I think this whole thing about Scott Harris being “hard to deal with” is that he doesn’t play by the rules many others adhere to and since he doesn’t obey it irks them. The Tigers are doing something different other teams don’t understand.
There are those who merely understand “big guns“ and more of them as the beginning and the end of it all.
But it’s really a question of the difference between a “frontal assault“ that is merely additive, and an “asymmetrical war position” which identifies unique strengths, and exploits weaknesses in other teams leading to an advantage.
It’s sort of the difference between merely adding more cheese to an omelette and thinking you’ve accomplished something, and adding chopped onions and peppers and some curry powder and changing plans to make a quiche instead.
It’s the difference between Guy Fieri and Anthony Bourdain.