solace in those numbers if you like, but the difference between FLAs numbers and MIs numbers is that MIs were run up mostly before we had tools to keep it down, FLA ran theirs up mostly after they had the chance to do better.

But he didn't bring a public charge against Aldrich at the time. According to today's NPR story, Beech said it was the criminal charge in MI against Aldrich that persuaded him he could bring a case that where "It was no longer my word against everybody else's," so he apparently continued to believe the Black Hawks would circle the wagons if he had brought a more public accusation at the time. according to the same story he is a pro in Germany. I suppose if he were that good he would have come to some other team's attention. He isn't making the charge that the NHL has blackballed him...so far.

and those will last .....until someone decides to sue? 🙄

if it's just misunderstanding that's not that big a deal. I think I see what SFC reacted to and how he read and I can recognize that I can correct that impression. The harder thing is when you really do have a deeper disagreement. Writing explanations is more work than people usually want to do - the temptation is often to just 'write if off' and stay irritated....

I like Gomes, leave the rest.

How does the University even control that? I would have thought the court decision should have given the players the right to make their own deals!

I don't understand why you associate any assumption - whether incorrect or not, that Beech might be gay as constituting blaming him for anything. Is it any more or less a crime to rape a straight man than a gay one? The "blame to go around" refers to society as a whole having created homophobia - But if this is what you didn't read as I intended it I can see that now.

so run this by me again because I'm missing it. Alridge is going to end Beech's career by injuring him, or by smearing him? And if the latter, what is the basis? If the smear is based on the event it's still fundamentally based on homophobia, is it not? If you are straight why to do care if you are accused of being gay if that is not does not have a negative shade?

TBH SFC, your post about 'homophobic slurs' is part of why I was confused. I obviously didn't take it the way you meant it.

besides, how is it blaming Beech if he were gay? Whose biases are showing there?

that is fair enough, but not all that relevant for Beech. That is making Toews the story and he doesn't rate it. Unless there is something to actually hold him accountable for - and if there is that is what should be the topic. That a pro athlete is a narcissist is not news.

OK - I was honestly confused by what I have read in the thread and realized it and went back and reread the story, and I'm still confused. Now someone is talking baseball bat - in one of the earlier stories it did say Alridge theatened to smear him, not beat him. So I'll pass saying more until I'm more clear here.

and I'll go back to the fact that I wouldn't count on them not going there if the money gets tight. We can probably keep betting on their virtue as long as Michigan fan stays happy enough to keep buying tickets. If that part goes away, I'm not sure I take the bet.

apparently once Bert got hurt, being left with Mantha just sucked out his soul....

..

My recollection is that 5/100K was an action level the epidemiologists were working with early on - that certainly has probably changed given that the bug has ended up more infectious than originally estimated. But OTOH, the original concept here being that if you can contact trace all the positives, you can keep it in check, and so the stable infection level really has more to do with how much public health resource you have to do contract tracing rather than any particular property of the infection and that is what I believe that 5/100k number was based on. Now in practice Covid has overrun anyone's capability to do effective contact tracing so that has not been part of the conversation for months, but that doesn't mean the concept wasn't correct. As this comes under control there should be levels at which things like contact tracing (or whatever) that were not feasible at high infection rates come back into play, and those considerations should allow the Epids to come up with action levels to relax. But the larger point is that it's not all just black magic and numbers pulled from a hat. The estimates may not always turn out to be correct but they do have non-arbitrary reasons for choosing them.

Another obsolete concept in the age of the cell phone camera and internet.

but there is still an even more general point. We don't pay our pro-athletes to be great people, we pay them to be great athletes. You could pick any day of the weak and find reasons to pick out athletes and dump on them for not being saints. That's just the way it is. We seem to have enough trouble holding those accountable who actually do the bad stuff. Spending a lot of energy on judging other peoples reactions about it seems unproductive.

I think I would leave the letters there but put cross-outs over them. Isn't remember and repudiate better than just erase and forget?